In his seminal paper on acting out, Freud (1914) wrote: “We render the compulsion [to repeat] harmless, and indeed useful, by giving it the right to assert itself in a definite field. We admit it into the transference as a playground in which it is allowed to expand in almost complete freedom and in which it is expected to display to us everything in the way of pathogenic instincts that is hidden in the patients mind” (p. 154). This paper reexamines the ambiguous concept of acting out as both a resistance to and a useful component of the analytic process. Current concepts of repetition in the transference, enactment, and actualization avoid the pejorative connotation of acting out and, therefore, allow for a more neutral, analytic attitude toward these inevitable and vital components of the analytic process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Basch, M. F. (1974). Interference with perceptual transformation in the service of defense. Annual Psychoanal., 2:87–97.
2.
Basch, M. F. (1983). The perception of reality and the disavowal of meaning. Annual Psychoanal., 11:125–153.
3.
Bettelheim, B. (1975). The Uses of Enchantment: The Meaning and Importance of Fairy Tales. New York: Vintage, 1977.
4.
Bion, W. R. (1959). Attacks on linking. Int. J. Psychoanal., 40:308–315.
5.
Bird, B. (1972). Notes on transference: universal phenomenon and hardest part of the analysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 20:267–301.
6.
Blos, P. (1966). Discussion. In A Developmental Approach to Problems of Acting Out, ed. E. Rexford. New York: Int. Univ. Press, 1978, pp. 247–248.
7.
Blum, H. P. (1976). Acting out, the psychoanalytic process, and interpretation. Annual Psychoanal., 4:163–184.
8.
BOESKY, D. (1982). Acting out: a reconsideration of the concept. Int. J. Psychoanal., 63:39–55.
9.
BOESKY, D. (1990). The psychoanalytic process and its components. Psychoanal. Q., 59:550–584.
10.
Bower, G. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychol., 36:129–148.
11.
Brewer, W. (1988). Memory for randomly sampled autobiographical events. In Remembering Reconsidered: Ecological and Traditional Approaches to the Study of Memory, ed. U. Neisser & E. Winograd. Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge Univ. Press.
12.
Busch, F. (1989). The compulsion to repeat in action: a developmental perspective. Int. J. Psychoanal., 70:535–544.
13.
Casement, P. (1982). Some pressures on the analyst for physical contact during the re-living of an early trauma. Int. Rev. Psychoanal., 9:279–286.
14.
Chused, J. (1991). The evocative power of enactments. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 39:615–639.
15.
Clower, V. (1980). Comments on the application of the developmental point of view in psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Contemp. Thought, 3:171–193.
16.
Coen, S. (1992). The Misuse of Persons: Analyzing Pathological Dependency. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
17.
Deutsch, F. (1947). Analysis of postural behaviors. Psychoanal. Q., 16:195–213.
18.
Dorpat, T. (1983a). The cognitive arrest hypothesis of denial. Int. J. Psychoanal., 64:47–58.
Dorpat, T. (1987). A new look at denial and defense. Annual Psychoanal., 15:23–47.
21.
Dowling, S. (1982). Dreams and dreaming in relation to trauma in childhood. Int. J. Psychoanal., 63:157–166.
22.
Ekstein, R. (1965). A general treatment philosophy concerning acting out. In Acting Out: Theoretical and Clinical Aspects, ed. L. Abt & S. Weissman. New York: Grune & Stratton.
23.
Erdelyi, M. (1974). A new look at the new look: perceptual defense and vigilance. Psychol. Rev., 81:1–25.
24.
Fenichel, O. (1935). Concerning the theory of psychoanalytic technique. In The Collected Papers of Otto Fenichel, First Series. New York: Norton, pp. 332–348.
25.
Ferenczi, S. (1988). The Clinical Diary of Sandor Ferenczi, ed. J. Dupont. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
26.
Ferenczi, S. & Rank, O. (1923). The Development of Psychoanalysis. Madison, CT: Int. Univ. Press, 1986.
27.
Fox, R. (1984). The principle of abstinence reconsidered. Int. Rev. Psychoanal., 11:227–236.
28.
Frank, A. (1969). The unrememberable and the unforgettable. Psychoanal. Study Child, 24:48–77.
29.
Freud, A. (1968). Acting out. Int. J. Psychoanal., 49:165–170.
30.
Freud, S. (1905). Fragment of an analysis of a case of hysteria. S. E., 7.
31.
Freud, S. (1914). Remembering, repeating and working through. S. E., 12.
32.
Ganzarain, R. & Buchele, B. (1988). Fugitives from Incest: A Perspective from Psychoanalysis and Croups. Madison, CT: Int. Univ. Press.
33.
Greenacre, P. (1950). General problems of acting out. Psychoanal. Q., 19:455–467.
34.
Grinberg, L. (1962). On a specific aspect of countertransference due to the patient's projective identification. Int. J. Psychoanal., 43:436–440.
35.
