Enacted processes—variously addressed in the current literature by such terms as enactment, actualization, and interaction—represent the conceptual reuniting of Freud's concepts of transference and acting out. These various concepts include a recognition that transference may be represented not only on the verbally symbolized level but also on the enacted level, through psychic organizations and processes that use behavior, silence, and even speech as symbolic vehicles. Countertransference too finds representation within the enacted realm, in response to and in concert with the patient's enacted processes, though in more attenuated fashion. Enacted transference-countertransference processes are conceptualized as a continuously evolving second dimension of analytic treatment. This enacted dimension of analytic process exists alongside, and inextricably interwoven with, the treatment's verbal content, with characteristics unique to each analytic dyad. It occurs naturally and inevitably, without conscious awareness or intent, and is outside the domain of explicit technical interventions. The observable outcroppings or end points of processes within the enacted dimension are what are currently referred to as enactments. Attention to these unintended but meaningful and often elaborately developed characteristics of the treatment process furthers our understanding of the therapeutic action of psychoanalysis. The process of integrating the enacted with the verbal dimension of treatment enables the analysand to achieve higher levels of psychic organization.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abend, S.M. (1989). Countertransference and psychoanalytic technique . Psychoanalytic Quarterly58:374—395.
2.
——— (1993). An inquiry into the fate of the transference in psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association41:627—651.
3.
Alexander, F. (1950). Analysis of the therapeutic factors in psychoanalytic treatment. Psychoanalytic Quarterly19:482—500.
4.
Altschul, S. (1968). Denial and ego arrest. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association16:301—318.
5.
Anthi, P.R. (1983). Reconstruction of preverbal experience. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association31:33—59.
6.
Bion, W. (1959). Attacks on linking. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis40:308—315.
7.
Blum, H. (1983). The splitting of the ego and its relation to parent loss. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association31 (suppl.): 301—324.
8.
Boesky, D. (1982). Acting out: A reconsideration of the concept. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis63:39—55.
9.
——— (1990). The psychoanalytic process and its components . Psychoanalytic Quarterly59:550—584.
10.
Busch, F. (1989). The compulsion to repeat in action: A developmental perspective. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis70:535—544.
11.
——— (1995). Do actions speak louder than words? A query into an enigma in analytic theory and technique. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association43:61—82.
12.
Casement, P. (1982). Some pressures on the analyst for physical contact during the re-living of an early trauma. International Review of Psychoanalysis9:279— 286.
13.
Chused, J.( 1991). The evocative power of enactments. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association39:615—639.
14.
——— (1996). The therapeutic action of psychoanalysis: Abstinence and informative experiences. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association44:1047—1071.
15.
Dowling, S. (1982). Dreams and dreaming in relation to trauma in childhood . International Journal of Psycho-Analysis63:157—166.
16.
Dunn, J.( 1995). Intersubjectivity in psychoanalysis: A critical review . International Journal of Psycho-Analysis76:723—738.
17.
Eagle, M., & Wolitzky, D. (1986). Book review: The Process of Psychoanalytic Therapy: Models and Strategies by E. Peterfreund. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought9:79—102.
18.
Ekstein, R. (1965). A general treatment philosophy concerning acting out. In Acting Out: Theoretical and Clinical Aspects, ed. L. Abt & S. Weissman.New York: Grune & Stratton, pp. 162—172.
19.
Erdelyi, M. (1974). A new look at the new look: Perceptual defense and vigilance. Psychological Review81:1—25.
20.
Freedman, N. (1994). More on transformation: Enactments in psychoanalytic space. In The Spectrum of Psychoanalysis: Essays in Honor of Martin Bergmann, ed. A.D. Richards & A.K. Richards.Madison, CT: International Universities Press, pp. 93—110.
21.
Freud, S. (1905). Fragment of an analysis of a case of hysteria . Standard Edition7:7—122.
22.
——— (1910). Future prospects for psycho-analytic therapy. Standard Edition11:139—152.
23.
——— (1912a). The dynamics of transference. Standard Edition12:97—108.
24.
——— (1912b). Recommendations to physicians practising psychoanalysis . Standard Edition12:111—120.
25.
——— (1914). Remembering, repeating and working-through. Standard Edition12:147—156.
26.
——— (1915a). Observations on transference-love. Standard Edition12:157—175.
27.
——— (1915b). The unconscious. Standard Edition14:159—216.
28.
——— (1920). Beyond the pleasure principle. Standard Edition18:1—64.
29.
——— (1940). An outline of psycho-analysis. Standard Edition23:141—208.
30.
Gabbard, G.O. (1995). Countertransference: The emerging common ground . International Journal of Psycho-Analysis76:475—485.
31.
Hartmann, H. (1964). On rational and irrational action. In Essays on Ego Psychology. New York: International Universities Press, pp. 37—68.
32.
Heimann, P. (1950). On counter-transference. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis31:81—84.
33.
Hoffman, I.Z. (1991). Discussion: Toward a social-constructivist view of the psychoanalytic situation. Psychoanalytic Dialogues1:74—105.
34.
——— (1992). Some practical implications of a social-constructivist view of the psychoanalytic situation. Psychoanalytic Dialogues2:287—304.
