The opening phase of analysis has received scant attention. Freud initially included, as essential, the establishment of an analytic process via the method of free association in the opening phase. However, his stance in relation to this process we can now characterize as authoritarian, and as influenced by suggestion and manipulation. Recent literature, while contributing to the understanding of the range of dynamics possible when beginning an analysis, continues to ignore the manner in which the method of free association may be used by both participants in establishing an analytic frame. Two clinical examples of how this latter process may be inaugurated are given, and reasons for the drift away from it are suggested.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abend, S. (1990). The influence of the patient's previous knowledge on the opening phase. In On Beginning an Analysis, ed. T. Jacobs & A. Rothstein. Madison, CT: Int. Univ. Press, pp. 57–66.
2.
Apfelbaum, B. & Gill, M. (1989). Ego analysis and the relativity of defense: technical implications of the structural theory. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 37:1071–1096.
3.
Brenner, C. (1990). On beginning an analysis. In On Beginning an Analysis, ed. T. Jacobs & A. Rothstein. Madison, CT: Int. Univ. Press, pp. 47–56.
4.
Busch, F. (1992). Recurring thoughts on the unconscious ego resistances. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 40:1089–1115.
5.
Busch, F. (1993). In the neighborhood: aspects of a good interpretation and its relationship to a “developmental lag” in ego psychology. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 41:151–178.
6.
Busch, F. (1994). Some ambiguities in the method of free association and their implications for technique. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 42:363–384.
7.
Busch, F. (1995a). Do actions speak louder than words? A query into an enigma in analytic theory and technique. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 43:61–82.
8.
Busch, F. (1995b). An unknown classic: M.N. Searl's 1936 “Some queries on princi ples of technique.”Psychoanal. Q, 64:326–344.
9.
Freud, S. (1900). The interpretation of dreams. S.E., 4/5.
10.
Freud, S. (1913). On beginning the treatment. S.E., 12:123–144.
11.
Glover, E. (1955). The Technique of Psychoanalysis.New York: Int. Univ. Press.
12.
Gray, P. (1973). Psychoanalytic technique and the ego's capacity for viewing intrapsychic conflict. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 21:474–494.
13.
Gray, P. (1982). “Developmental lag” in the evolution of technique for psycho analysis of neurotic conflict. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 30:621–655.
14.
Gray, P. (1986). On helping analysands observe intrapsychic activity. In Psychoanal ysis, the Science of Mental Conflict: Essays in Honor of Charles Brenner, ed. A.D. Richards & M.S. Willick. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, pp. 245–262.
15.
Gray, P. (1992). Memory as resistance and the telling of a dream. J. Amer. Psy choanal. Assn., 40:307–326.
16.
Jacobs, T. (1990a). Introduction. In On Beginning an Analysis, ed. T. Jacobs & A. Rothstein. Madison, CT: Int. Univ. Press, pp. xiii–xviii.
17.
Jacobs, T. (1990b). On beginning an analysis with a young adult. In On Beginning an Analysis, ed. T. Jacobs & A. Rothstein. Madison, CT: Int. Univ. Press, pp. 83–100.
18.
Jacobs, T. & Rothstein, A. (1990). On Beginning an Analysis. Madison, CT: Int. Univ. Press.
19.
Kris, A. (1982). Free Association: Method and Process. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
20.
Kris, A. (1983). The analyst's conceptual freedom in the method of free association. Int. J. Psychoanal, 64:407–411.
21.
Kris, A. (1990). The analyst's stance and the method of free association. Psy choanal Study Child, 45:25–41.
22.
Kris, A. (1992). Interpretation and the method of free association. Psychoanal. Inq., 12:208–224.
23.
Kris, E. (1956). The personal myth. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 4:653–681.
24.
Sandler, A. (1975). Comments on the significance of Piaget's work for psychoanalysis. Int. Rev. Psychoanal, 2:365–377.
25.
Schlessinger, N. & Robbins, F. (1983). A Developmental View of the Psychoanalytic Process: Follow-up Studies and Their Consequences.New York: Int. Univ. Press.
26.
Searl, N. (1936). Some queries on principles of technique. Int. J. Psychoanal, 17:471–493.
27.
Stone, L. (1954). The widening scope of indications for psychoanalysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 2:567–594.
28.
Stone, L (1961). The Psychoanalytic Situation.New York: Int. Univ. Press.
29.
Weinshel, E. (1984). Some observations on the psychoanalytic process. Psychoana Q., 53:63–92.
