This paper describes a training analysis which required a reanalysis. An evaluation of the circumstances leading to the need for further psychoanalysis for the practicing analyst is detailed. A discussion of the value and necessity for self-analysis following analysis is presented. The description of a specific technique for conducting a self-analysis is rendered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArlowJ. (1969). Myth and ritual in psychoanalytic training. In Training Analysis: Report of the First Three-Institute Conference on Psychoanalytic Education, ed. BabcockC.. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh Psychoanalytic Institute, pp. 104–120.
2.
ArlowJ. (1979). The genesis of interpretation. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn. (suppl. 27):193–206.
3.
BibringG.L. (1954). The training analysis and its place in psychoanalytic training. Int. J. Psychoanal., 35:169–173.
4.
BlumH.P. (1981). Some current and recurrent problems of psychoanalytic technique. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 29:47–68.
5.
CalderK. (1980). An analyst's self-analysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 28:5–20.
6.
CalefV.WeinshelE.M. (1973). Reporting, non-reporting and assessment in the training analysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 21:169–173.
7.
DewaldP. (1982). Elements of change and cure in psychoanalysis. Arch. Gen. Psychiat., 40:89–95.
GreenacreP. (1966). Problems of training analysis. In Emotional Growth, Volume 2. New York: Int. Univ. Press, 1971, pp. 718–742.
14.
GuntripH. (1975). My experience of analysis with Fairbairn and Winnicott. Int. Rev. Psychoanal., 2:145–156.
15.
HurwitzM.R. (1986). The analyst, his theory, and the psychoanalytic process. Psychoanal. Study Child, 41:439–466.
16.
JacobsT. (1986). On countertransference enactments. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 34:289–307.
17.
JacobsT. (1991). The Use of the Self.Madison, CT: Int. Univ. Press.
18.
KairysD. (1964). The training analysis: a critical review of the literature and a controversial proposal. Psychoanal. Q., 33:448–512.
19.
KeiserS. (1969). Report of Chairman of Committee on Institutes to the Board of Professional Standards, American Psychoanalytic Association, April 30.
20.
KleinH.S. (1974). Summary of conference reports. Final report. 5th Pre-Congress Conference on Training, Paris, 1973, pp. 10–14.
21.
KramerM. (1959). On the continuation of the analytic process after psychoanalysis (a self observation). Int. J. Psychoanal., 40:17–25.
22.
Lampl-de GrootJ. (1954). Problems of psychoanalytic training. Int. J. Psychoanal., 35:184–187.
23.
LeavyS.A. (1980). The Psychoanalytic Dialogue.New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
24.
LifschutzJ.E. (1976). A critique of reporting and assessment in the training analysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 24:43–59.
25.
LimentaniA. (1974). The training analyst and the difficulties in the training psychoanalytic situation. Int. J. Psychoanal., 55:71–78.
26.
LoewaldH.W. (1960). On the therapeutic action of psychoanalysis. Int. J. Psychoanal., 41:16–33.
27.
LoewaldH.W. (1971). The transference neurosis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 19:54–66.
28.
MarcovitzE. (1973). On confidentiality in psychoanalysis. Bull. Phila. Assn. Psychoanal., 23:1–7.
29.
McDougallJ. (1974). Summary of conference reporters. Final report of the 5th Pre-Congress Conference on Training, Paris, 1973, pp. 10–14.
30.
McLaughlinF. (1967). Addendum to a controversial proposal: some observations on the training analysis. Psychoanal. Q., 36:230–247.
31.
McLaughlinJ.T. (1973). The non-reporting training analyst, the analysis, and the institute. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 21:697–712.
32.
McLaughlinJ.T. (1981). Transference, psychic reality and countertransference. Psychoanal. Q., 50:639–684.
33.
McLaughlinJ.T. (1988). The analyst's insights. Psychoanal. Q., 57:370–388.
34.
NormanH.BarrettW.BlackerK.OremlandJ.D. (1974). The fate of the transference after analysis. Workshop on “The fate of the transference after analysis.” A. Balkoura, reporter. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 22:895–903.
35.
Panel (1969). Problems of termination in the analysis of adults. S. Firestein, reporter. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 17:222–237.
36.
Panel (1972). Levels of confidentiality in the psychoanalytic situation. A. Watson, reporter. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 20:156–176.
37.
PfefferA. (1959). A procedure for the evaluation of the results of psychoanalysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 7:222–237.
38.
PfefferA. (1961). Follow-up study of a successful analysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 9:698–718.
39.
PfefferA. (1963). The meaning of the analyst after analysis: a contribution to theory of therapeutic results. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 11:229–244.
40.
PfefferA. (1974). The difficulties of the training analyst in the training analysis. Int. J. Psychoanal., 55:79–83.
41.
PolandW. (1986). The analyst's words. Psychoanal. Q., 55:244–271.
42.
PolandW. (1988). Insight and the analytic dyad. Psychoanal. Q., 57:341–369.
43.
RackerH. (1957). The meaning and uses of countertransference. Psychoanal. Q., 26:303–357.
44.
ShapiroD. (1976). The analyst's own analysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 24:5–42.
45.
StoneL. (1981). Notes on the non-interpretive elements in the psychoanalytic situation and process. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 29:89–118.
