Voluntary association membership varies dramatically among nations, by both the number and the type of associations that people join. Two distinctions account for much of this variation: (1) the distinction between statist versus nonstatist (sometimes called “liberal”) societies, and (2) the distinction between corporate versus noncorporate societies. These two dimensions summarize historically evolved differences in state structure, political institutions, and culture of nations that channel, legitimate (or deligitimate), and encourage (or discourage) various types of associational activity. Membership in associations in 32 countries is examined using data from the 1991 World Values Survey; hierarchical models estimate the effects of individual-level and country-level factors on individual association membership. Results show that statism constrains individual associational activity of all types, particularly in “new “ social movement associations. Corporateness positively affects membership, particularly for “old” social movements. Finally, temporal trends indicate some convergence toward Anglo-American patterns of association.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlmondGabriel and VerbaSidney. 1963. The Civic Culture.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
AmentaEdwin, BonastiaChris, and CarenNeal. 2001. “U.S. Social Policy in Comparative and Historical Perspective: Concepts, Images, Arguments, and Research Strategies.”Annual Review of Sociology27:213–34.
3.
AndersonPerry. 1974. Lineages of the Absolutist State.London, England: New Left.
4.
AnheierHelmut K.1990. The Third Sector: Comparative Studies of Non-Profit Organizations.Berlin, Germany and New York: DeGryuter.
5.
AnheierHelmut K.1991. “West Germany: The Ambiguities of Peak Associations.” Pp. 64–93 in Between States and Markets: The Voluntary Sector in Comparative Perspective, edited by WuthnowR.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
BeckfordJames A.1991. “Great Britain: Voluntarism ansd Sectional Interests.” Pp. 30–63 in Between States and Markets: The Voluntary Sector in Comparative Perspective, edited by WuthnowR.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
BellahRobert N., SullivanWilliam M., SwidlerAnn, and TiptonSteven M.. 1985. Habits of the Heart. Individualism and Commitment in American Life.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
8.
BergerPeter L. and LuckmannThomas. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge.New York: Anchor Books.
9.
BirnbaumPierre. 1988. States and Collective Action: The European Experience.New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.
BirnbaumPierre and BadieBertrand. 1983. The Sociology of the State.Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
11.
BoliJohn. 1991. “Sweden: Is There a Viable Third Sector?.” Pp. 94–124 in Between States and Markets: the Voluntary Sector in Comparative Perspective, edited by WuthnowR.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12.
BoyleElizabeth H.2000. “Is Law the Rule? Using Political Frames to Explain Cross-National Variation in Legal Activity.”Social Forces78:1195–1226.
13.
BrykAnthony S. and RaudenbushStephen. 1992. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
ClemensElizabeth S.1997. The People's Lobby: Organizational Innovation and the Rise of Interest Group Politics in the United States, 1890–1925.Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
15.
CohenJean L.1999. “Does Voluntary Association Make Democracy Work?” Pp. 263–91 in Diversity and Its Discontents: Cultural Conflict and Common Ground in Contemporary American Society, edited by SmelserN. J. and AlexanderJ. C.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
CurtisJames. 1971. “Voluntary Association Joining: A Cross-National Comparative Note.”American Sociological Review.36:872–80.
17.
CurtisJames, GrabEdward, and BaerDouglas. 1992. “Voluntary Association Membership in Fifteen Countries: A Comparative Analysis.”American Sociological Review.57:139–52.
18.
CutlerStephen J.1976. “Age Differences in Voluntary Association Membership.”Social Forces.55:43–58.
19.
DobbinFrank. 1994. Forging Industrial Policy.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
20.
DurkheimEmile. [1893] 1984. The Division of Labor in Society.New York: Free Press.
21.
DuyvendakJan W.1995. The Power of Politics: New Social Movements in France.Boulder, CO: Westview.
22.
DysonKenneth. 1980. The State Tradition in Western Europe.Oxford, England: Martin Robertson.
23.
EkiertGrzegorz. 1991. “Democratization Processes in East Central Europe: A Theoretical Reconsideration.”British Journal of Political Science21:285–313.
24.
Esping-AndersenGosta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
Esping-AndersenGosta. 1999. The Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies.Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
26.
FrankDavid and MeyerJohn W.. Forthcoming. “The Profusion of Individual Roles and Identities in the Post-War Period.”Sociological Theory19.
27.
