The spatial mismatch hypothesis argues that residential segregation and job decentralization combine to adversely affect the employment opportunities of minorities. While employment is increasingly located outside of central cities, residential segregation prevents minorities from moving closer to suburban jobs. Although this hypothesis has intuitive appeal, there is little consensus regarding its empirical validity. This study (1) constructs detailed geographic measures of changes in employment opportunities, (2) estimates a fixed-effects model of changes in the unemployment rate over time, and (3) accounts for spatial correlation in the error term. Neighborhood-level employment data from 1980 and 1990 are used to measure changes in the distance to jobs from census tracts in the Detroit and Chicago metropolitan areas. In both cities, the decentralization of employment and the loss of manufacturing jobs resulted in substantial changes in the spatial distribution of employment. The empirical results indicate that a decline in the spatial proximity to employment is associated with an increase in the unemployment rate for blacks.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnselinLuc. 1988. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models.Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
2.
AnselinLuc. 1995. SpaceStat: A Software Program for the Analysis of Spatial Data. Version 1.80. Morgantown, WV: Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University.
3.
CohnSamuel and FossettMark. 1996. “What Spatial Mismatch? The Proximity of Blacks to Employment in Boston and Houston.”Social Forces75:557–72.
4.
CoulsonN. Edward and BondEric W.. 1990. “A Hedonic Approach to Residential Succession.”Review of Economics and Statistics72: 433–44.
5.
CresseyPaul F.1938. “Population Succession in Chicago: 1898–1930.”American Journal of Sociology44: 59–69.
6.
Dworak-FisherKeenan. 1997. “Employment Decentralization, Earnings Changes, and Population Movements in U.S. Metropolitan Areas, 1970–1990.”Population Studies Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Unpublished paper.
7.
EllwoodDavid T.1986. “The Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis: Are There Teenage Jobs Missing in the Ghetto?” pp. 147–90 in The Black Youth Employment Crisis, edited by FreemanR. B. and HolzerH.. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8.
FernandezRoberto. 1994. “Race, Space, and Job Accessibility: Evidence from a Plant Relocation.”Economic Geography70:390–416.
GrigsbyWilliam, BaratzMorton, GalsterGeorge, and MaclennanDuncan. 1987. “The Dynamics of Neighborhood Change and Decline.”Progress in Planning28:1–76.
11.
GuestAvery. 1974. “Neighborhood Life Cycles and Social Status.”Economic Geography48: 375–87.
12.
HarryHolzer and IhlanfeldtKeith. 1997. Customer Discrimination and Employment Outcomes for Minority Workers. Discussion Paper no. 1122–97, Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
13.
HolzerHarry J.1991. “The Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis: What Has the Evidence Shown.”Urban Studies28:105–22.
14.
HooverEdgar M. and VernonRaymond. 1959. Anatomy of a Metropolis.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
HutchinsonPeter. 1974. “The Effects of Accessibility and Segregation on the Employment of the Urban Poor.” pp. 77–96 in Patterns of Racial Discrimination, vol 1, edited by von FurstenbergG. M., HarrisonB., and HorowitzA. R.. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
16.
IhlanfeldtKeith and SjoquistDavid L.. 1990. “Job Accessibility and Racial Differences in Youth Employment Rates.”American Economic Review80:267–76.
17.
IhlanfeldtKeith and SjoquistDavid L.. 1991. “The Effect of Job Access on Black and White Youth Employment: A Cross Sectional Analysis.”Urban Studies28:255–65.
18.
JencksChristopher and MayerSusan E.. 1990. “Residential Segregation, Job Proximity, and Black Job Opportunities.” pp. 187–222 in Inner-City Poverty in the United States.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
19.
KainJohn F.1968. “Housing Segregation, Negro Employment, and Metropolitan Decentralization.”Quarterly Journal of Economics82: 165–97.
20.
KasardaJohn. 1995. “Industrial Restructuring and the Changing Location of Jobs.” pp. 215–67 in State of the Union: America in the 1990s.New York: Russell Sage.
21.
KmentaJan. 1986. Elements of Econometrics-NewYork: Macmillan.
22.
LeonardJonathan. 1987. “The Interaction of Residential Segregation and Employment Discrimination.”Journal of Urban Economics21: 323–46.
23.
MasseyDouglas and DentonNancy. 1993. American Apartheid.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
MuthRichard F.1969. Cities and Housing.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
OfnerPaul and SaksDaniel H.. 1971. “A Note on John Kain's ‘Housing Segregation, Negro Employment and Metropolitan Decentralization.”’Quarterly Journal of Economics85: 147–60.
26.
OrdKeith. 1975. “Estimation Methods for Models of Spatial Interaction.”Journal of the American Statistical Association70:120–26.
27.
QuigleyJohn M.1978. “Housing Markets and Housing Demand: Analytic Approaches.” pp. 23–44 in Urban Housing Markets: Recent Directions in Research and Policy.Toronto, Ontario: University of Toronto Press.
28.
RaphaelSteven. 1998. “The Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis and Black Youth Joblessness: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area.”Journal of Urban Economics43:79–113.
29.
RothenbergJerome, GalsterGeorge, ButlerRichard, and PitkinJohn. 1991. The Maze of Urban Housing Markets.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
30.
SchwirianKen P.1983. “Models of Neighborhood Change.”Annual Review of Sociology9:83–102.
31.
SimpsonWayne. 1992. Urban Structure and the Labour Market.Oxford, England: Clarendon.
32.
StollMichael A.1996. “Distance or Discrimination? The Convergence of Space and Race in Understanding Metropolitan Racial Differences in Employment.”SAGE Race Relations21(4):3–25.
33.
StruykRaymond and FixBenjamin. 1993. Clear and Convincing Evidence: Measurement of Discrimination in America.Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
34.
U.S. Bureau of the Census.1991. State and Metropolitan Area Data Book.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
35.
WilsonWilliam Julius. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
36.
WilsonWilliam Julius. 1996. When Work Disappears.New York: Alfred Knopf.
37.
ZaxJefferey S.1991. “The Substitution between Moves and Quits.”The Economic Journal101: 1510–21.
38.
ZaxJefrey S. and KainJohn F.. 1996. “Moving to the Suburbs: Do Relocating Companies Leave Their Black Employees Behind.”Journal of Labor Economics14:472–504.
