Psychoanalytic process is defined as the interaction between the psychoanalyst and the patient, primarily through the interplay of transference and resistance. Transference and resistance are understood as a unitary phenomenon that can be expressed either as an intrapsychic potential or as an interpersonal relationship.
One of the aims of psychoanalytic technique is to encourage, through interpretation, the expression of transference and resistance potential as an interpersonal relationship with the analyst This promotes a fluidity of interchange between the intrapsychic and the interpersonal, leading to heightened interactions between analyst and patient. These interactions become a powerful tool to fully experience unconscious intrapsychic conflict and can be translated back into insight concerning intrapsychic conflict.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AronL. (1991). The patient's experience of the analyst's subjectivity. Psychoanal. Dial., 1:29–51.
2.
BalterL.LohaneZ.SpencerJ.H. (1980). On the analyzing instrument. Psychoanal. Q., 49:474–504.
3.
BeresD.ArlowJ.A. (1974). Fantasy and identification in empathy. Psychoanal. Q., 43:26–50.
4.
BirdB. (1972). Notes on transference. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 20:267–301.
5.
BoeskyD. (1982). Acting out: a reconsideration of the concept. Int. J. Psychoanal., 63:39–55.
6.
BoeskyD. (1990). The psychoanalytic process and its components. Psychoanal. Q., 59:550–584.
7.
ChusedJ.F. (1991). The evocative power of enactments. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 39:615–639.
8.
ChusedJ.F. (1992). The patient's perception of the analyst: the hidden transference. Psychoanal. Q., 61:161–184.
DewaldP.A. (1978). The psychoanalytic process in adult patients. Psychoanal. Study Child, 33:323–332.
11.
DewaldP.A. (1990). Conceptualizations of the psychoanalytic process. Psychoanal. Q., 59:693–711.
12.
FreudA. (1936). The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defense.New York: Int. Univ. Press, 1966.
13.
FreudS. (1893). Studies on hysteria. S.E., 2.
14.
FreudS. (1899). Screen memories. S.E., 3:299–322.
15.
FreudS. (1900). The interpretation of dreams. S.E., 4–5.
16.
FreudS. (1912) The dynamics of transference. S.E., 12:97–108.
17.
FreudS. (1920). Beyond the pleasure principle. S.E., 18:1–64.
18.
FreudS. (1921). Introduction to J. Varendonck's The Psychology of Day-Dreams. S.E., 18:271–272.
19.
FreudS. (1926). Inhibitions, symptoms and anxiety. S.E., 20:75–172.
20.
GillM.M. (1982). Analysis of Transference, Vol. 1. New York: Int. Univ. Press.
21.
GillM.M. (1994). Psychoanalysis in Transition.Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
22.
GrayP. (1973). Psychoanalytic technique and the ego's capacity for viewing intrapsychic activity. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 21:474–494.
23.
GrayP. (1982). “Developmental lag” in the evolution of technique for psychoanalysis of neurotic conflict. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 30:621–655.
24.
GrayP. (1987). On the technique of analysis of the superego—an introduction. Psychoanal. Q., 56:130–154.
25.
GreensonR.R. (1967). The Technique and Practice of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 1. New York: Int. Univ. Press.
26.
HoffmanI. (1983). The patient as interpreter of the analyst's experience. Contemp. Psychoanal., 19:389–422.
27.
HoffmanI. (1991). Discussion: toward a social-constructivist view of the psychoanalytic situation. Psychoanal. Dial., 1:74–105.
28.
HoffmanI. (1992). Some practical implications of a social-constructivist view of the psychoanalytic situation. Psychoanal. Dial., 2:287–304.
29.
HoffmanI. (1994). Dialectical thinking and therapeutic action in the psychoanalytic process. Psychoanal. Q., 63:187–218.
30.
JacobsT. (1986). On countertransference enactments. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 34:289–307.
31.
JacobsT. (1991). The Use of the Self.Madison, CT: Int. Univ. Press.
32.
KrisA.O. (1984). The conflicts of ambivalence. Psychoanal. Study Child, 39:213–234.
33.
LearJ. (1993). An interpretation of transference. Int. J. Psychoanal., 74:739–755.
34.
LeavyS.A. (1980). The Psychoanalytic Dialogue.New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.
35.
LoewaldH.W. (1960). On the therapeutic action of psychoanalysis. In Papers on Psychoanalysis.New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1980, pp. 221–256.
36.
LoewaldH.W. (1970). Psychoanalytic theory and the psychoanalytic process. In Papers on Psychoanalysis.New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1980, pp. 277–301.
37.
LoewaldH.W. (1975). Psychoanalysis as an art and the fantasy character of the psychoanalytic situation. In Papers on Psychoanalysis.New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1980, pp. 352–371.
38.
LoewaldH.W. (1986). Transference-countertransference. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 34:275–287.
39.
McLaughlinJ. (1991). Clinical and theoretical aspects of enactment. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 39:596–614.
40.
PolandW.S. (1992). Transference: “an original creation.”Psychoanal. Q., 61:185–205.
41.
RangellL. (1983). Defense and resistance in psychoanalysis and Me. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 31:147–174 (supp.).
42.
RenikO. (1993). Analytic interaction: conceptualizing technique in light of the analyst's irreducible subjectivity. Psychoanal. Q., 62:553–571.
43.
RenikO. (1995). The role of an analyst's expectations in clinical technique: reflections on the concept of resistance. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 43:83–94.
44.
RoughtonR.E. (1993). Useful aspects of acting out: repetition, enactment and actualization. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 41:443–472.
45.
SandlerJ. (1976). Countertransference and role-responsiveness. Int. Rev. Psychoanal., 3:43–48.
46.
SchaferR. (1976). The idea of resistance. In A New Language for Psychoanalysis.New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.
47.
SummersF. (1994). Object Relations Theories and Psychopathology.Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
48.
WeinshelE.A. (1990). Further observations on the psychoanalytic process. Psychoanal. Q., 59:629–649.
49.
WhiteR.S. (1992). Transformations of transference. Psychoanal. Study Child, 47:329–348.