FrankDavid J., MeyerJohn W., and MiyaharaDavid. 1995. “The Individualist Polity and the Prevalence of Professionalized Psychology: A Cross-National Study.”American Sociological Review60:360–77.
28.
EriedlandRoger and AlfordRobert R.. 1991. “Bringing Society Back In: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions.” Pp. 232–66 in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by PowellW. W. and DiMaggioP. J.. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
29.
GorskiPhilip S.1993. “The Protestant Ethic Revisited: Disciplinary Revolution and State Formation in Holland and Prussia.”American Journal of Sociology99:265–316.
30.
GreeleyAndrew. 1997. “The Other Civic America: Religion and Social Capital.”The American Prospect32:68–73.
31.
GustaffsonGoran. 1982. “Popular Religion in Sweden.”Social Compass29:103–12.
32.
GuoGuang and ZhaoHongxin. 2000. “Multilevel Modeling for Binary Data.”Annual Review of Sociology26:441–62.
33.
HarrisJose. 1990. “Society and the State in Twentieth Century Britain.” Pp. 63–117 in The Cambridge Social History of Britain, 1750–1950, vol. 3, Social Agencies and Institutions, edited by ThompsonF. M. L.. Cambridge, England and New York: Cambridge University Press.
34.
HealyKieran. 2000. “Embedded Altruism: Blood Collection Regimes and the European Union's Donor Population.”American Journal of Sociology105:1633–57.
35.
HecloHugh. 1988. “The In-and-Outer System: A Critical Assessment.”Political Science Quarterly103:37–56.
36.
HecloHugh and MadsenHenrik. 1987. Policy and Politics in Sweden: Principled Pragmatism.Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
37.
HecloHugh and WildavskyAaron. 1974. The Private Government of Public Money. Community and Policy Inside British Politics.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
38.
InglehartRonald. 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39.
InglehartRonald. 1997. Modernization and Post-Modernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40.
InglehartRonald and BakerWayne. 2000. “Modernization, Cultural Change and the Persistence of Traditional Values.”American Sociological Review65:19–51.
41.
JaggersKeith and GurrTed Robert. 1995. Polity III: Regime Change and Political Authority, 1800–1994.Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
42.
JamesEstelle. 1989. The Nonprofit Sector in Comparative Perspective: Studies in Comparative Culture and Policy.Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
43.
JeppersonRonald. 1992. National Scripts: The Varying Construction of Individualism and Opinion across the Modern Nation-States. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Political Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
44.
JeppersonRonald. Forthcoming. “Institutional Logics: On the Constitutive Dimensions of Modern Nation-State Polities.”Sociological Theory20(1).
45.
JeppersonRonald and MeyerJohn W.. 1991. “The Public Order and the Construction of Formal Organizations.” Pp. 204–31 in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by DiMaggioP. J. and PowellW. W.. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
46.
KitscheltHerbert. 1985. “New Social Movements in West Germany and the United States.”Political Power and Social Theory5: 273–324.
47.
KlandermansBert, KriesiHans-Peter, and TarrowSidney, eds. 1988. From Structure to Action: Comparing Movement Participation Across Cultures.Greenwich, CT: JAI.
48.
KlandermansBert and TarrowSidney. 1988. “Mobilization into Social Movements: Synthesizing European and American Approaches.”International Social Movement Research1:1–38.
49.
KnokeDavid. 1986. “Associations and Interest Groups.”Annual Review of Sociology12:1–21.
50.
KnokeDavid and ThompsonRandall. 1977. “Voluntary Association Membership Trends and the Family Life Cycle.”Social Forces56:48–65.
51.
KriesiHanspeter, KoopmansRuud, DyvendakJan Willem, and GiugniMarco. 1995. New Social Movements in Europe: A Comparative Analysis.Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
52.
LamontMichele and ThévenotLaurent, eds. 2000. Rethinking Comparative Cultural Sociology. Repertoires of Evaluation in France and the United States.New York: Cambridge University Press.
53.
LevyJonah. 1999. Tocqueville's Revenge. State, Society and Economy in Contemporary France.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54.
LipsetSeymour Martin. 1960. Political Man; the Social Bases of Politics.Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
55.
LipsetSeymour Martin. 1963. “The Value Patterns of Democracy: A Case Study in Comparative Analysis.”American Sociological Review28:515–31.
56.
LipsetSeymour Martin. 1985. “Canada and the United States: The Cultural Dimension.” Pp. 109–60 in Canada and the United States, edited by DoranC. F. and SiglerJ.. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
57.
