Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Use of the couch in the analytic situation has a unique impact on the consciousness of both participants in the process. The hypnagogic state of the supine analysand and its resonance with the empathic reverie of the unseen analyst are explored, with a focus not on the contents of analysts' countertransferential associations, but on the diverse but converging modes in which they represent their patients' verbal productions. A clinical example is presented to illustrate the interplay between the patient's and the analyst's imaginations, an understanding of which does away with the false dichotomy between defense analysis and empathic responsiveness. The importance of a patient's conscious and preconscious defenses in the here-and-now transference (suppression, “marginalization,” disavowal, negation) is also noted, as is the relation of these defenses to unconscious secondary repression.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arlow, J. (1980). The genesis of interpretation. In Psychoanalytic Exploration of Technique: Discourse in the Theory of Therapy . New York: International Universities Press, ed. H. Blum , pp.193—206.

Bloom, H. (1973). Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry. New York: Oxford University Press.

Brenner, C. (1976). Psychoanalytic Technique and Psychic Conflict . New York: International Universities Press.

Erikson, E.H. (1954). The dream specimen in psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 2:5—56.

Fisher, C. (1965). Psychoanalytic implications of recent research on sleep and dreaming: 1. Empirical findings. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 13:197—270.

——— & Friedman, S. (1960). Further observations on primary modes of perception: The use of a masking technique for subliminal visual stimulation. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 8:100—129.

——— & Paul, I.H. (1959). The effect of subliminal visual stimulation on images and dreams: A validation study. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 7:35—79.

Freud, A. (1936). The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defense. New York: International Universities Press, 1966.

Freud, S. (1900). The interpretation of dreams. Standard Edition 4/5.

10.

——— (1911). Papers on technique. Standard Edition 12:85—340.

11.

———( 1926). Inhibitions, symptoms and anxiety. Standard Edition 20:81—174.

12.

Gray, P. (1994). The Ego and the Analysis of Defense. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.

13.

Hartmann, H. (1939). Ego Psychology and the Problem of Adaptation. New York: International Universities Press.

14.

Inhelder, B. , & Piaget, J. (1958). The Growth of Logical Thinking from Childhood to Adolescence, transl. A. Parsons & S. Milgram. New York: Basic Books.

15.

Jacobs, T. (1991). The Uses of the Self. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.

16.

James, W. (1902). The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature. New York: Doubleday .

17.

Klein, G. (1970). Perception, Motives, and Personality. New York: Knopf.

18.

Lewin, B.D. (1955). Dream psychology and the analytic situation. Psychoanalytic Quarterly 24:169—199.

19.

Moore, B.F. , & Fine, B.D. (1990). Glossary of Psychoanalytic Terms and Concepts . New Haven: Yale University Press / American Psychoanalytic Association.

20.

Moraitis, G. , (1995). The couch as a protective shield for the analyst . Psychoanalytic Inquiry 15:406—412.

21.

Rosen, V. (1974). The nature of verbal interventions in psychoanalysis . Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Science 3:189—209.

22.

Stein, M. (1965). States of consciousness in the analytic situation . In Drives, Affects , Behavior , ed. M. Schur. New York: International Universities Press, pp. 60—86.

Once More Onto the Couch: Consciousness and Preconscious Defenses in Psychoanalysis

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References