The concept of the analyst's interpretive fallibility is utilized to understand and organize the ways in which contemporary psychoanalytic theory has expanded on Freud's notions regarding the hypothetical nature of interpretation. This expansion involves a particular axis regarding the analyst's stance, an axis that cuts across theoretical scaffolding to include the analyst's view of symmetry and asymmetry in the analytic setting and the epistemological positions and preferences accorded to analyst and analysand. The ways in which the analyst constructs and imposes meaning are examined more specifically in the theories of Roy Schafer and Ernest S. Wolf The benefits and problems of constructivism in analytic stance are evaluated and illustrated through a case example. Finally, the notion of psychoanalytic neurality is reconsidered with regard to a series of tensions between the construction and foreclosure of meaning in the analytic situation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbendS. M. (1986). Countertransference, empathy, and the analytic ideal: the impact of life stresses on the analytic capability. Psychoanal. Q., 55:563–575
2.
AbendS. M. (1989). Countertransference and psychoanalytic technique. Psychoanal. Q., 58:374–395
3.
AbrahamK. (1921). Contributions to the theory of anal character. In Selected Papers.New York: Basic Books, 1953, pp. 370–392
4.
BalintM. (1968). The Bask Fault.New York: Brunner/Mazel
5.
BoeskyD. (1982). Acting out: a reconsideration of the concept. Int. J. Psychoanal., 63:39–55
6.
BollasC. (1989). Forces of Destiny: Psychoanalysis and Human Idiom.London: Free Association Books
7.
CooperA. M. (1987). Changes in psychoanalytic ideas: transference interpretation. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 35:77–98
8.
CooperS. H. (1989). Recent contributions to the theory of defense mechanisms: a comparative view. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 37:865–891
9.
EagleM. N. (1973). Validation of motivational formulations: acknowledgement as a criterion. Psychoanal. Contemp. Sci., 2:265–275
10.
EdelsonM. (1975). Language and Interpretation in Psychoanalysis.Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
11.
FerencziS. (1919). On the technique of psychoanalysis. In Further Contributions to the Technique of Psychoanalysis.New York: Basic Books, 1952, pp. 177–189
12.
FreudS. (1915). The unconscious. S. E., 14
13.
FreudS. (1937). Analysis terminable and interminable. S. E., 23
14.
GillM. M.GillM. M. (1982). Analysis of Transference II: Studies Nine Audio-Recorded Psychoanalytic Sessions. Psychol. Issues, Monogr. 54. New York: Int. Univ. Press
15.
GoldbergA. (1989). A shared view of the world. Int. J. Psychoanal., 7:16–20
16.
GrayP. (1982). Developmental lag in the evolution of analytic technique. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 30:621–639
GrünbaumA. (1984). The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique.Berkeley: Univ. California Press
19.
HartmannH. (1951). Technical implications of ego psychology. Psychoanal. Q., 20:31–43
20.
HoffmanI. Z. (1983). The patient as interpreter of the analyst's experience. Contemp. Psychoanal., 19:423
21.
HoffmanI. Z. (1991). Discussion: toward a social-constructionist view of the psychoanalytic situation. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 1:74–105
22.
KohutH. (1971). The Analysis of the Self.New York: Int. Univ. Press
23.
KohutH. (1979). The two analyses of Mr. Z. Int. J Psychoanal., 60:3–27
24.
KohutH. (1984). How Does Analysis Cure?Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
25.
KrisA. O. (1982). Free Association: Method and Process.New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
26.
KrisA. O. (1984). The conflicts of ambivalence. Psychoanal. Study Child, 39:213–234
27.
KrisA. O. (1985). Resistance in convergent and in divergent conflicts. Psychoanal. Q., 54:537–568
28.
KrisA. O. (1990). Helping patients by analyzing self-criticism. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 38:605–636
29.
KrisE. (1956a). On some vicissitudes of insight in psychoanalysis. Int. J. Psychoanal., 37:445–461
30.
KrisE. (1956b). The recovery of childhood memories in psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Study Child, 11:54–71
31.
LachmannF. M. (1986). Interpretation of psychic conflict and adversarial relationships: a self-psychological perspective. Psychoanal. Psychol., 3:341–356
32.
LangsR. J. (1978). Technique in Transition.New York: Aronson
33.
LevensonE. (1983). The Ambiguity of Change: an Inquiry into the Nature of Psychoanalytic Reality.New York: Basic Books
34.
LoewensteinR. M. (1957). Some thoughts on interpretation in the theory and practice of psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Study Child, 12:127–150
35.
McLaughlinJ. T. (1981). Transference, psychic reality, and countertransference. Psychoanal. Q., 50:639–664
36.
MichelsR. (1985). Introduction to panel: perspectives on the nature of psychic reality. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 33:515–519
37.
MitchellS. A. (1988). Relational Concepts in Psychoanalysis: An Integration.Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
38.
ModellA. H. (1990). Other Times, Other Realities: Toward a Theory of Psychoanalytic Treatment.Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
39.
ModellA. H. (1991). The therapeutic relationship as a paradoxical experience. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 1:13–28
40.
PolandW. S. (1975). Tact as a psychoanalytic function. Int. J. Psychoanal., 56:155–167
41.
RamzyI. (1974). How the mind of the psychoanalyst works: an essay on psychoanalytic inference. Int. J. Psychoanal., 55:543–550
42.
RamzyI.RamzyI. (1987). The nature of inference process in psychoanalytic interpretation: a critical review of the literature. Int. J. Psychoanal., 57:151–159
43.
RicoeurP. (1977). The question of proof in Freud's psychoanalytic writings. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 24:835–871
44.
SandlerJ. (1976). Countertransference and role-responsiveness. Int. Rev. Psychoanal., 3:43–47
45.
SchaferR. (1976). A New Language for Psychoanalysis.New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
46.
SchaferR. (1983). The Analytic Attitude.New York: Basic Books
47.
SchaferR. (1985a). Wild analysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 33:275–300
48.
SchaferR. (1985b). The interpretation of psychic reality, developmental influences, and unconscious communication. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 33:537–554
49.
SchmidlF. (1955). The problem of scientific validation of interpretation. Int. J. Psychoanal., 36:105–113
50.
SchwaberE. A. (1983). Psychoanalytic listening and psychic reality. Int. Rev. Psychoanal., 10:379–392
51.
SpenceD. P. (1982). Narrative Truth and Historical Truth: Meaning and Interpretation in Psychoanalysis.New York: Norton
52.
SternD. N. (1985). Some controversies regarding constructivism and psychoanalysis. Contemp. Psychoanal., 21:201–208
TenzerA. (1985). Constructing new truths. Contemp. Psychoanal., 21:228–236
55.
WallersteinR. S. (1985). The concept of psychic reality: its meaning and value. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 33:555–569
56.
WillburnD. (1979). Freud and the interpenetration of dreams. Diacritics, 9:98–110
57.
WolfE. S. (1986). Discrepancies between analysand and analyst in experiencing the analysis. In Progress in Self Psychology, Vol. 2, ed. GoldbergA.. New York: Guilford Press
58.
WolfE. S. (1989). Therapeutic experiences. In Progress in Self Psychology, Vol. 5, ed. GoldbergA.. New York: Guilford Press
