Who in America volunteers what and why? And what impact does volunteering have? It is widely believed that the typical volunteer is middle-aged and middle-class and that volunteerism is rooted in American cultural individualism. Undocumented and unexplored are collectivistic roots of giving, which may have a different social base than individualistc-grounded volunteerism. Characteristics of collectivistic-rooted volunteerism, conditions under which it transpires, and group and community effects of such giving are explored here. The analysis is based on ethnographic research in a predominantly “old immigrant” working-class inner-ring suburb. Collectivistic-rooted volunteerism is shown to be community-embedded and to have group, community, and class stratifying effects.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbelEmily and NelsonMargaret. 1990. Circles of Caring: Work and Identity in Women's Lives.Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
2.
AlbaRichard. 1990. Ethnic Identity: The Transformation of White America.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
3.
AlbaRichard, LoganJohn, and CrowderKyle. 1997. “White Ethnic Neighborhood and Assimilation: The Greater New York Region, 1980–1990.”Social Forces75:883–912.
4.
AlbaRichard, LoganJohn, StubbsBrian, MarzanGilbert, and ZhangWenquan. 1999. “Immigrant Groups in the Suburbs: A Reexamination of Suburbanization and Spatial Assimilation.”American Sociological Review64:446–60.
5.
BanfieldEdward. 1958. The Moral Basis of a Backward Society.New York: Free Press.
6.
BellahRobert, MadsenRichard, SullivanWilliam, SwidlerAnn, and TiptonSteven. 1985. Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
7.
BenedictRuth. 1959. Patterns of Culture.Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
8.
BurlingameDwight and FrishkoffPatricia. 1996. “How Does Firm Size Affect Corporate Philanthropy?” Pp. 86–101 in Corporate Philanthropy at the Crossroads, edited by BurlingameD. and YoungD.. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
9.
CaplowTheodore, BahrHoward, ChadwickBruce, HillReuben, and WilliamsonMargaret Holmes. 1982. Middletown Families: Fifty Years of Change and Continuity.Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
10.
CarsonEmmett. 1995. “How Institutions Shape a Caring Society.” Pp. 299–312 in Care and Community in Modern Society, edited by SchervishP., HodgkinsonV., M. Gates, and Associates. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11.
Di LeonardoMacaela. 1987. “The Female World of Cards and Holidays: Women, Families, and the Work of Kinship.”Journal of Women in Culture and Society12:440–53.
12.
DanielsArlene. 1985. “Good Times and Good Works: The Place of Sociability in the Work of Women Volunteers.”Social Problems32:363–74.
13.
EhrenhaltAlan. 1995. The Lost City: Discovering the Forgotten Virtues of Community in the Chicago of the 1950s.New York: Basic Books.
14.
GalaskiewiczJoseph. 1989. “Corporate Contributions to Charity: Nothing More than a Marketing Strategy?” Pp. 246–60 in Philanthropic Giving, edited by MagatR.. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
GansHerbert. 1982. The Urban Villagers: Group and Class in the Life of Italian-Americans.New York: Free Press.
16.
GlaserBarney and StraussAnselm. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
17.
GordonMilton. 1964. Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins.New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
GouldnerAlvin. 1960. “The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement.”American Sociological Review25:161–78.
19.
HerbergWill. 1956. Protestant-Catholic-Jew.Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
20.
HodgkinsonVirginia and WeitzmanMurray. 1984. Dimensions of the independent Sector: A Statistical Profile.Washington, DC: Independent Sector.
21.
HodgkinsonVirginia and WuthnowRobert. 1990. Faith and Philanthropy in America: Exploring the Role of Religion in America's Voluntary Sector.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
22.
Levi-StraussClaude. 1969. The Elementary Structures of Kinship.Boston, MA: Beacon.
23.
LevittPeggy. 2001. The Transnational Villagers.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
24.
LevyReynold. 1999. “Corporate Philanthropy Comes of Age: Its Size, Its Import, Its Future.” Pp. 97–119 in Philanthropy and the Nonprofit Sector in a Changing America, edited by ClotfelterC. and EhrlichT.. Bloomington, IN: University of Indiana Press.
25.
LiebersonStanley. 1980. A Piece of the Pie: Blacks and White Immigrants Since 1880.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
26.
LiebersonStanley. 1985. “Unhyphenated Whites in the United States.”Ethnic and Racial Studies8:159–80.
27.
MalinowskiBronislaw. 1927. Argonauts of the Western Pacific.London, England: Routledge.
28.
MaussMarcel. 1967. The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies.New York: Norton.
29.
