Focused association is a technique for exploring repetitive noncom-municative phenomena, especially those which occupy center stage during periods of analytic stalemate. This psychological content is studied by a two-part investigation of the particulars of the presenting “surface,” involving (I) focusing and (2) association. The technique was originally devised by Freud to access the latent meanings of dreams. The effort departs from free association, calling upon more active analytic teamwork within a transference-countertrans-ference context that is steadily considered and analyzed. The key “unverbal” material arising from this dyadic flux is descriptively pre-conscious, multimodal, widely variable in form, and not primarily lexical. A frequent finding is that these repeating ad hoc clinical phenomena, often categorized as resistance (especially transference resistance), are highly condensed and defensively rearranged compositions, like dreams, that have been internally structured by processes akin to dreamwork. Approached by focused association, such content yields unconscious derivatives that previously had been sequestered in repetitious, noncommunicative forms. This work allows the analyst to follow Freud's clinical maxim to “start with the surface” and provides relief for the analyst from the temptation to invoke global resistance interpretations when derivative communication and analytic movement have lapsed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Boesky, D. (1982). Acting out: a reconsideration of the concept. Int. J. Psychoanal., 63:39–56.
2.
Boesky, D. (1983). Resistance and character theory: a reconsideration of the concept of character resistance. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 31(Suppl.):227–246.
3.
Boesky, D. (1990). The psychoanalytic process and its components. Psychoanal. Q, 59:550–584.
4.
Boorstin, D. (1958). The Americans: The Colonial Experience.New York: Random House, pp. 149–152.
5.
Brenner, C. (1982). The Mind in Conflict.New York: Int. Univ. Press.
6.
Busch, F. (1992). Recurring thoughts on unconscious ego resistances. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 40:1059–1088.
7.
Busch, F. (1993). In the neighborhood: aspects of a good interpretation and a developmental lag in ego psychology. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 41:157–178.
8.
Calder, K. (1980). An analyst's self-analysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 28:5–20.
9.
Clyman, R. (1991). The procedural organization of emotions: a contribution from cognitive science to the psychoanalytic theory of therapeutic action. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 39(Suppl.):349–382.
10.
Freud, A. (1936). The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defense.New York: Int. Univ. Press.
11.
Freud, S. (1900). The interpretation of dreams. S.E., 4/5.
12.
Freud, S. (1913). Totem and taboo. S.E., 13:159–160.
13.
Freud, S. (1940). An outline of psychoanalysis. S.E., 23:144–207.
14.
Gray, P. (1973). Psychoanalytic technique and the ego's capacity for viewing intrapsychic activity. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 21:474–494.
15.
Gray, P. (1982). “Developmental lag” in the evolution of technique for psycho-analysis of neurotic conflict. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 30:621–655.
16.
Green, A. (1974). Surface analysis, deep analysis (the role of the preconscious in psychoanalytic technique). Int. Rev. Psychoanal, 1:415–423.
17.
Greenson, R. (1965). The working alliance and the transference neurosis. Psychoanal. Q, 34:155–181.
18.
Greenson, R. (1967). The Technique and Practice of Psychoanalysis. Vol. 1. New York: Int. Univ. Press.
19.
Jacobs, T. (1973). Posture, gesture and movements in the analyst: cues to interpretation and countertransference. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 21:77–92.
20.
Kantrowitz, J. (1993). Impasses in psychoanalysis: overcoming resistance in situations of stalemate. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 41:1021–1050.
21.
Kern, J. (1978). Countertransference and spontaneous screens: an analyst studies his own visual images. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 26:21–48.
22.
Kern, J. (1987a). Daytime dreamwork and the analyzing enterprise: a report from the field. Presented to the Michigan Psychoanalytic Society, May 1987.
23.
Kern, J. (1987b). Transference neurosis as a waking dream: notes on a clinical enigma. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 35:337–366.
24.
Kern, J. (1988). Material witnesses: the analyst, the patient and the multimodal consequences of the fundamental rule. Presented to the Michigan Psychoanalytic Society, November 1988.
25.
Kernberg, O. (1975). Borderline Conditions and Pathological Narcissism.New York: Aronson.
26.
Kohut, H. (1971). The Analysts of the Self.New York: Int. Univ. Press.
27.
Kohut, H. (1977). The Restoration of the Self.New York: Int. Univ. Press.
28.
Levy, S. & Inderbitzen, L. (1990). The analytic surface and the theory of technique. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 38:371–392.
29.
McLaughlin, J. (1987). The play of transference: some reflections of enactment in the psychoanalytic situation. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 35:557–583.
30.
McLaughlin, J. (1988). The analyst's insights. Psychoanal. Q, 62:370–389.
31.
Panel (1992). Enactments in psychoanalysis. Reported by M. Johan. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 40:827–841.
32.
Panel (1993). The analytic surface. Reported by B. Seelig. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 41:171–190.
33.
Paniagua, C. (1991). Patient's surface, clinical surface, and workable surface. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 39:669–686.
34.
Poland, W. (1988). Insights and the analytic dyad. Psychoanal. Q, 62:341–369.
35.
Poland, W. (1992). From analytic surface to analytic space. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 41:339–358.
36.
Rangell, L. (1983). Defense and resistance in psychoanalysis and life. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 31(Suppl.):147–174.
37.
Renik, O. (1993). Analytic interaction: conceptualizing technique in light of the analyst's irreducible subjectivity. Psychoanal. Q, 62:553–571.
38.
Sandler, J. (1976). Psychoanalysis and role responsiveness. Int. Rev. Psychoanal, 3:43–47.
39.
Sandler, J. & Freud, A. (1985). The Analysis of Defense.New York: Int. Univ. Press.
40.
Schwaber, E. (1979). On the self within the matrix of analytic theory. Int. J. Psychoanal, 60:467–480.
41.
Schwaber, E. (1986). Reconstruction and perceptual experience: further thoughts on psychoanalytic listening. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 34:911–932.
42.
Schwaber, E. (1992). Psychoanalytic theory and its relation to clinical work. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 40:1039–1058.
43.
Shapiro, T. (1991). Words and feelings in the psychoanalytic dialogue. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 39:321–348.
44.
Sonnenberg, S. (1991). The analyst's self-analysis and its impact on clinical work: a comment on the sources and importance of personal insights. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 39:687–704.
45.
Spencer, J. & Balter, L. (1990). Psychoanalytic observation. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 38:393–422.
46.
Sterba, R. (1934). The fate of the ego in analytic therapy. Int. J. Psychoanal, 15:117–126.
47.
Stone, L. (1954). The widening scope of indications for psychoanalysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 2:567–594.
48.
Stone, L. (1961). The Psychoanalytic Situation.New York: Int. Univ. Press.
49.
Waelder, R. (1962). Psychoanalysis, scientific method, and philosophy. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 10:617–637.
50.
Wallerstein, R. (1983). Defenses, defense mechanisms, and the structure of the mind. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 31:201–225.
51.
Zetzel, E. (1956). Current concepts of transference. Int. J. Psychoanal, 37:369–376.
