Although Freud encoded the idea of “working through” as a mere metaphor, it served the essential role of designating the necessary activities of analyst and analysand that go beyond the elucidation of mental contents through interpretation. From a neurobiological viewpoint, these processes involve the establishment of new neural networks through gradual habituation. From the vantage point of cognition, this necessarily slow process amounts to learning new skills in communication, the mastery of mounting unpleasure, and the expansion of “referential activity.” These considerations imply that the crux of analytic work is changing those biological functions we call thought processes, thereby improving the person's ability to regulate behavior adaptively. Thus, the interpretation of mental content is a byproduct of the analytic work–a result of clearer thinking, facilitated by identifying areas of primitive mentation and assisting analysands to expand their repertory of psychological skills. Only these intrapsychic changes in functional capacity will enable patients to reach the insight necessary for continuous adaptation through self-inquiry.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Brenner, C. (1987). Working through: 1914-1984. Psychoanal. Q, 56:88–108.
2.
Bucci, W. (1993). The development of emotional meaning in free association: a multiple code theory. In Hierarchical Concepts in Psychoanalysis, ed. A. Wilson & J. Gedo. New York: Guilford, pp. 3–47.
3.
Brodsky, B. (1967). Working through: widening scope–aspects of its metapsychology. Psychoanal. Q, 36:485–496.
4.
Ehrenberg, D. (1992). The Intimate Edge.New York: Norton.
5.
Eissler, K.R. (1953). The effect of the structure of the ego on psychoanalytic technique. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 1:104–143.
6.
Ekstein, R. (1965). Working through and termination of analysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 13:57–78.
7.
Ferenczi, S.; Abraham, K.; Simmel, E.; & Jones, E. (1919). Psychoanalysis and the War Neuroses.London: International Psycho-Analytical Press, 1921.
8.
Freud, S. (1892-1899). Extracts from the Fliess papers. S.E., 1:177–280.
9.
Freud, S. (1895a). A reply to criticisms of my paper on anxiety neurosis. S.E., 3:121–140.
10.
Freud, S. (1895b). On the grounds for detaching a particular syndrome from neurasthenia under the description “anxiety neurosis.”S.E., 3:87–115.
11.
Freud, S. (1900). The interpretation of dreams. S.E., 4/5.
12.
Freud, S. (1909). Notes upon a case of obsessional neurosis. S.E., 10:153–250.
13.
Freud, S. (1911). Formulations on the two principles of mental functioning. S.E., 12:218–226.
14.
Freud, S. (1914). Remembering, repeating and working-through. S.E., 12:146–156.
15.
Freud, S. (1915). The unconscious. S.E., 14:166–204.
16.
Freud, S. (1916). Some character types met with in psychoanalytic work. S.E., 14:311–333.
17.
Freud, S. (1920). Beyond the pleasure principle. S.E., 18:3–64.
18.
Freud, S. (1924). The economic problem of masochism. S.E., 19:157–170.
19.
Freud, S. (1926). Inhibitions, symptoms and anxiety. S.E., 20:87–172.
20.
Freud, S. (1937). Analysis terminable and interminable. S.E., 23:216–253.
21.
Galatzer-Levy, R. (1988). On working through: a model from artificial intelligence. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 36:125–152.
22.
Gardner, R. (1983). Self Inquiry.Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, 1989.
23.
Gedo, J. (1964). Concepts for a classification of the psychotherapies. Int. J. Psychoanal, 45:530–539.
24.
Gedo, J. (1966). The psychotherapy of developmental arrest. Brit. J. Med. Psychol., 39:25–33.
25.
Gedo, J. (1967). On critical periods for corrective experience in the therapy of arrested development. Brit. J. Med. Psychol, 40:79–83.
Gedo, J. (1981). Advances in Clinical Psychoanalysis.New York: Int. Univ. Press.
28.
Gedo, J. (1988). The Mind in Disorder.Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
29.
Gedo, J. (1991). The Biology of Clinical Encounters.Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
30.
Gedo, J. (1993). On fastball pitching, astronomical clocks, and self-cognition. In Self-Analysis, ed. J. Barron. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, pp. 133–146.
31.
Gedo, J. (1994). Analydc interventions: the question of form. In The Spectrum of Psychoanalysis, ed. A.K. Richards & A.D. Richards. Madison, CT: Int. Univ. Press, pp. 109–125.
32.
Gedo, J. (in press). The primitive psyche, communication, and the language of the body. Psychoanal. Inq.
33.
Gedo, J. & Goldberg, A. (1973). Models of the Mind.Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press.
34.
Gray, P. (1973). Psychoanalytic technique and the ego's capacity for viewing intrapsychic activity. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 21:474–494.
35.
Hartmann, H. (1939). Ego Psychology and the Problem of Adaptation.New York: Int. Univ. Press, 1958.
36.
Hartmann, H. (1948). Comments on the psychoanalytic dieory of instinctual drives. In Essays on Ego Psychology.New York: Int. Univ. Press, 1964, pp. 69–89.
37.
Krystal, H. (1968). Massive Psychic Trauma.New York: Int. Univ. Press.
38.
Krystal, H. (1975). Affect tolerance. Annual Psychoanal, 2:179–219.
39.
Levin, F. (1991). Mapping the Mind.Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
40.
Levin, F. & Vuckovich, D. (1987). Brain plasticity, learning, and psychoanalysis. Annual Psychoanal, 15:49–96.
41.
O'Shaughnessy, E. (1983). Words and working through. Int. J. Psychoanal, 64:281–290.
42.
Rapaport, D. (1940). Emotions and Memory.2nd ed.New York: Int. Univ. Press, 1950.
43.
Sedler, M. (1983). Freud's concept of working through. Psychoanal. Q, 52:73–98.
44.
Shane, M. (1979). A developmental approach to “working through” in the psychoanalytic process. Int. J. Psychoanal, 60:375–382.
45.
Stewart, W. (1963). An inquiry into the concept of working through. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 11:474–499.
46.
Valenstein, A. (1973). On attachment to painful feelings and the negative therapeutic reaction. Psychoanal. Study Child, 28:365–392.
47.
Valenstein, A. (1983). Working through the resistance to change: insight and action. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 31:353–374.
48.
Weiss, E. (1970). Sigmund Freud as a Consultant.New York: Intercontinental Medical Book Corp.
49.
Wilson, A & Weinstein, L. (1992). An investigation into some implications for psychoanalysis of the Vigotskian view on the origins of mind. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 40:357–387.
