Clinical interpretation is difficult and fallible. Basic methodologic problems make errors inevitable in interpretive work. This report reviews some of the major problems and limitations of interpretive methodology, and describes remedial strategies for dealing with them, i.e., “learning from error” by use of error-detecting, error-correcting, and validating procedures.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbrahamI. L. (1986). Diagnostic discrepancy and clinical inference: a social-cognitive analysis. Genet. Soc. Gen. Psychol. Monogr., 112:41–102
2.
AndersonC. A. (1983). Abstract and concrete data in the perseverance of social theories: when weak data lead to unshakable beliefs. J. Exper. Soc. Psychol., 19:93–108
3.
ArkesH. R. (1981). Impediments to accurate clinical judgment and possible ways to minimize their impact. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol., 49:323–330
4.
ArnoffF. N. (1954). Some factors influencing the unreliability of clinical judgments. J. Clin. Psychol., 44:272–277
5.
BartlettF. C. (1958). Thinking.New York: Basic Books
6.
BerksonW.BerksonW. (1984). Learning from Error: Karl Popper's Psychology of Learning.La Salle, Ill.: Open Court
7.
BernardiR. E. (1989). The role of paradigmatic determinants in psychoanalytic understanding. Int. J. Psychoanal., 70:341–357
8.
BernsteinR. J. (1988). Interpretation and its discontents: the choreography of critique. In Hermeneutics and Psychological Theory: Interpretive Perspectives on Personality, Psychotherapy, and Psychopathology, ed. MesserS.SassL.MesserS.SassL.. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers Univ. Press, pp. 87–108
9.
CastonJ. (1986). The reliability of the diagnosis of the patient's unconscious plan. In The Psychoanalytic Process: Theory, Clinical Observations, and Empirical Research, ed. WeissJ.WeissJ.. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 241–255
10.
ChapmanL. J.ChapmanL. J. (1967). Genesis of popular but erroneous psychodiagnostic observations. J. Abnorm. Psychol., 72:193–204
11.
CheshireN. M. (1975). The Nature of Psychodynamic Interpretation.London: Wiley
12.
CooperA.CooperA. (1988). The accuracy of therapists' interpretations and the outcome of dynamic psychotherapy. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol., 56:490–495
13.
Crits-ChristophP.LuborskyL.DahlL. (1988). Clinicians can agree in assessing relationship patterns in psychotherapy: the core conflictual relationship theme method. Arch. Gen. Psychiat., 45:1001–1004
14.
Crits-ChristophP.Crits-ChristophP. (1989). The CCRT as a measure of outcome in psychoanalytic psychotherapy. In The Scientific Foundations of Psychoanalysis, ed. GhannamJ.. New York: Guilford Press
15.
DancyJ. (1985). An Introduction to Contemporary Epistemology.Oxford, Eng.: Basil Blackwell
16.
DarwinC. (1888). The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin.New York: Basic Books, 1959
17.
DavidsonD. (1986). A coherence theory of truth and knowledge. In Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, ed. LePoreE.. Oxford, Eng.: Basil Blackwell, pp. 307–319
18.
De GrootA. D. (1969). Methodology: Foundations of Inference and Research in the Behavioral Sciences.The Hague: Mouton
19.
DiesingP. (1971). Patterns of Discovery in the Social Sciences.Chicago: Aldine
20.
DiesingP. (1985a). Hypothesis testing and data interpretation: the case of Milton Friedman. Res. Hist. Econ. Thought Methodol., 3:61–89
21.
DiesingP. (1985b). Comments on “Why Freud's research methodology was unscientific” by von Eckhardt. Psychoanal. Contemp. Thought, 8:551–566
22.
DohertyM. E.MynattC. R.TweneyR. D. (1979). Pseudodiagnosticity. Acta Psychol., 43:111–121
23.
EagleM. N. (1980). Psychoanalytic interpretations: veridicality and therapeutic effectiveness. Noûs, 14:405–425
24.
EcclesJ. C. (1974). The world of objective knowledge. In The Philosophy of Karl Popper, ed. SchilppP.. LaSalle, Ill.: Open Court, pp. 349–350
25.
EdelsonM. (1976). Toward a study of interpretation in psychoanalysis. In Explorations in General Theory in Social Science, ed. LoubserJ.BaumR.EffratE.. New York: Free Press, pp. 151–181
26.
EdelsonM. (1983). Is testing psychoanalytic hypotheses in the psychoanalytic situation really impossible?Psychoanal. Study Child, 38:61–104
27.
EdelsonM. (1984). Hypothesis and Evidence in Psychoanalysis.Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
28.
EdelsonM. (1988). Psychoanalysis: A Theory in Crisis.Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
29.
EinhornH. J. (1988). Diagnosis and causality in clinical and statistical prediction. In Reasoning, Inference, and Judgment in Clinical Psychology, ed. TurkD.TurkD.. New York: Free Press, pp. 51–69
30.