Grubrich-Simitis, I. (1986). Six letters of Sigmund Freud and Sandor Ferenczi on the interrelationship of psychoanalytic theory and technique. Int. Rev. Psychoanal., 13:259–277.
36.
Haynal, A. (1988). The Technique at Issue: Controversies in Psychoanalysis from Freud and Ferenczi to Michael Balint. London: Karnac.
37.
Hoffer, A. (1991). The Freud-Ferenczi controversy: a living legacy. Int. Rev. Psychoanal., 18:465–472.
38.
Inderbitzin, L. (1988). Patients' sleep on the analytic couch. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 36:673–695.
39.
Jacobs, T. (1986). On countertransference enactments. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 34:289–307.
40.
Kernberg, O. F. (1984). Severe Personality Disorders: Psychotherapeutic Strategies. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
41.
Kernberg, O. F. (1987). Projection and projective identification: developmental and clinical aspects. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 35:795–819.
42.
Klein, M. (1946). Notes on some schizoid mechanisms. Int. J. Psychoanal., 27:99–110.
43.
Laplanche, J. & Pontalis, J.-B., Eds. (1973). The Language of Psychoanalysis. New York: Norton.
44.
Levine, H. B. (1990). Clinical issues in the analysis of adults who were sexually abused as children. In Adult Analysis and Childhood Sexual Abuse. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, pp. 197–218.
45.
Loewald, H. W. (1976). Perspectives on memory. In Psychology versus Metapsy-chology: Psychoanalytic Essays in Memory of George S. Klein, ed. M. M. Gill & P. Holzman. Psychol. Issues, Monogr. 36. New York: Int. Univ. Press, pp. 298–325.
46.
Loewald, H. W. (1986). Transference-countertransference. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 34:275–287.
47.
Mclaughlin, J. T. (1987). The play of transference: some reflections on enactment in the psychoanalytic situation. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 35:557–582.
48.
Mclaughlin, J. T. (1991). Clinical and theoretical aspects of enactment. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 39:595–614.
49.
Modell, A. H. (1976). “The holding environment” and the therapeutic action of psychoanalysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 24:285–307.
50.
Moore, B. E. (1968). Contribution to symposium on acting out. Int. J. Psychoanal., 49:182–184.
51.
Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and Reality: Principles and Implications of Cognitive Psychology. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
52.
Ogden, T. H. (1979). On projective identification. Int. J. Psychoanal., 60:357–373.
53.
Ogden, T. H. (1982). Projective Identification and Psychotherapeutic Technique. New York: Aronson.
54.
Ogden, T. H. (1983). The concept of internal object relations. Int. J. Psychoanal., 64:227–241.
55.
Panel (1992). Enactments in psychoanalysis. Reported by Morton Johan. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 40:827–841.
56.
Ogden, T. H. (in press). Classics revisited: Freud's papers on technique. Reported by Boyd L. Burris. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn.
57.
Poland, W. (1986). The analyst's words. Psychoanal. Q., 55:244–272.
58.
Poland, W. (1988). Insight and the analytic dyad. Psychoanal. Q., 57:341–369.
59.
Porder, M. S. (1987). Projective identification: an alternative hypothesis. Psychoanal. Q., 56:431–451.
60.
Racker, H. (1957). The meanings and uses of countertransference. Psychoanal. Q., 26:303–357.
61.
Rangell, L. (1981). From insight to change. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 29:119–131.
62.
Roughton, R. (in press). Action and acting out. In Psychoanalysis: The Major Concepts, ed. B. E. Moore. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
63.
Sandler, J. (1976a). Actualization and object relationships. J. Phila. Assn. Psychoanal., 3:59–70.
64.
Sandler, J. (1976b). Countertransference and role-responsiveness. Int. Rev. Psychoanal., 3:43–47.
65.
Sandler, J. (1976c). Dreams, unconscious fantasies, and “identity of perception.”Int. Rev. Psychoanal., 3:33–42.
66.
Sandler, J. & Sandler, A.-M. (1978). On the development of object relationships and affects. Int. J. Psychoanal., 59:285–296.
67.
Schafer, R. (1983). The Analytic Attitude. New York: Basic Books.
68.
Spiegel, D. et al. (1985). Hypnotic hallucination alters evoked potentials. J. Abnorm. Psychol, 94:249–255.
69.
Stone, L. (1961). The Psychoanalytic Situation: An Examination of Its Development and Essential Nature. New York: Int. Univ. Press.
70.
Valenstein, A. (1962). The psycho-analytic situation: affects, emotional reliving, and insight in the psycho-analytic process. Int. J. Psychoanal., 43:315–324.
71.
Winnicott, D. W. (1963a). Dependence in infant care, in child care, and in the psycho-analytic setting. Int. J. Psychoanal., 44:339–344.
72.
Winnicott, D. W. (1963b). Psychiatric disorder in terms of infantile maturational processes. In The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment. New York: Int. Univ. Press, 1965, pp. 230–241.
73.
Zeligs, M. (1957). Acting in: a contribution to the meaning of some postural attitudes observed during analysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 5:685–706.
