The American Psychoanalytic Association does not intend this Practice Bulletin to state or serve as a standard of practice for mental health care. It is intended as a guideline only. The ultimate judgment regarding a particular clinical decision or method of intervention or overall treatment plan will be made by the practitioner on the basis of the clinical data presented by the patient and the diagnostic and treatment options available in the particular clinical setting.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams-Silvan, A. (1993). The transformation of the listening process into a therapeutic instrument with special reference to analytic memory. J. Clin. Psychoanal., 2:513—527.
2.
Altschul, S. et al. (1986). Reporting Information for Claims Review of Psychoanalysis. New York: American Psychoanalytic Association.
3.
Ampra (1992). Principles of Medical Record Documentation. American Health Information Management Association.
4.
Anonymous (1993). Mental Health Review Guidelines. Alexandria, VA: Health Management Strategies International.
5.
Bachrach, H. et al. (1991). On the efficacy of psychoanalysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 39:871—916.
6.
Beigler, J. (1979). The APA model law on confidentiality. Amer. J. Psychiat., 136:71—73.
7.
Berwick, D. (1994). Eleven worthy aims for clinical leadership of health system reform. J. Amer. Medical Assn., 272:797.
8.
Bibring, E. (1954). Psychoanalysis and the dynamic psychotherapies . J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 2:745—770.
9.
Board of Professional Affairs, Committee on Professional Standards, American Psychological Association (1987). General Guidelines for Providers of Psychological Services. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .
10.
Borenstein, D. (1985). Confidentiality. In Psychiatric Peer Review: Prelude and Promise, ed. J. Hamilton.Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, pp. 175—200.
11.
Committee on Peer Review, American Psychoanalytic Association (1981). Psychoanalytic peer review. In Peer Review Committee of the American Psychiatric Association Manual of Psychiatric Peer Review. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1985, 23—41.
12.
Committee on Peer Review, American Psychoanalytic Association (1990). Reporting Information for Claims Review of Psychoanalysis (revised) In Manual of Psychiatric Quality Assurance. ed. M. Mattson.Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press1992, pp. 237—238.
13.
Eissler, K. (1979). Possible endangerment of psychoanalysis in the United States. Int. Rev. Psychoanal., 6:15—21.
14.
Etchegoyen, R. (1991). The Fundamentals of Psychoanalytic Technique. London: Karnak, pp. 232—258.
15.
Freud, A. (1950 [1938]). The problem of training analysis. The Writings of Anna Freud, Vol. 4. New York: Int. Univ. Press, 1968 , p. 417n.
16.
Freud, S. (1913). On beginning the treatment. S. E., 12:121—144.
17.
Gottschalk, L. & Whitman, R. (1962). Some typical complications mobilized by the psychoanalytic procedure. Int. J. Psychoanal., 43:142—150.
18.
Gray, O. (1980). Possible endangerment of psychoanalysis in the United States. Int. Rev. Psychoanal. 7:406.
19.
Gray, S. (1992). Quality assurance and utilization review of individual medical psychotherapies. In Manual of Psychiatric Quality Assurance Review., ed. M. Mattson.Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1992, pp. 159—166.
20.
Klumpner, G. & Frank, A. (1991). On methods of reporting clinical material. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 39:537—551.
21.
Lipton, E. (1991). The analyst's use of clinical data, and other issues of confidentiality. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 39:967—985.
22.
Loewald, H. (1972). Perspectives on memory. In Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.
23.
Malcolm, J. (1986). Treatment choices and informed consent in psychiatry: implications of the Osheroff case for the profession. J. Psychiat. & Law, 14:9—107.
24.
Marill, I. (1993). Technique revisited: the advent of the third-party payer. The American Psychoanalyst, 27(3):13—14.
25.
Norman, H. et al. (1976). The fate of the transference neurosis after termination of a satisfactory analysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 24:819—844.
26.
Pfeffer, A. (1959). A procedure for evaluating the results of psychoanalysis: a preliminary report. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 7:418—444.
27.
Stein, M. (1988a). Writing about psychoanalysis: I. Analysts who write and those who do not. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 36:105—124.
28.
———. (1988b). Writing about psychoanalysis: II. Analysts who write, patients who read. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 36:393—408.
29.
Task Force on Informed Consent to Review, American Psychoanalytic Association (1991). Report to Executive Council, December 19, 1991.
30.
Tower, L. (1960). Confidentiality in psychoanalysis. Paper presented to the Chicago Psychoanalytic Society, November 22, 1960.
31.
Wallerstein, R. (1988). Psychoanalysis, psychoanalytic science, and psychoanalytic research—1986. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 36:3—30.
32.
Weiss, J. (1971). The emergence of new themes: a contribution to the psychoanalytic theory of therapy. Int. J. Psychoanal., 52:459—468.
33.
Zetzel, E. (1970). The analytic situation and the analytic process . In The Capacity for Emotional Growth., New York: Int. Univ. Press, pp. 197—215.