EinhornH. J.EinhornH. J. (1978). Confidence in judgment: persistence of the illusion of validity. Psychol. Rev., 85:395–416
31.
EksteinR. (1959). Thoughts concerning the nature of the interpretive process. In Readings in Psychoanalytic Psychology, ed. LevittM.. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, pp. 221–247
32.
ElsteinA. S. (1988). Cognitive processes in clinical inference and decision making. In Reasoning, Inference, and Judgment in Clinical Psychology, ed. TurkD.TurkD.. New York: Free Press, pp. 17–50
33.
EtchegoyenR. H. (1989). On interpretation and its testing. In The Psychoanalytic Core, ed. BlumH. P.WeinshelE.BlumH. P.WeinshelE.. Madison, Conn.: Int. Univ. Press, pp. 309–398
34.
FaustD. (1984). The Limits of Scientific Judgment.Minneapolis: Univ. Minnesota Press
35.
FisherS.FisherS. (1977). The Scientific Credibility of Freud's Theories and Therapy.New York: Basic Books
36.
FiskeD. W.FiskeD. W. (1986). Metatheory in Social Science: Pluralities and Subjectivities.Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
37.
FosshageJ. L.FosshageJ. L., Eds. (1987). Dream Interpretation: A Comparative Study (rev. ed.). New York: PMA
38.
FrankP. (1957). Philosophy of Science.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall
39.
FrenchT. M. (1958). The art and science of psychoanalysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 6:197–214
40.
FreudS. (1900). The interpretation of dreams. S. E., 4 & 5
41.
FreudS. (1909). Notes upon a case of obsessional neurosis. S. E., 10
42.
FreudS. (1911). The handling of dream interpretation in psychoanalysis. S. E., 12
43.
FreudS. (1912). Recommendations to physicians practicing psychoanalysis. S. E., 12
44.
FreudS. (1914). Remembering, repeating and working through (further recommendations on the technique of psychoanalysis, II). S. E., 12
45.
FreudS. (1915). Observations on transference love (further recommendations on the technique of psychoanalysis, III). S. E., 12
46.
FreudS. (1915–1917). Introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. S. E., 15 & 16
47.
FreudS. (1919). “A child is being beaten”: a contribution to the study of the perversions. S. E., 17
48.
FreudS. (1920). The psychogenesis of a case of homosexuality in a woman. S. E., 18
49.
FreudS. (1922). Some neurotic mechanisms in jealousy, paranoia and homosexuality. S. E., 18
50.
FreudS. (1923). Remarks on the theory and practice of dream interpretation. S. E., 19
51.
FreudS. (1924). A short account of psychoanalysis. S. E., 19
52.
FreudS. (1925). Some additional notes on dream interpretation as a whole. S. E., 19
53.
FreudS. (1937). Constructions in analysis. S. E., 23
54.
FreudS. (1940). An outline of psychoanalysis. S. E., 23
55.
GedoJ. E. (1986). Relevance or reductionism in interpretation: a reprise on the psychoanalysis of Kleist's puppet theatre. In Conceptual Issues in Psychoanalysis.Hillsdale, N.J.: Analytic Press, pp. 186–199
56.
GellerE. S.GellerE. S. (1968). Confidence and decision speed in the revision of opinion. Organiz. Behav. Human Perform., 3:190–201
57.
GergenK. J. (1988). If persons are texts. In Hermeneutics and Psychological Theory: Interpretive Perspectives on Personality, Psychotherapy, and Psychopathology, ed. MesserS.SassL.MesserS.SassL.. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers Univ. Press, pp. 28–51
58.
GloverE. (1952). Research methods in psychoanalysis. Int. J. Psychoanal., 33:403–409
59.
GoldbergL. R. (1968). Simple models or simple processes? Some research on clinical judgments. Amer. Psychol., 23:483–496
60.
GoldbergL. R.GoldbergL. R. (1966). The reliability of clinicians' judgments: a multitrait-multimethod approach. J. Consult. Psychol., 30:199–206
61.
GordonC. H. (1982). Forgotten Scripts: Their Ongoing Discovery and Decipherment.New York: Basic Books
62.
GrünbaumA. (1984). The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique.Berkeley: Univ. California Press
63.
HanlyC. (1990). The concept of truth in psychoanalysis. Int. J. Psychoanal., 71:375–383
64.
HirschE. D.Jr. (1967). Validity in Interpretation.New Haven: Yale Univ. Press
65.
HirschE. D.Jr. (1976). The Aims of Interpretation.Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
66.
HirschE. D.Jr. (1983). The politics of theories of interpretation. In The Politics of Interpretation, ed. MitchellW.. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, pp. 321–333
67.
HoltR. R. (1988). Judgment, inference, and reasoning in clinical perspective. In Reasoning, Inference, and Judgment in Clinical Psychology, ed. TurkD.TurkD.. New York: Free Press, pp. 233–249
68.
