Demographic histories of top television station managers are examined to determine how they affect the rate of managerial turnover. Past research using cross-sectional data has found a positive association between contemporaneous levels of demographic heterogeneity and managerial turnover rates. However, by ignoring changes over time in group composition, such models implicitly assume that individuals “forget” their past demographic experiences. This analysis of the effect of group tenure heterogeneity over time on managers’ turnover rates suggests otherwise. The results indicate that individuals who have been members of heterogeneous groups throughout their tenure were more likely to exit the team; the current tenure composition of the group generally did not affect turnover rates. Sociologists interested in how groups affect individual behavior therefore should attend not only to contemporaneous social structures but also to the paths of change that generated those conditions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BergThomas R.1991. “The Importance of Equity Perception and Job Satisfaction in Predicting Employee Intent to Stay at Television Stations.”Group and Organization Studies16: 268–84.
2.
BerscheidEllen and WalsterElaine Hatfield. 1978. Interpersonal Attraction.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3.
BlauPeter M.1977. Inequality and Heterogeneity.New York: Free Press.
4.
BlossfeldHans-Peter and RohwerGötz. 1995. Techniques of Event History Modeling: New Approaches to Causal Analysis.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
CarrollGlenn R. and MayerKarl Ulrich. 1986. “Job-Shift Patterns in the Federal Republic of Germany: The Effects of Social Class, Industrial Sector, and Organizational Size.”American Sociological Review51:323–41.
6.
CarrollGlenn R. and Richard HarrisonJ.. 1998. “Organizational Demography and Culture: Insights from a Formal Model and Simulation.”Administrative Science Quarterly43:637–67.
7.
DavernMichael. 1999. “Social Network Structure and Job Mobility: Using Television Station Managers to Tell the Story.” Ph.D. dissertation, Departmenr of Sociology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN.
8.
DiPreteThomas A. and KreckerMargaret L.. 1991. “Occupational Linkages and Job Mobility within and across Organizations.”Research in Social Stratification and Mobility10:91–131.
9.
EastmanSusan Tyler, HeadSydney W., and KleinLewis. 1989. Broadcast/Cable Programming: Strategies and Practices.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
10.
EisenhardtKathleen M. and SchoonhovenClaudia Bird. 1990. “Organizational Growth: Linking Founding Team, Strategy, Environment, and Growth among U.S. Semiconductor Ventures, 1978–1988.”Administrative Science Quarterly35:504–29.
11.
EvanWilliam M.1963. “Peer-Group Interaction and Organizational Socialization: A Study of Employee Turnover.”American Sociological Review28:436–40.
12.
FestingerLeon. 1954. “A Theory of Social Comparison Processes.”Human Relations1:117–40.
13.
FirebaughGlenn and ChenKevin. 1995. “Vote Turnout of Nineteenth Amendment Women: The Enduring Effect of Disenfranchisement.”American Journal of Sociology100:972–96.
14.
GallerHeinz P. and PötterUlrich. 1990. “Unobserved Heterogeneity in Models of Unemployment Duration.” pp. 226–40 in Event History Analysis in Life Course Research, edited by MayerK. U. and TumaN. B.. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
15.
HambrickDonald C. and MasonPhyllis A.. 1984. “Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers.”Academy of Management Review9:193–206.
16.
HambrickDonald C., ChoTheresa Sung, and ChenMing-Jer. 1996. “The Influence of Top Management Heterogeneity on Firms' Competitive Moves.”Administrative Science Quarterly41:659–84.
17.
HannanMichael T. and CarrollGlenn R.. 1992. Dynamics of Organizational Populations.New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
HeckmanJames J. and BorjasGeorge. 1980. “Does Unemployment Cause Future Unemployment? Definitions, Questions and Answers from a Continuous Time Model of Heterogeneity and State Dependence.”Economica47: 247–83.
19.
HomansGeorge. 1950. The Human Group.New York: Harcourt, Brace.
20.
LawlerEdward J. and YoonJoengkoo. 1998. “Network Structure and Emotion in Exchange Relations.”American Sociological Review63:871–94.
21.
McCainBruce, O'ReillyCharles A., and PfefferJeffrey. 1983. “The Effects of Departmental Demography on Turnover.”Administrative Science Quarterly26:626–41.
22.
O'ReillyCharles A., CaldwellDavid F., and BarnettWilliam P.. 1989. “Work Group Demography, Social Integration, and Turnover.”Administrative Science Quarterly34:21–37.
23.
PfefferJeffrey. 1983. “Organizational Demography.” pp. 299–357 in Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 5, edited by CummingsL. L. and StawB. M.. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
24.
RyderNorman B.1965. “The Cohort as a Concept in the Study of Social Change.”American Sociological Review30:843–61.
25.
WagnerW. Gary, PfefferJeffrey, and O'ReillyCharles A.. 1984. “Organizational Demography and Turnover in Top Management Groups.”Administrative Science Quarterly29:74–92.
26.
WiersemaMargarethe and BantelKaren. 1993. “Top Management Team Turnover as an Adaptation Mechanism: The Role of the Environment.”Strategic Management Journal14: 485–504.
27.
WilliamsKatherine Y. and O'ReillyCharles A.. 1998. “Demography and Diversity in Organizations: A Review of 40 Years of Research.”Research in Organizational Behavior20:77–140.