35.
Hurst, D. (1995). Panel report: Toward a definition of the term and concept of interaction. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association43:517—537.
36.
Jacobs, T. (1986). Countertransference enactments. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association34:289—307.
37.
——— (1991). The interplay of enactments: Their role in the analytic process. In The Use of the Self: Countertransference and Communication in the Analytic Situation. Madison, CT : International Universities Press, pp. 31—49.
38.
——— (1993). Insight and experience: Commentary on Morris Eagle's “Enactment, transference, and symptomatic cure.”Psychoanalytic Dialogues3:123—127.
39.
——— (1994). Nonverbal communications. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association42:741—762.
40.
Johan, M. (1992). Panel report: Enactments in psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association40:827—841.
41.
Joseph, B. (1989). Psychic Equilibrium and Psychic Change: Selected Papers of Betty Joseph, ed. E.B. Spillius & M. Feldman.London: Tavistock/Routledge.
42.
Kanzer, M. (1966). The motor sphere of the transference. Psychoanalytic Quarterly35:522—539.
43.
Katz, G. (1993). A death in the countertransference: A patient's unconscious enactment of object loss in the analytic relationship. Presented to the Division of Psychoanalysis (39), American Psychological Association, New York City.
44.
Kern, J. (1987). Transference neurosis as a waking dream: Notes on a clinical enigma. Journal oftheAmerican PsychoanalyticAssociation35:337—366.
45.
Kernberg, O. (1965). Notes on countertransference. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association13:38—56.
46.
Klein, M. (1946). Notes on some schizoid mechanisms. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis27:99—110.
47.
Laplanche, J., & Pontalis, J.-B. (1967). The Language of Psycho-Analysis , transl. D. Nicholson-Smith. New York: Norton, 1973.
48.
Lasky, R. (1993). Countertransference and the analytic instrument . In Dynamics of Development and the Therapeutic Process. Northvale, NJ: Aronson, pp. 263—296.
49.
Loewald, H. (1960). On the therapeutic action of psychoanalysis. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis41:167—33.
50.
——— (1970). Psychoanalytic theory and the psychoanalytic process . In Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven : Yale University Press, 1980, pp. 277—301.
51.
——— ( 1971). Some considerations on repetition and repetition compulsion. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis52:59—66.
52.
——— (1975). Psychoanalysis as an art and the fantasy character of the psychoanalytic situation. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association23:277—299.
53.
——— (1976). Perspectives on memory. In Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980, pp. 148—173.
54.
——— (1980). Reflections on the psychoanalytic process and its therapeutic potential. In Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 372—383.
55.
——— (1986). Transference-countertransference. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association34:275—287.
56.
Mclaughlin, J.T. (1987). The play of transference: Some reflections on enactment in the psychoanalytic situation. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association35:557—582.
57.
——— (1991). Clinical and theoretical aspects of enactment . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association39:595—614.
58.
Opatow, B. (1996). Panel report: Meaning in the clinical moment. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association44:639—648.
59.
Poland, W.S. (1992a). From analytic surface to analytic space. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association40:381—404.
60.
———( 1992b). Transference: “An original creation. ” Psychoanalytic Quarterly61:185—205.
61.
Purcell, S. (1995). Panel report: Interpretive perspectives of interaction . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association43:539—551.
62.
Racker, H. (1957). The meanings and uses of countertransference. Psychoanalytic Quarterly26:303—357.
63.
Rangell, L. (1989). Action theory within the structural view. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis70:189—203.
64.
Renik, O. (1993a). Analytic interaction: Conceptualizing technique in light of the analyst's irreducible subjectivity. Psychoanalytic Quarterly62:553—571.
65.
——— (1993b). Countertransference enactment and the psychoanalytic process. In Psychic Structure and Psychic Change: Essays in Honor of Robert S. Wallerstein, M.D., ed. M.J. Horowitz, O.F. Kernberg, & E.M. Weinshel.Madison CT: International Universities Press, pp. 135—158.
66.
Roughton, R.E. (1993). Useful aspects of acting out: Repetition, enactment, and actualization. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association41:443—472.
67.
——— (1996). Action and acting out. In Psychoanalysis: The Major Concepts, ed. B.E. Moore.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
68.
Sandler, J. (1976). Countertransference and role-responsiveness. International Review of Psycho-Analysis3:43—47.
69.
——— (1993). On communication from patient to analyst: Not everything is projective identification. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis74:1097—1107.
70.
Schafer, R. (1998). The Contemporary Kleinians of London. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
71.
Smith, H. (1993). Engagements in the analytic work. Psychoanalytic Inquiry13:425—454.
72.
Spillius, E.B. (1992). Clinical experiences of projective identification . In Clinical Lectures on Klein and Bion, ed. R. Anderson.London: Tavistock/ Routledge, pp. 59—73.
73.
Steingart, I. (1995). A Thing Apart. Northvale, NJ : Aronson.
74.
Tower, L.E. (1956). Countertransference. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association4:224—255.
75.
Winnicott, D.W. (1963). Dependence in infant-care, in child-care, and in the psycho-analytical setting. In The Maturational Process and the Facilitating Environment. London: Hogarth Press, 1965, pp. 249—259.
