Arlow, J.A. (1979). The genesis of interpretation. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association27(suppl.):193—206.
2.
Casement, P.J. (1982). Some pressures on the analyst for physical contact during the reliving of an early trauma. International Review of Psycho-Analysis9:279—286.
3.
Edelson, M. (1984). Hypothesis and Evidence in Psychoanalysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Fenichel, O. (1938). Problems of psychoanalytic technique. Psychoanalytic Quarterly7:421—442.
5.
Fox, R. ( 1984). The principle of abstinence reconsidered. International Review of Psycho-Analysis11:227—236.
6.
Grossman, W. (1995a). Psychoanalysis as science: Discussion. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association4:1004—1014.
7.
——— (1995b). Psychological vicissitudes of theory in psychoanalysis . International Journal of Psycho-Analysis76:885—900.
8.
Hanly, C. (1992). The Problem of Truth in Applied Psychoanalysis . New York: Guilford Press.
9.
——— (1995). On facts and ideas in psychoanalysis. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis76:901—908.
10.
Hoffer, A. (1991). The Freud-Ferenczi controversy: A living legacy . International Review of Psycho-Analysis18:465—472.
11.
Meissner, W.W. (1996). The Therapeutic Alliance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
12.
Rangell, L. (1988). The future of psychoanalysis: The scientific crossroads . Psychoanalytic Quarterly33:59—92.
13.
Renik, O. (1998). The subjectivity and objectivity of the psychoanalyst . International Journal of Psycho-Analysis.
14.
Roughton, R. (1993). Useful aspects of acting out: Repetition, enactment, and actualizationJournal of the American Psychoanalytic Association41:443—472.
15.
Spence, D. (1998). Guest Editorial: Rain forest or mud field?International Journal of Psycho-Analysis79:643—648.
16.
Weinberg, S. (1998). The revolution that didn't happen. New York Review of Books45(15):48—52, October 8.