Impasses in Psychoanalysis: Overcoming Resistance in Situations of Stalemate

Abstract

Many impasses occur in treatment when the patient fears that analysis will repeat frightening or disappointing experiences. These stalemates result from the patient's conviction that the analyst has confirmed a preexisting belief that is central to the patient's primary conflict. Frequently, this belief involves an unacceptable or frightening self- or object representation. At these times, intense resistance and strong negative transference/countertransference reactions may develop. Impasses are differentiated from these strong negative reactions only by virtue of the fact that they remain unanalyzed. The factors that create these negative states can best be understood in instances where the potential impasse is resolved. When impasses persist, most often patients leave treatment. Under these circumstances, we can try retrospectively to understand what has gone wrong, but without the patient's confirmation, our conclusions must remain speculative. Four cases illustrate varying degrees of analysis and resolution of resistance and transferencel countertransference binds.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Blum, H. P. (1986). Countertransference and the theory of technique. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 34:309–328.

Cooper, A. & Wittenberg, E. G. (1985). The “bogged-down” treatment: a remedy. Contemp. Psychoanal., 21:27–41.

Heimann, P. (1950). On countertransference. Int. J. Psychoanal., 31:81–84.

Jacobs, T. (1983). The analyst and the patient's object world: notes on an aspect of countertransference. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 31:619–642.

Jacobs, T. (1986). On countertransference enactments. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 34:289–308.

Kantrowitz, J. (1986). The role of the patient-analyst “match” in the outcome of psychoanalysis. Annual Psychoanal., 14:273–297.

Kantrowitz, J. (1992). The analyst's style and its impact on the psychoanalytic process: overcoming a patient-analyst stalemate. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 40:169–194.

Kantrowitz, J. Katz, A. L. ; Paolitto, F. ; Sashin, J. ; Solomon, L. ; Greenman, D. & Morris, H. (1989). Research in progress: the patient-analyst match and the outcome of psychoanalysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 37:893–920.

Kantrowitz, J. Katz, A. L. ; Paolitto, F. ; (1990). Followup of psychoanalysis five to ten years after termination: III. The relation of the transference neurosis to the patient-analyst match. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 38:655–678.

10.

Maldonado, J. L. (1984). Analyst involvement in the psychoanalytical impasse. Int. J. Psychoanal., 65:263–271.

11.

Pfeffer, A. Z. (1961). Followup study of a successful analysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 9:698–718.

12.

Pfeffer, A. Z. (1963). The meaning of the analyst after analysis: a contribution to the theory of therapeutic results. J. Amr. Psychoanal. Assn., 11:224–244.

13.

Poland, W. S. (1984). On the analyst's neutrality. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn. 32:283–299.

14.

Racker, H. (1968). Transference and Countertransference. New York: Int. Univ. Press.

15.

Reich, A (1960). Further remarks on countertransference. Int. J. Psychoanal., 32:25–31.

16.

Sandler, J. (1976). Countertransference and role-responsiveness. Int. Rev. Psychoanal, 3:43–47.

17.

Tower, L. E. (1956). Countertransference. J. Amer. Psychoanal Assn., 4:224–255.

18.

Tyson, R. L. (1986). Countertransference evolution in theory and practice. J. Amer. Psychoanal Assn., 34:251–274.