A close look at Gedo's recent paper on working through reveals a number of devices used in the development of competing psychoanalytic theories, devices which result in analysts talking past each other. Starting with the notion that all theorists “misread” their predecessors, the author examines how different views of the past create confusion in the dialogue between Gedo and his commentators. He then takes up the issue of how data emerging from the neurosciences can be used to support many different psychoanalytic theories and suggests that there will always be a “metaphorical leap” from one frame of reference to the other. Finally, he examines how the drawing of sharp dichotomies both within a theory and between one theory and another misrepresents analytic work and exaggerates differences between one point of view and another. Thus, various devices that are used to buttress one version of analytic theory make it more difficult to develop a more integrated theory and to correlate psychoanalytic data with those emerging from the neurosciences.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andreasen, N.C., O'Leary, D.S., Cizadlo, T., Arndt, S.Rezai, K., Watkins, G.L., Ponto, L.L.B., Hichwa, R.D. (1995). Remembering the past: Two facets of episodic memory explored with positron emission tomography. American Journal of Psychiatry152:1576—1585.
2.
Arlow, J.A. (1969). Unconscious fantasy and disturbances of conscious experience. Psychoanalytic Quarterly38:1—27.
3.
——— (1979). Metaphor and the psychoanalytic situation. Psychoanalytic Quarterly48:363—385.
4.
Bloom, H. (1973). The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry. London: Oxford University. Press.
5.
——— (1994). The Western Canon: The Books and Schools of the Ages. New York: Harcourt Brace.
6.
Boesky, D. (1988). The concept of psychic structure. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association36 (Suppl):113—135.
7.
——— (1988). A discussion of evidential criteria for therapeutic change. In How Does Treatment Help? On the Modes of Therapeutic Action of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, ed. A. Rothstein.Madison, CT: International Universities Press, pp. 171—180.
8.
——— (1994). Discussion of “Consequences of Childhood Abuse: Fantasy and Reality.” Seminars for Clinicians, Miami, October 15—16.
9.
——— (1995). Commentary on Gedo's “Working through as metaphor and as a modality of treatment.”Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association43:356—360.
10.
Brenner, C. (1987). Working through: 1914—1984. Psychoanalytic Quarterly56:88—108.
11.
——— (1994). The mind as conflict and compromise formation . Journal of Clinical Psychoanalysis3:473—505.
12.
Edelman, G. (1992). Bright Air, Brilliant Fire: On the Matter of the Mind. New York: Basic Books.
13.
Freud, A. (1974). A psychoanalytic view of developmental psychopathology . Writings, Vol. 8. Madison, CT: International Universities Press, 1981, pp. 57—74.
14.
Freud, S. (1914). Remembering, repeating and working-through. Standard Edition12:147-156.
15.
——— (1940). An outline of psycho-analysis. Standard Edition23:144-207.
Gedo, J.E. (1991). Between prolixity and reductionism: psychoanalytic theory and Occam's razor. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association39:71—86.
18.
——— (1995a). Encore. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association43:384—392.
19.
——— (1995b). Working through as metaphor and as a modality of treatment. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association43:339—356.
20.
Grossman, W. (1995). Commentary on Shevrin's “Is psychoanalysis one science, two sciences, or no science at all?” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association43:1004—1015.
21.
Joseph, B. (1985). Transference: the total situation. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis66:447—454.
22.
Kris, E. (1956). The recovery of childhood memories in psychoanalysis . Psychoanalytic Study of the Child11:54—88.
23.
Modell, A.H. (1995). Commentary on Gedo's “Working through as metaphor and as a modality of treatment.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association43:365—368.
24.
——— (in press). Metaphor and mind. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association.
25.
Richards, A.D. (1995). A. A. Brill: The politics of exclusion and the politics of pluralism, A.A. Brill Lecture, New York Psychoanalytic Society, November 28.
26.
Rothstein, A. (1995). Commentary on Gedo's “Working through as metaphor and as a modality of treatment.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association43:368—372.
27.
Shevrin, H. (1995). Is psychoanalysis one science, two sciences, or no science at all? A discourse among friendly antagonists. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association43:963—986.
28.
Slap, J.W., & Levine, F.J. (1978). On hybrid concepts in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Quarterly47:499—523.
29.
Smith, H.F. (1990). Review of How Does Treatment Help? On the Modes of Action of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, ed. A. Rothstein. Psychoanalytic Books1:173—182.
30.
——— (1992). Screen language and developmental metaphor. Annual of Psychoanalysis20:95—113.
31.
——— (1995a). Analytic listening and the experience of surprise . International Journal of Psycho-Analysis76:67—78.
32.
——— (1995b). Introduction: Gedo and Freud on working through . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association43:331—337.
33.
——— (1997). Letter. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association44:649—650.
34.
Solms, M. (1995). Commentary on Shevrin's “Is psychoanalysis one science, two sciences, or no science at all?” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association43:1028—1035.
35.
——— (in press). What is consciousness?Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association.
36.
Stone, L. (1981). Noninterpretive elements in the psychoanalytic situationJournal of the American Psychoanalytic Association29:89—118.
37.
Spezzano, C. (1996). Creating American psychoanalysis: Are we a paradigm yet? Do we really want to be one?Paper presented at Annual meeting, Division 39, American Psychological Association, New York, April 21.
38.
Valenstein, A.F. (1993). Discussion. Psychoanalytic Society of New England, East, February 6.
39.
——— (1995). Commentary on Gedo's “Working through as metaphor and as a modality of treatment.”Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association43:378—384.
