While the literature on collective memory suggests that a multivocal type of commemoration will be constructed in response to a difficult past, Yitzhak Rabin's commemorations provide a case study of a different type of commemoration of challenging events: a fragmented commemoration. A fragmented commemoration consists of multiple times and spaces in which different discourses of the past are aimed at disparate audiences. The author offers a theoretical model within which the emergence of both types of commemoration (multivocal and fragmented) can be understood and analyzed. The model consists of three dimensions: (1) the political culture of the commemorating society, (2) the relevance of past to present, and (3) the power of agents of memory. Explanatory models consisting of a dynamic interplay of agents, cultures, and structures prove valuable as a basis for the study of various sorts of cultural productions in general and commemorative types in particular.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AguilarPaloma. 1997. “Collective Memory of the Spanish Civil War: The Case of the Political Amnesty in the Spanish Transition to Democracy.”Democratization4:88–109.
2.
AguilarPaloma. 1999. “Agents of Memory: Spanish Civil War Veterans and Disabled Soldiers.” Pp. 84–103 in War and Remembrance in the Twentieth Century, edited by WinterJ. and SivanE.. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
3.
AldermanDerek H.1996. “Creating a New Geography of Memory in the South: (Re)Naming of Streets in Honor of Martin Luther King, Jr.”Southeastern Geographer36:51–69.
4.
AlexanderJeffrey C. and SmithPhilip. 1993. “The Discourse of American Civil Society: A New Proposal for Cultural Studies.”Theory and Society22:151–207.
5.
AzaryahuMaoz. 1996. “The Spontaneous Formation of Memorial Space.”Area28:501–13.
6.
BeamishThomas D., MolotchHarvey, and FlacksRichard. 1995. “Why Support the Troops? Vietnam, the Gulf War, and the Making of Collective Memory.”Social Problems42:344–60.
7.
BellahRobert N., MadsenRichard, SullivanWilliam M., SwidlerAnn, and TiptonSteven M.. 1985. Habits of the Heart.New York: Harper and Row.
8.
Ben-SimonDaniel. 1997. “Something Fundamental Changed on the Day You Were Assassinated” (in Hebrew). Ha'aretz, November 13, p. A2.
9.
Ben-YehudaNachman. 1995. The Masada Myth.Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
10.
Ben-YehudaNachman. 1997. “Political Assassination Events as a Cross-Cultural Form of Alternative Justice.”International Journal of Comparative Sociology38:25–47.
11.
BerezinMabel. 1997. “Politics and Culture: A Less Fissured Terrain.”Annual Review of Sociology23:361–83.
12.
BunzlMatti. 1995. “On the Politics and Semantics of Austrian Memory: Vienna's Monument against War and Fascism.”History and Memory7:7–38.
13.
ChamishBarry. 1999. Who Assassinated Yitzhak Rabin? (in Hebrew). Jerusalem, Israel: Gefen.
14.
ChenMichael. 2000. The Guards of Peace and Democracy, November 4th1995: Annals of aProtest Organization (in Hebrew). Tel Aviv, Israel: Tel Aviv University and Ramot Press.
15.
CressyDavid. 1994. “National Memory in Early Modern England.” Pp. 61–73 in Commemorations: The Politics of National Identity, edited by GillisJ.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
DurkheimEmil. 1965. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life.New York: Free Press.
17.
DucharmeLori J. and FineGary A.. 1995. “The Construction of Nonpersonhood and Demonization: Commemorating the Traitorous Reputation of Benedict Arnold.”Social Forces73:1309–31.
18.
EhrenhausPeter. 1989. “Commemorating the Unwon War: On Not Remembering Vietnam.”Journal of Communication39:96–107.
19.
EisenstadtShmuel N.1985. The Transformation of Israeli Society.London, England: Westview.
20.
FineGary A.2001. Difficult Reputations: Collective Memories of the Evil, Inept, and Controversial.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21.