O'ConnorRobert and JohnsonRebecca. 1989. “Volunteer Demographics and Future Prospects for Volunteering.” Pp. 403–15 in The Future of the Nonprofit Sector: Challenges, Changes, and Policy Considerations, edited by HodgkinsonV. and LymanR.. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
30.
OrsiRobert. 1985. The Madonna of 115th Street: Faith and Community in Italian Harlem, 1880–1950.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
31.
OstranderSusan and FisherJoan. 1995. “Women Giving Money, Women Raising Money: What Difference for Philanthropy?”New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising8(Summer): 67–78.
32.
OstranderSusan and SchervishPaul. 1990. “Giving and Getting: Philanthropy as a Social Relation.” Pp. 67–98 in Critical Issues in American Philanthropy, edited by J. Van Til and Associates. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
33.
OstrowerFrancie. 1995. Why the Wealthy Give: The Culture of Elite Philanthropy.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
PortesAlejandro and ManningRobert. 1986. “The Immigrant Enclave: Theory and Empirical Examples. Pp. 47–68 in Competitive Ethnic Relations, edited by OlzakS. and NagelJ.. Orlando, FL: Academic.
35.
PutnamRobert. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
PutnamRobert. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community.New York: Simon and Schuster.
37.
RaginCharles. 1994. Constructing Social Research.Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.
38.
RocheJohn. 1982. “Suburban Ethnicity: Ethnic Attitudes and Behavior among Italian Americans in Two Suburban Communities.”Social Science Quarterly63:145–53.
39.
RoschelleAnne. 1997. No More Kin: Exploring Race, Class, and Gender in Family Networks.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
SchlozmanKay, VerbaSidney, and BradyHenry. 1999. “Civic Participation and the Equality Problem.” Pp. 427–60 in Civic Engagement in American Democracy, edited by SkocpolT. and FiorinaM.. Washington, DC and New York: Brookings Institution Press and Russell Sage Foundation.
41.
SimmelGeorg. 1950. “Faithfulness and Gratitude.” Pp. 379–95 in Sociology of Georg Simmel, edited by WolffK.. New York: Free Press.
42.
SkocpolTheda, with GanzMarshall, MunsonZiad, CampBayliss, SwersMichelle, and OserJennifer. 1999. “How Americans Became Civic.” Pp. 27–80 in Civic Engagement in American Democracy, edited by SkocpolT. and FiorinaM.. Washington, DC and New York: Brookings Institution Press and Russell Sage Foundation.
43.
StackCarol. 1974. All Our Kin: Strategies for Survival in a Black Community.New York: Harper and Row.
44.
ThernstromStephan. 1973. The Other Bostonians: Poverty and Progress in the American Metropolis, 1880–1970.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45.
TitmussRichard. 1971. The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy.New York: Pantheon.
46.
TropmanJohn. 1995. “The Catholic Ethic and the Protestant Ethic.” Pp. 269–91 in Care and Community in Modern Society, edited by SchervishP., HodgkinsonV., and GatesM.. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
47.
UseemMichael. 1988. “Market and Institutional Factors in Corporate Contributions.”California Management Review30(12): 77–88.
48.
WatersMary. 1990. Ethnic Options: Choosing Identities in America.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
49.
WeisbrodBurton. 1988. The Nonprofit Economy.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50.
WengerBeth. 1989. “Jewish Women and Voluntarism: Beyond the Myth of Enablers”American Jewish History79(1): 16–36.
51.
WhyteWilliam Foote. 1969. Street Corner Society: Social Structure of an Italian Slum.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
52.
WolpertJulian. 1989. “Key Indicators of Income Generation for Nonprofits.” Pp. 103–22 in The Future of the Nonprofit Sector: Challenges, Changes, and Policy Considerations, edited by HodgkinsonV. and LymanR.. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
53.
WolpertJulian. 1995. “Fragmentation in America's Nonprofit Sector.” Pp. 459–77 in Care and Community in Modern Society, edited by edited by SchervishP., HodgkinsonV., and GatesM.. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
54.
WuthnowRobert. 1991. Acts of Compassion: Caring for Others and Helping Ourselves.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
55.
WuthnowRobert. 1999. “Mobilizing Civic Engagement: The Changing Impact of Religious Involvement.” Pp. 331–66 in Civic Engagement in American Democracy, edited by SkocolT. and FiorinaM.. Washington, DC and New York: Brookings Institution Press and Russell Sage Foundation.
56.
YanceyWilliam, EricksonEugene, and LeonGeorge. 1985. “The Structure of Pluralism: ‘We're All Italian Around Here, Aren't We, Mrs. O'Brien?”’Ethnic and Racial Studies8:94–116.
