The Irma dream has special historical significance. Erikson and others have placed it in historical, social, and cultural context. The manifest dream was elaborated in terms of analytic surface with analysis of form and content, patterns and movement in time and space, etc. There are, however, limits to textual reinterpretations. Further psychobiographic consideration of the Irma dream highlights issues of transference, countertransference and their sources in unconscious conflict and trauma. The Irma dream was initially a secret dream which represented the initiation of a self-analytic and supervisory process. Freud's revealing the dream and imagining the commemoration of the discovery of “the secret of the dream” marked the termination of formal self-analysis within analysis interminable.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnzieuD. (1986). Freud's Self-Analysis.New York: International Universities Press.
BlumH. (1976). Dreams and free association. Int. J. Psychoanal., 57:315–324.
4.
BlumH. (1977). The prototype of preoedipal reconstruction. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 25:757–785.
5.
BlumH. (1981). The forbidden quest and the analytic ideal. Psychoanal. Q., 50:535–556.
6.
BlumH. (1990). Freud, Fliess, and the parenthood of psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Q., 59:21–39.
7.
BrabantE.FalzederP.Giampieri-DeutschHaynalA., Eds. (1992). The Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Sandor Ferenczi, Vol. 1, 1908–1914.Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press/Harvard Univ. Press.
8.
BregerL. (1980). The manifest dream and its latent meaning. In The Dream in Clinical Practice, ed. NattersonJ.. New York: Aronson, pp. 3–28.
9.
BreuerJ.FreudS. (1893–1895). Studies on Hysteria. S.E., 2.
10.
EisslerK. (1985). A farewell to Freud's interpretation of dreams. Amer. Imago, 42:111–129.
11.
ElmsA. (1980). Freud, Irma, Martha: sex and marriage in “the dream of Irma's injection.”Psychoanal. Rev., 67:83–109.
12.
EriksonE. (1954). The dream specimen of psychoanalysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 2:5–55.
13.
EriksonE. (1968). Identity, Youth, and Crisis.New York: Norton.
14.
FreudS. (1895). Project for a scientific psychology. S.E., 1.
15.
FreudS. (1899). Screen memories. S.E., 3.
16.
FreudS. (1900). The Interpretation of Dreams. S.E., 4 & 5.
17.
FreudS. (1901). The psychopathology of everyday life. S.E., 6.
18.
FreudS. (1908). Letter to K. Abraham. In A Psycho-Analytic Dialogue: The Letters of Sigmund Freud and Karl Abraham, 1907–1926, ed. AbrahamH.FreudE.. New York: Basic Books, 1965.
19.
FreudS. (1914). On the history of the psycho-analytic movement. S.E., 14.
20.
GoldnerR. (1993). Little secrets revealed in the specimen dream. Unpublished.
HartmanF. (1983). A reappraisal of the Emma episode and the specimen dream. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 31:555–585.
23.
JonesE. (1953). Sigmund Freud: Life and Work.Vol. 1. New York: Basic Books.
24.
KanzerM. (1983). Freud's “Specimen Dream” in a widening context. In The Future of Psychoanalysis, ed. GoldbergA.. New York: Int. Univ. Press, pp. 241–254.
25.
KohutH. (1978). Creativeness, charisma, group psychology: reflections on the self-analysis of Freud. In The Search for the Self, ed. OrnsteinP.. New York: Int. Univ. Press, pp. 793–843.
26.
MassonJ., Ed. (1985). The Complete Utters of Sigmund Freud to Wilhelm Fliess, 1887–1904.Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
27.
MautnerB. (1991). Freud's Irma dream: a psychoanalytic interpretation. Int. J. Psychoanal., 72:275–286.
28.
PulverS. (1987). The manifest dream in psychoanalysis: a clarification. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 35:99–118.
29.
RudnytskyP. (1987). Freud and Oedipus.New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
30.
SchurM. (1972). Freud Living and Dying.New York: Int. Univ. Press.
31.
SpanjaardM. (1969). The manifest content and its significance for the interpretation of dreams. Int. J. Psychoanal., 50:221–235.
32.
WhitmanR.KramerM.BaldridgeB. (1969). Dreams about the patient: an approach to the problem of countertransference. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 17:702–727.
