A Transitional Phase in our Understanding of the Psychoanalytic Process: A New Look at Ferenczi and Rank

Abstract

In The Development of Psychoanalysis, Ferenczi and Rank (1922) demonstrate an important transitional phase in the conceptualization of the psychoanalytic process. It is not the archaic language of libidinal flow that separates their work from modern psychoanalysis, but their insistence on the ideal of the analysts's objective authority, despite the implicitly more current interpersonal and structural understandings embedded in their sound principles of character analysis. Freud's early theory presumed the possibility that an analyst could be an objective observer of forces entirely within the patient. Today's theories must account for newer intrapsychic, interpersonal, and intersubjective realities-the analysts subjective experience as well as his observing functions. In the decade preceding the monograph, implicit developmental, structural, and object-relational understandings began to emerge. A concurrent dramatic but unacknowledged change in the meaning of the terms “psychic reality” and “intrapsychic” also occurred. The controversies surrounding the monograph predicted many lines of development and dialectics for future theoretical discourse. The subjects of counter transference and empathy, almost entirely absent in the monograph, became major fields of study, and focal points for divergent schools in the new struggle to define the necessary roles of the analyst's interaction and subjective experience.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Compton, A. (1981). On the psychoanalytic theory of instinctual drives–III: the complications of libido and narcissism. Psychoanal. Q., 50:345–362.

Compton, A. (1985). The concept of identification in the work of Freud, Ferenczi, and Abraham: a review and commentary. Psychoanal. Q., 54:200–233.

Ferenczi, S. (1909). Introjection and transference. In Sex and Psychoanalysis. New York: Dover, 1956, pp. 30–79.

Ferenczi, S. & Rank, O. (1922). The Development of Psychoanalysis. Madison, CT: Int. Univ. Press, 1986.

Freud, S. (1895). Studies on Hysteria, S. E, 2.

Freud, S. (1905a). Fragment of an analysis of a case of hysteria. S. S. E, 7.

Freud, S. (1905b). Three essays on the theory of sexuality. S. E, 7.

Freud, S. (1912). Recommendations to physicians practicing psycho-analysis. S. E, 12.

Freud, S. (1913). Totem and taboo. S. E., 13.

10.

Freud, S. (1914a). On narcissism. S. E., 14.

11.

Freud, S. (1914b). Remembering, repeating, and working through. S. E, 12.

12.

Freud, S. (1915a). The unconscious. S. E, 14.

13.

Freud, S. (1915b). Instincts and their vicissitudes. S. E, 14.

14.

Freud, S. (1918). From the history of an infantile neurosis. S. E, 17.

15.

Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the id. S. E., 19.

16.

Gedo, J. E. (1976). The wise baby reconsidered. In Freud: The Fusion of Science and Humanism, ed. J. E. Gedo & G. H. Pollock . Psychol. Issues, Monogr. 34/35. New York: Int. Univ. Press, pp. 357–378.

17.

Grubrich-Simitis, I. (1986). Six letters of Sigmund Freud and Sandor Ferenczi on the interrelationship of psychoanalytic theory and technique. Int. Rev. Psychoanal., 13:259–277.

18.

Hoffer, A. (1991). The Freud-Ferenczi controversy-a living legacy. Int. Rev. Psychoanal., 18:465–472.

19.

Loewald, H. W. (1980). Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.

20.

McLaughlin, J. T. (1981). Transference, psychic reality, and countertransference. Psychoanal. Q., 50:639–664.

21.

Schwaber, E. A. (1983). Psychoanalytic listening and psychic reality. Int. Rev. Psychoanal., 10:379–392.