Freud's 1900 theory of transference was indebted to the convergence of philosophy and physiology found in nineteenth-century theories of visual perception. The author maps out the post-Kantian philosophical and German physiological currents that gave rise to Hermann von Helmholtz's influential work on perception, and proposes that Freud's 1900 theory of transference was a creative synthesis of novel notions like unconscious wishing and psychic defense with a Helmholtzian model of visual illusion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aarsleff, H. (1982). Locke's reputation in nineteenth-century England. In From Locke to Saussure: Essays on the Study of Language and Intellectual History. Minneapolis, MN: Univ. Minnesota Press, pp. 120–145.
2.
Amacher, P. (1965). Freud's Neurological Education and Its Influence on Psychoanalytic Theory. Psychol. Issues, Monogr. 16. New York: Int. Univ. Press.
3.
Amacher, P. (1974). The concepts of the pleasure principle and infantile erogenous zones shaped by Freud's neurological education. Psychoanal. Q., 43:218–223.
4.
Bernfeld, S. (1944). Freud's earliest theories and the school of Helmholtz. Psychoanal. Q., 13:341–362.
5.
Bernfeld, S. (1949). Freud's scientific beginnings. Amer. Imago, 6:163–196.
6.
Boring, E. (1942). Sensation and Perception in the History of Experimental Psychology. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.
7.
Boring, E. (1950). A History of Experimental Psychology. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.
8.
Breuer, J. & Freud, S. (1895). Studies on hysteria. S. E., 2.
9.
Chertok, L. (1968). The discovery of transference. Int. J. Psychoanal., 19:415–132.
10.
Chertok, L. & Saussure, R. De (1979). The Therapeutic Revolution: From Mesmer to Freud. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
11.
Cranefield, P. (1966a). Freud and the “school of Helmholtz”. Gesnerus, 23:35–39.
12.
Cranefield, P. (1966b). The philosophical and cultural interests of the biophysics movement of 1847. J. Hist. Med., 21:1–7.
13.
Cranefield, P. (1970). Some problems in writing the history of psychoanalysis. In Psychiatry and Its History, ed. G. Mora & J. Brand. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas, pp. 41–55.
14.
Crary, J. (1990). Techniques of the Observer. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
Culotta, C. A. (1974). German biophysics, objective knowledge, and romanticism. In Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, Vol. 4, ed. R. McCormmach. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press, pp. 3–33.
16.
Eixenberger, H. (1970). The Discovery of the Unconscious. New York: Basic Books.
17.
Fichte, J. G. (1802). The Science of Knowledge, ed. & trans. P. Heath & J. Lachs. Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1982.
18.
Freud, S. (1888). Gehirn. In A Moment of Transition: Two Neuroscientific Articles by Sigmund Freud, trans. & ed. M. Solms & M. Saling. London: Karnac, 1990, pp. 39–86.
19.
Freud, S. (1894). The neuro-psychoses of defence. S. E., 3.
20.
Freud, S. (1895). Project for a scientific psychology. S. E., 1.
21.
Freud, S. (1898). The psychical mechanism of forgetfulness. S. E., 3.
22.
Freud, S. (1899). Screen memories. S. E., 3.
23.
Freud, S. (1900). The interpretation of dreams. S. E., 4 & 5.
24.
Freud, S. (1915). The unconscious. S. E., 14.
25.
Freud, S. (1933). New introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. S. E., 22.
26.
Freud, S. (1940a). An outline of psycho-analysis. S. E., 23.
27.
Freud, S. (1940b). Some elementary lessons in psycho-analysis. S. E., 23.
28.
Gilman, S. L. (1991). The Jew's Body. New York: Routledge.
29.
Hatfield, G. (1990). The Natural and the Normative. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30.
Heimann, P. M. (1974). Helmholtz and Kant: the metaphysical foundation of Über die Erhaltung der Kraft. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci., 5:205–238.
31.
Helmholtz, H. Von (1855). Uber das Sehen des Menschen. In Vorträge und Reden. Braunschweig, Germany: Verlag von Friedrich Vieweg, 1903.
32.
Helmholtz, H. Von (1866/1910). Helmholtz's Treatise on Physiological Optics, Vol. 3, ed. & trans. J. P. C. Southall. Rochester, NY: Optical Society of America, 1925.
33.
Helmholtz, H. Von (1868). The recent progress in the theory of vision. In Selected Writings of Hermann von Helmholtz, ed. R. Kahl. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan Univ. Press, 1971, pp. 144–222.
34.
Helmholtz, H. Von (1869). The aim and progress of physical science. In Selected Writings of Hermann von Helmholtz, ed. R. Kahl. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan Univ. Press, 1971, pp. 223–245.
35.
Helmholtz, H. Von (1878). The facts of perception. In Selected Writings of Hermann von Helmholtz, ed. R. Kahl. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan Univ. Press, 1971, pp. 366–408.
36.
Helmholtz, H. Von (1891). Autobiographical sketch. In Popular Lectures on Scientific Subjects, Vol. 2. New York: Longmans, Green, 1903, pp. 266–291.
37.
Helmholtz, H. Von (1894). The origin and correct interpretation of our sense impressions. In Selected Writings of Hermann von Helmholtz, ed. R. Kahl. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan Univ. Press, 1971, p. 505.
38.
Herzog, P. (1988). The myth of Freud as antiphilosopher. In Freud Appraisals and Reappraisals, Vol. 2, ed. P. Stepansky. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, pp. 163–190.
39.
Holt, R. R. (1989). Freud Reappraised. New York: Guilford Press.
40.
Hunsdahl, J. (1967). Concerning Einfühlung (empathy): a concept analysis of its origin and early development. J. Hist. Behav. Sci., 3:180–191.
