FeathermanDavid L., Lancaster JonesF., and HauserRobert M.. 1975. “Assumptions of Social Mobility Research in the United States: The Case of Occupational Status.”Social Science Research4:329–60.
2.
KalmijnMatthijs. 1991. “Shifting Boundaries: Trends in Religious and Educational Homo-gamy.”American Sociological Review56: 786–800.
3.
KalmijnMatthijs. 1994. “Assortative Mating by Cultural and Economic Occupational Status.”American Journal of Sociology100:422–52.
4.
LipsetSeymour M. and ZetterbergHans L.. 1959. “Social Mobility in Industrialized Societies.” pp. 11–75 in Social Mobility in Industrial Society, edited by LipsetS.M. and BendixR.. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
5.
MareRobert D.1991. “Five Decades of Assortative Mating.”American Sociological Review56:15–32.
6.
Ministry of the Interior, Republic of China.1976. 1975 Taiwan-Fukien Demographic Fact Book, Republic of China.Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of the Interior.
7.
Ministry of the Interior, Republic of China.1991. 1990 Taiwan-Fukien Demographic Fact Book, Republic of China.Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of the Interior.
8.
QianZhenchao. 1997. “Breaking the Racial Barriers: Variations in Interracial Marriage Between 1980 and 1990.”Demography34:263–76.
9.
RafteryAdrian E.1995. “Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research.”Sociological Methodology25:111–63.
10.
SmitsJeroen, UlteeWout, and LammersJan. 1998. “Educational Homogamy in 65 Countries: An Explanation of Differences in Openness Using Country-Level Explanatory Variables.”American Sociological Review63:264–85.
11.
ThorntonArland. 1992. Reading History Sideways: The Negative Influence of the Developmental Paradigm on Family and Demographic Research.Department of Sociology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Unpublished manuscript.
12.
UlteeWout C. and LuijkxRuud. 1990. “Educational Heterogamy and Father-to-Son Occupational Mobility in 23 Industrial Nations: General Societal Openness or Compensatory Strategies of Reproduction?”European Sociological Review6:125–49.
13.
VermuntJeroen. 1997. LEM: A General Program for the Analysis of Categorical Data.Tilburg, Netherlands: Tilburg University.
WongRaymond Sin-Kwok. 1992. “Vertical and Nonvertical Effects in Class Mobility: Cross National Variations.”American Sociological Review57:396–410.
16.
WongRaymond Sin-Kwok and LuHsien-Hen. 1999. “Assortative Mating in Taiwan: Cohort Trends in Educational and Ethnic Intermarriages.”Department of Sociology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA. Unpublished manuscript.
17.
BankWorld. 1980. World Tables: The Second Edition.Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
18.
XieYu. 1992. “The Log-Multiplicative Layer Effect Model for Comparing Mobility Tables.”American Sociological Review57:380–395.
19.
XieYu. 1998. “The Essential Tension between Parsimony and Accuracy.”Sociological Methodology28:231–36.
20.
YamaguchiKazuo. 1987. “Models for Comparing Mobility Tables: Toward Parsimony and Substance.”American Sociological Review52:482–494.