FreemanMark. 1993. Rewriting the Self: History, Memory, Narrative.London, England: Routledge.
22.
FriedlandRoger and HechtRichard. 1996. To Rule Jerusalem.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
23.
GoffmanErving. 1974. Frame Analysis.New York: Harper and Row.
24.
GriswoldCharles L.1986. “The Vietnam Veterans Memorial and the Washington Mall: Philosophical Thoughts on Political Iconography.”Critical Inquiry12:688–719.
25.
GriswoldWendy. 1987a. “A Methodological Framework for the Sociology of Culture.”Sociological Methodology17:1–35.
26.
GriswoldWendy. 1987b. “The Fabrication of Meaning: Literary Interpretation in the United States, Great Britain, and the West Indies.”American Journal of Sociology92:1077–1117.
27.
HalbwachsMaurice. 1992. On Collective Memory.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28.
HandelmanDon. 1990. Models and Mirrors.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
29.
HartzLouis. 1955. The Liberal Tradition in America.New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
30.
HassKristin Ann. 1998. Carried to the Wall: American Memory and the Vietnam Veterans Memorial.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
31.
HelmanSara. 1999. “From Soldiering and Motherhood to Citizenship: A Study of Four Israeli Peace Protest Movements.”Social Politics6:291–313.
32.
HorowitzDan and LissakMoshe. 1989. Trouble in Utopia.Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
33.
Irwin-ZareckaIwona. 1994. Frames of Remembrance: The Dynamics of Collective Memory.New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
34.
JacobsRonald N.1996. “Civil Society and Crisis: Culture, Discourse, and the Rodney King Beating.”American Journal of Sociology101:1238–72.
35.
KasherAsa. 1997. “Yitzhak Rabin Did Not Die” (in Hebrew). Ma'ariv, November 7, p. 7.
36.
KertzerDavid I.1988. Ritual, Politics, and Power.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
37.
KimmerlingBaruch. 1985. “Between the Primordial and the Civil Definitions of the Collective Identity: Eretz Israel or The State of Israel.” Pp. 262–83 in Comparative Social Dynamics: Essays in Honor of S. N. Eisenstadt, edited by CohenE., LissakM., and AlmagorU.. London, England: Westview.
38.
KimmerlingBaruch. 1996. “The Sources of Political Culture in Israel.” Pp. 395–407 in Israel Towards the Year 2000: Society, Politics and Culture (in Hebrew), edited by LissakM. and Kney-PazB.. Jerusalem, Israel: Magnes, Hebrew University Press.
39.
KoselleckReinhart. 1994. “Introduction.” Pp. 9–20 in The Political Cult of the Dead: War Memorials in the Modern Era (in German), edited by KoselleckR. and JeismannM.. Munich, Germany: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
40.
LevyDaniel. 1999. “The Future of the Past: Historiographical Disputes and Competing Memories in Germany and Israel.”History and Theory38:51–66.
41.
MaierCharles S.1998. The Unmasterable Past: History, Holocaust, and German National Identity.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
McAdamsDan P.1993. The Stories We Live By: Personal Myth and the Making of the Self.New York: William Morrow.
43.
McCallMichal M.1990. “The Significance of Storytelling.”Studies in Symbolic Interaction11:145–61.
44.
MitchellWilliam J., ed. 1981. On Narrative.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
45.
NoraPierre. 1989. “Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Memoire.”Representations26:7–25.
46.
OlickJeffrey K.1999a. “Collective Memory: The Two Cultures.”Sociological Theory17:333–48.
47.
OlickJeffrey K.1999b. “Genre Memories and Memory Genres: A Dialogical Analysis of May 8, 1945 Commemorations in the Federal Republic of Germany.”American Sociological Review64:381–402.
48.
OlickJeffrey K. and LevyDaniel. 1997. “Collective Memory and Cultural Constraint: Holocaust Myth and Rationality in German Politics.”American Sociological Review62:921–36.
