The purpose of this paper is to clarify and enrich the concept of the primal scene. A critical review of the literature highlights the major questions and controversies that have arisen in relation to the concept. The authors propose that multiple and shifting identificatory positions can be discerned in primal scene configurations. Primal scene experiences and fantasies are viewed as a blueprint for internalized object relationships. Both traumatic and adaptive consequences of primal scene fantasies and exposure are noted. A case illustration exemplifies primal scene trauma resulting from chronic exposure and illustrates the analysand's internalized multiple and shifting identifications which became embedded in the transference relationship.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amati-MehlerJ. (1992). Love and male impotence. Int. J. Psychoanal., 73:467–480.
2.
ArlowJ. (1980). The revenge motive in the primal scene. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 28:519–541.
3.
BlumH. (1974). The borderline childhood of the Wolf Man. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 22:721–742.
4.
BlumH. (1979). On the concept and consequences of the primal scene. Psychoanal. Q., 48:27–47.
5.
BollasC. (1993). Forces of Destiny: Psychoanalysis and Human Destiny.New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
6.
DahlG. (1982). Notes on critical examinations of the primal scene concept. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 30:657–677.
7.
DevereauxG. (1951). The primal scene and juvenile heterosexuality in Mohave society. In Psychoanalysis and Culture, ed. WilberG.B.MuensterbergerW.. New York: Int. Univ. Press, pp. 90–107.
8.
EdelheitH. (1967). Discussion of A.J. Lubin: the influence of the Russian Orthodox Church on Freud's Wolf-Man. Psychoanal. Forum, 2:165–166.
9.
EdelheitH. (1969). The primal scene schema. Presentation to Kris Study Group. New York Psychoanalytic Institute.
10.
EdelheitH. (1971). Mythopoiesis and the primal scene. Psychoanal. Study of Society, 5:212–233.
11.
EdelheitH. (1974). Crucifixion fantasies and their relation to the primal scene. Int. J. Psychoanal., 40:193–199.
12.
EsmanA. (1973). The primal scene: a review and a reconsideration. Psychoanal. Study Child, 7:173–215.
13.
FreudA. (1967). Comments on psychic trauma. In Psychic Trauma, ed. FurstS.S.. New York: Basic Books, pp. 235–245.
14.
FreudS. (1892–1899). Extracts from the Fliess papers. S.E., 1.
15.
FreudS. (1900). The Interpretation of Dreams. S.E., 4 & 5.
16.
FreudS. (1905). Three essays on the theory of sexuality. S.E., 7.
17.
FreudS. (1909). Family romances. S.E., 9.
18.
FreudS. (1915). A case of paranoia running counter to the psycho-analytic theory of the disease. S.E., 14.
19.
FreudS. (1918). From the history of an infantile neurosis. S.E., 17.
20.
FreudS. (1919). ‘A child is being beaten’: a contribution to the study of the origin of sexual perversions. S.E., 17.
21.
FreudS. (1925). Some psychical consequences of the anatomical distinction between the sexes. S.E., 19.
22.
GreenA. (1986a). The dead mother. In On Private Madness.Madison, CT: Int. Univ. Press, pp. 142–173.
23.
GreenA. (1986b). Potential space in psychoanalysis. In On Private Madness.Madison, CT: Int. Univ. Press, pp. 277–296.
24.
GreenacreP. (1973). The primal scene and the sense of reality. Psychoanal. Q., 52:10–41.
25.
IkonenP.RechardtE. (1984). On the universal nature of the primal scene fantasies. Int. J. Psychoanal., 65:63–72.
26.
IsayR. (1975). The influence of the primal scene on the sexual behavior of an early adolescent. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 23:535–553.
27.
KernbergO. (1976). Object-Relations Theory and Clinical Psychoanalysis.New York: Aronson.
28.
KohutH. (1977). The Restoration of the Self.New York: Int. Univ. Press.
29.
LaplancheJ.PontalisJ.-B. (1964). Fantasme originaire, fantasmes des origines, origines du fantasme. Les Temps Modernes, 215:1833–1868.
30.
LewinB.D. (1932). Analysis and structure of a transient hypomania. Psychoanal. Q., 1:43–58.
31.
BrunswickR. Mack (1940). The preoedipal phase of the libido development. In The Psycho-Analytic Reader, ed. FleissR.. London: Hogarth Press, pp. 231–253.
McDougallJ. (1972). Primal scene and sexual perversion. Int. J. Psychoanal., 53:371–384.
34.
McDougallJ. (1985). Theaters of the Mind.New York: Basic Books.
35.
MeadM. (1928). Coming of Age in Samoa.New York: Morrow.
36.
MyersW. (1973). Split self-representation and the primal scene. Psychoanal. Q., 42:525–538.
37.
MyersW. (1979). Clinical consequences of chronic primal scene exposure. Psychoanal. Q., 48:1–26.
38.
OgdenT. (1992). The dialectically constituted/decentred subject of psychoanalysis, I. The Freudian subject. Int. J. Psychoanal., 73:517–526.
39.
Panel (1965). Memory and repression. W. Niederland, reporter. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 13:619–663.
40.
Panel (1978). The pathogenicity of the primal scene. R. Isay, reporter. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 26:131–142.
41.
Pederson-KragG. (1949). Detective stories and the primal scene. Psychoanal. Q., 8:207–214.
42.
SolnitA.KrisM. (1967). Trauma and infantile experiences: a longitudinal perspective. In Psychic Trauma, ed. FurstS.S.. New York: Basic Books, pp. 175–220.