MannMichael. 1986. The Sources of Social Power. Vol. 2, The Rise of Classes and Nation-States, 1760–1914.New York: Cambridge University Press.
58.
McAdamDouglas, McCarthyJohn D., and ZaldMayer N., eds. 1996. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framing.Cambridge, England and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
59.
MelucciAlberto. 1980. “The New Social Movements: A Theoretical Approach.”Social Science information19:199–226.
60.
MeyerJohn W.1983. “Institutionalization and the Rationality of Formal Organizational Structure.” Pp. 261–82 in Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality, edited by MeyerJ. W. and ScottW. R.. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
61.
MeyerJohn and JeppersonRonald. 2000. “The “Actors” of Modern Society: The Cultural Construction of Social Agency.”Sociological Theory18:100–20.
62.
MeyerJohn W., BoliJohn, ThomasGeorge, and RamirezFrancisco O.. 1997. “World Society and the Nation-State.”American Journal of Sociology103:144–81.
63.
MeyerJohn W., FrankDavid, HironakaAnn, SchoferEvan, and TumaNancy B.. 1997. “The Rise of an Environmental Sector in World Society.”International Organization51:623–51.
64.
MichelettiMichele. 1995. Civil Society and State Relations in Sweden.Aldershot, England: Avebury.
65.
MorganKimberly J.2000. Whose Hand Rocks the Cradle? The Politics of Child Care Policy in Advanced Industrialized States. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Sociology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
66.
MorrisR. J.1990. “Clubs, Societies, Associations.” Pp. 395–444 in The Cambridge Social History of Britain, 1750–1950, vol. 3, Social Agencies and Institutions, edited by ThompsonF. M. L.. Cambridge, England and New York: Cambridge University Press.
67.
MoyserGeorge and ParryGeraint. 1997. “Voluntary Associations and Democratic Participation in Britain.” In Private Groups and Public Life. Political Involvement in Representative Democracies. Edited by van DethJ.. New York: Routledge.
68.
NettlJ. P.1968. “The State as a Conceptual Variable.”World Politics.20:559–92.
69.
OramAnthony M.1989. “Citizen Participation in Politics.” Pp. 244–63 in Introduction to Political Sociology: The Social Anatomy of the Body Politic.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
70.
PaxtonPamela. 1999. “Is Social Capital Declining in the United States? A Multiple Indicator Assessment.”American Journal of Sociology105:88–127.
71.
PaxtonPamela. 2001. “Social Capital and Democracy: An Interdependent Relationship.” Working paper, Department of Sociology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
72.
PerlmutterTed. 1991. “Italy: Why No Voluntary Sector?” Pp. 157–88 in Between States and Markets: The Voluntary Sector in Comparative Perspective, edited by WuthnowR.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
73.
PortesAlejandro and LandoltPatricia. 1996. “The Downside of Social Capital.”American Prospect26 (May/June):18–21.
74.
PutnamRobert D.2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community.New York: Simon and Schuster.
75.
PutnamRobert D.1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
76.
RamirezFrancisco O., SoysalYasemin, and ShanahanSuzanne. 1998. “The Changing Logic of Political Citizenship: Cross-National Acquisition of Women's Suffrage.”American Sociological Review62:735–45.
77.
RaudenbushStephen, BrykAnthony, CheongYuk Fai, and CongdonRichard. 2000. HLM 5: Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling.Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
78.
RosanvallonPierre. 1990. L'État en France de 1789 à nos jours (The state in France from 1789 to the present). Paris, France: Seuil.
79.
SalamonLester M. and AnheierHelmut K.. 1994. The Emerging Sector: The Nonprofit Sector in Comparative Perspective: An Overview.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Institute for Policy Studies.
80.
SalamonLester M. and AnheierHelmut K.. 1997. “The Civil Society Sector.”Society34:60–65.
81.
SchmitterPhilippe C.1974. “Still the Century of Corporatism?”Review of Politics36:85–131.
82.
SchmitterPhilippe C. and LehmbruchGerhard, eds. 1979. Trends towards Corporatist Intermediation.London, England and Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
83.
ScottJohn C.1957. “Membership and Participation in Voluntary Associations.”American Sociological Review22:315–26.
84.
SewellWilliam H.Jr. 1992. “A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation.”American Journal of Sociology98:1–29.
85.