41.
Jerusalem, W. (1899). Introduction to Philosophy. New York: Macmillan, 1917.
42.
Jerusalem, W. (1905). Theodor Meynert's populäre Vorträge. In Gedanken und Denker: Gesammelte Aufsätze. Vienna: W. Braumüller.
43.
Jones, E. (1953). The Life and Work of Sigmund Freud, Vols. 1–3. New York: Basic Books.
44.
Kant, I. (1781). Critique of Pure Reason. New York: St. Martins Press, 1965.
45.
Kantor, J. R. (1969). The Scientific Evolution of Psychology, Vol. 2. Chicago: Principia Press.
46.
Kanzer, M. (1981). Freud, Theodor Lipps and “Scientific Psychology”. Psychoanal. Q., 50:393–410.
47.
Kravis, N. (1992). The prehistory of the idea of transference. Int. Rev. Psychoanal., 19:9–22.
48.
Lauxtermann, P. F. H. (1987). Five decisive years: Schopenhauer's epistemology as reflected in his theory of colour. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci., 18:271–291.
49.
Leary, D. (1978). The philosophical development of the conception of psychology in Germany, 1780-1850. J. Hist. Behav. Sci., 14:113–121.
50.
Lenzen, V. (1947). Helmholtz's theory of knowledge. In Studies in the History of Science and Learning Offered in Homage to George Sarton, ed. M. F. A. Montagu. New York: H. Schuman, pp. 301–319.
51.
Lipps, T. (1883). Grundtalsachen des Seelenlebens. Bonn: Cohen.
52.
Lipps, T. (1903). Empathy, inner imitation, and sense feelings. In A Modern Book of Esthetics: An Anthology, ed. M. M. Rader. New York: Holt, 1935, pp. 291–304.
53.
Lipps, T. (1905). Psychological Studies. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 1926.
54.
Locke, J. (1690). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. New York: Dover, 1959.
55.
Makari, G. J. (1991). German philosophy, Freud, and the riddle of the woman. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 39:183–213.
56.
Makari, G. J. (1992). A history of Freud's first concept of transference. Int. Rev. Psychoanal., 19:415–132.
57.
Mandelbaum, M. (1964). Philosophy, Science and Seme Perception. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
Masson, J. M., Ed. (1985). The Complete Letters of Sigmund Freud to Wilhelm Fliess, 1887–1904. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
60.
McGrath, W. (1986). Freud's Discovery of Psychoanalysis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press, pp. 94–151.
61.
Meynert, T. (1884). Psychiatry. New York: Putnam's Sons, 1885.
62.
Muller, J. (1833). Elements of Physiology, trans. W. Baly. London: Taylor & Walton, 1838.
63.
Neuhouser, F. (1990). Fichte's Theory of Subjectivity. Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge Univ. Press.
64.
Pastore, N. (1974). Reevaluation of Boring on Kantian influence, nineteenth-century nativism, gestalt psychology and Helmholtz. J. Hist. Behav. Sci, 10:375–390.
65.
Pastore, N. (1978). Helmholtz on the projection or transfer of sensation. In Studies in Perception, ed. P. Machamer & R. Turnbull. Columbus, OH: Ohio Univ. Press, pp. 355–376.
66.
Richards, R. (1980). Wundt's early theories of unconscious inference and cognitive evolution in their relation to Darwinian biopsychology. In Wundt Studies, ed. W. Bringmann & R. Tweeny. Toronto: Hogrefe, pp. 42–70.
67.
Riese, W. & Arrington, G. (1963). The history of Johannes Müller's doctrine of specific energies of the senses: original and later versions. Bull. Hist. Med., 37:179–183.
68.
Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
69.
Rubenstein, B. (1965). Psychoanalytic theory and the mind-body problem. In Psychoanalysis and Current Biological Thought, ed. N. Greenfield & W. Lewis. Madison, WI: Univ. Wisconsin Press, pp. 35–56.
70.
Schopenhauer, A. (1815). Textes sur la Vue et sur les Couleurs. Paris: J. Vrin, 1986.
71.
Schopenhauer, A. (1819). The World as Will and Representation, Vol. 1. New York: Dover, 1969.
72.
Schopenhauer, A. (1844). The World as Will and Representation, Vol. 2. New York: Dover, 1969.
73.
Schopenhauer, A. (1978). Gesammelte Briefe. Bonn: Verlag H. Grundmann.
74.
Silverstein, B., (1985). Freud's psychology and its organic foundation: sexuality and mind-body interactionism. Psychoanal. Rev., 72:203–228.
75.
Solms, M. & Saling, M. (1990). Significance of Gehirn for psychoanalysis. In A Moment in Transition: Two Neuroscientific Articles by Sigmund Freud. London: Karnac.
76.
Sulloway, F. (1979). Freud, Biologist of the Mind. New York: Basic Books.
77.
Taine, H. (1870). On Intelligence. New York: Holt & Williams, 1872.
78.
Turner, R. S. (1977). Hermann von Helmholtz and the empiricist vision. J. Hist. Behav. Sci., 13:48–58.
79.
Turner, R. S. (1982). Helmholtz, sensory physiology, and the disciplinary development of German psychology. In The Problematic Science, ed. W. Woodward & M. Ash. New York: Praeger, pp. 147–166.
80.
Vogt, P. (1993). Seascape in the fog: metaphor in Locke's essay. J. Hist. Ideas, 54:1–18.
81.
Wallace, E. (1992). Freud and the mind-body problem. In Freud and the History of Psychoanalysis, ed. T. Gelfand & J. Kerr. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, pp. 231–269.