49.
OlickJeffrey K. and RobbinsJoyce. 1998. “Social Memory Studies: From ‘Collective Memory’ to the Historical Sociology of Mnemonic Practices.”Annual Review of Sociology24:105–40.
50.
PeriYoram. 1999. “The Media and Collective Memory of Yitzhak Rabin's Remembrance.”Journal of Communication49:106–24.
51.
PolletaFrancesca. 1998. “Legacies and Liabilities of an Insurgent Past: Remembering Martin Luther King, Jr., on the House and Senate Floor.”Social Science History22:479–512.
52.
ProstAntoine. 1999. “The Algerian War in French Collective Memory.” Pp. 161–76 in War and Remembrance in the Twentieth Century, edited by WinterJ. and SivanE.. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
53.
RonigerLuis and SznajderMario. 1999. The Legacy of Human-Rights Violations in the Southern Cone.Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
54.
SchwartzBarry. 1982. “The Social Context of Commemoration: A Study in Collective Memory.”Social Forces61:374–402.
55.
SchwartzBarry. 1991. “Mourning and the Making of a Sacred Symbol: Durkheim and the Lincoln Assassination.”Social Forces70:343–64.
56.
SchwartzBarry. 1997. “Collective Memory and History: How Abraham Lincoln Became a Symbol for Racial Equality.”Sociological Quarterly38: 469–96.
57.
SchwartzBarry. 2000. Abraham Lincoln and the Forge of National Memory.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
58.
SchwartzBarry and BaymaTodd. 1999. “Commemoration and the Politics of Recognition: The Korean War Veterans Memorial.”American Behavioral Scientist42:946–67.
59.
SchudsonMichael. 1989. “The Present in the Past versus the Past in the Present.”Communication11:105–13.
60.
ScottShaunna L.1996. “Dead Work: The Construction and Reconstruction of the Harlan Miners Memorial.”Qualitative Sociology19:365–93.
61.
SnowDavid A. and BenfordRobert D.. 1992. “Master Frames and Cycles of Protest.” Pp. 133–55 in Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, edited by MorrisA. and MuellerC.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
62.
SomersMargaret. 1995. “What's Political or Cultural about Political Culture and the Public Sphere? Toward an Historical Sociology of Concept Formation.”Sociological Theory13:113–44.
63.
SteinbergMarc W.1998. “Tilting the Frame: Considerations on Collective Action Framing from a Discursive Turn.”Theory and Society27:845–72.
64.
SturkenMarita. 1997. Tangled Memories.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
65.
SullivanJohn L., ShamirMichal, WalshPartick, and RobertsNigel S.. 1985. Political Tolerance in Context: Support for Unpopular Minorities in Israel, New Zealand, and the United States.Boulder, CO: Westview.
66.
TarrowSidney. 1998. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
67.
TatunJames. 1996. “Memorials of the American War in Vietnam.”Critical Inquiry22:634–80.
68.
TurnerVictor. 1967. The Forest of Symbols.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
69.
Wagner-PacificiRobin and SchwartzBarry. 1991. “The Vietnam Veterans Memorial: Commemorating a Difficult Past.”American Journal of Sociology97:376–420.
70.
YoungJames E.1993. The Texture of Memory. 1993. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
71.
ZelizerBarbie. 1992. Covering the Body.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
72.
ZelizerBarbie. 1995. “Reading the Past against the Grain: The Shape of Memory Studies.”Critical Studies in Mass Communication12:214–39.
73.
ZerubavelEvitar. 1993. “In the Beginning: Notes on the Social Construction of Historical Discontinuity.”Sociological Inquiry63:457–59.
74.
ZerubavelYael. 1995. Recovered Roots.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
75.
ZolbergVera L.1998. “Contested Remembrance: The Hiroshima Exhibit Controversy.”Theory and Society27:565–90.