SkocpolTheda. 1985“Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research.” Pp. 3–43 in Bringing the State Back In, edited by EvansP., RueschemeyerD., and SkocpolT.. New York: Cambridge University Press.
86.
SkocpolTheda. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
87.
SkocpolTheda. 1996. “Unraveling from Above.”The American Prospect25:20–25.
88.
SkocpolTheda. 1997. “The Tocqueville Problem.”Social Science History24:455–79.
89.
SkocpolTheda and FiorinaMorris, eds. 1999. Civic Engagement in American Democracy.Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
90.
SkocpolTheda, GanzMarshal, and MunsonZiah. 2000. “A Nation of Organizers: The Institutional Origins of Civic Voluntarism in the United States.”American Political Science Review94:527–46.
91.
SomersMargaret. 1995. “What Is Political or Cultural about Political Culture and the Public Sphere? Toward an Historical Sociology of Concept Formation.”Sociological Theory13: 113–44.
92.
SomersMargaret. 2001. “Romancing the Market, Reviling the State: Historicizing Liberalism, Privatization, and the Competing Claims to Civil Society.” Pp. 23–48 in Citizenship, Markets, and the State, edited by CrouchC., EderK., and TambiniD.. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
93.
SoysalYasemin. 1994. Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe.Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
94.
SteinmetzGeorge. 1993. Regulating the Social. The Welfare State and Local Politics in Imperial Germany.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
95.
SteinmetzGeorge. 1999. “Introduction: Culture and the State.” Pp. 1–49 in State/Culture: State Formation After the Cultural Turn, edited by SteinmetzG.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
96.
StephensJohn D.1995. “The German Path to Modern Authoritarianism: Germany, Britain and Sweden Compared.” Pp. 161–82 in Politics, Society, and Democracy: Comparative Studies, edited by ChehabiH. E. and StepanA.. Boulder, CO: Westview.
97.
SummersRobert and HestonAlan. 1991. “The Penn World Table (Mark 5): An Expanded Set of International Comparisons, 1950–1988.”Quarterly Journal of Economics106:327–68.
98.
SwidlerAnne. 1986. “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies.”American Sociological Review51:273–86.
99.
TarrowSidney. 1996. “Making Social Science Work Across Space and Time: A Critical Reflection on Robert Putnam'sMaking Democracy Work.” American Political Science Review90:389–97.
100.
TherbornGoran. 1995. European Modernity and Beyond: the Trajectory of European Societies, 1945–2000.London, England and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
101.
ThomasGeorge M., MeyerJohn W., RamirezFrancisco O., and BoliJohn. 1987. Institutional Structure: Constituting State, Society, and Individual.Newberry Park, CA: Sage.
102.
TillyCharles. 1986. The Contentious French: Four Centuries of Popular Struggle.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
103.
TocquevilleAlexis de. [1862] 1945. Democracy in America.New York: Vintage Books.
104.
Van RooyAlison, ed. 1998. Civil Society and the Aid Industry.London, England: Earthscan Publications Ltd.
105.
VeugelersJack and LamontMichele. 1991. “France: Alternative Locations for Public Debate.” Pp. 125–56 in Between States and Markets: the Voluntary Sector in Comparative Perspective, edited by WuthnowR.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
106.
WeberMax. [1922] 1978. Economy and Society.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
107.
WesselsBernhard. 1997. “Organizing Capacities of Societies and Modernity.” Pp. 198–219 in Private Groups and Public Life. Political Involvement in Representative Democracies, edited by van DethJ.. New York: Routledge.
108.
WesternBruce. 1997. Between Class and Market: Postwar Unionization in the Capitalist Democracies.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
109.
WilliamsonPeter. 1985. Varieties of Corporatism. A Conceptual Discussion.Cambridge, England and New York: Cambridge University Press.
110.
World Values Study Group. 1994. World Values Survey, 1981–1984 and 1990–1993.Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
111.
WuthnowRobert. 1991. “Tocqueville's Question Reconsidered: Voluntarism and Public Discourse in Advanced Industrial Societies.” Pp. 288–308 in Between States and Markets: The Voluntary Sector in Comparative Perspective, edited by WuthnowR.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
112.
WuthnowRobert. 1999. “The Changing Character of Social Capital in the United States.” Working Paper, Department of Sociology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
113.
ZaretDavid. 1989. “Religion and the Rise of Liberal-Democratic Ideology in 17th-Century England.”American Sociological Review54:163–79.