HorowitzM. J. (1987). States of Mind: Configurational Analysis of Individual Psychotherapy (2nd ed.). Northvale, N.J.: Aronson
69.
JelalianE.JelalianE. (1984). The perseverance of beliefs: conceptual perspectives and research developments. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol., 2:25–26
70.
JordanJ. S.HarveyJ. H.JordanJ. S.HarveyJ. H. (1988). Attributional biases in clinical decision making. In Reasoning, Inference and Judgment in Clinical Psychology, ed. TurkD.TurkD.. New York: Free Press, pp. 90–106
71.
KächeleH. (1988). Clinical and scientific aspects of the Ulm process model of psychoanalysis. Int. J. Psychoanal., 69:65–71
72.
KahnemanD.SlovicP.KahnemanD.SlovicP., Eds. (1982). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
73.
KahnemanD.KahnemanD. (1982). Intuitive prediction: biases and corrective procedures. In Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, ed. KahnemanD.SlovicP.KahnemanD.SlovicP.. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 414–421
74.
KaplanA. (1964). The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioral Science.New York: Crowell
75.
KlauberJ. (1968). On the dual use of historical and scientific method in psychoanalysis. Int. J. Psychoanal., 49:80–88
76.
KohutH. (1959). Introspection, empathy, and psychoanalysis: an examination of the relationship between mode of observation and theory. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 7:459–483
77.
KohutH. (1984). How Does Analysis Cure?Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
78.
KrisA. O. (1983). The analyst's conceptual freedom in the method of free association. Int. J. Psychoanal., 64:408–411
79.
LarrabeeH. A. (1964). Reliable Knowledge: Scientific Methods in the Social Studies (rev. ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin
80.
LeavyS. A. (1980). The Psychoanalytic Dialogue.New Haven: Yale Univ. Press
81.
LevensonE. A. (1972). The Fallacy of Understanding: An Inquiry into the Changing Structure of Psychoanalysis.New York: Basic Books
82.
LevineF. J.LevineF. J. (1981). The core conflictual relationship theme—a demonstration of reliable clinical inference by the method of mismatched cases. In Object and Self: A Developmental Approach. Essays in Honor of Edith Jacobson, ed. TuttmanA.KayeC.TuttmanA.KayeC.. New York: Int. Univ. Press, pp. 501–526
83.
LittleR. M. (1959). Problems in the validation of projective techniques. J. Proj. Tech., 23:287–290
84.
LoewensteinR. M. (1957). Some thoughts on interpretation in the theory and practice of psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Study Child, 12:127–150
85.
LuborskyL. (1977). Measuring a pervasive psychic structure in psychotherapy. In Communicative Structures and Psychic Structures, ed. FreedmanN.FreedmanN.. New York: Plenum, pp. 367–395
86.
LuborskyL.LuborskyL. (1988). Measures of psychoanalytic concepts—the last decade of research from “the Penn studies.”Int. J. Psychoanal., 69:75–86
87.
LuborskyL.MellonJ.AlexanderK. (1985). A verification of Freud's grandest clinical hypothesis: the transference. Clin. Psychol. Rev., 5:231–246
88.
MahoneyM. J.MahoneyM. J. (1977). Psychology of the scientist: an analysis of problem-solving bias. Cogn. Ther. Res., 1:229–238
89.
McIntoshD. (1979). The empirical bearing of psychoanalytic theory. Int. J. Psychoanal., 60:405–431
90.
MeehlP. E. (1973). Some methodological reflections on the difficulties of psychoanalytic research. In Psychoanalytic Research: Three Approaches to the Experimental Study of Subliminal Processes, ed. MaymanM.. Psychol. Issues, Monogr. 30. New York: Int. Univ. Press, pp. 104–117
91.
MeissnerW. W. (1984). Models in the mind: the role of theory in the psychoanalytic process. Psychoanal. Inq., 4:5–32
92.
MitroffI. (1974). The Subjective Side of Science.Amsterdam: Elsevier
93.
MynattC. R.DohertyM. E.MynattC. R.DohertyM. E. (1977). Confirmation bias in a simulated research environment: an experimental study of scientific inference. Q. J. Exper. Psychol., 29:85–95
94.
NisbettR. E.NisbettR. E. (1980). Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall
95.
NunbergH.NunbergH., Eds. (1962). Minutes of the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society, Vol. 1: 1906–1908.New York: Int. Univ. Press
96.
OskampS. (1965). Overconfidence in case study judgments. J. Consult. Psychol., 29:261–265
97.
Panel (1955). Validation of psychoanalytic techniques. J. Marmor, reporter. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 3:496–505
98.
PaniaguaC. (1985). A methodological approach to surface material. Int. J. Psychoanal., 12:311–325
99.
PeterfreundE. (1971). Information, Systems, and Psychoanalysis: An Evolutionary Biological Approach to Psychoanalytic Theory. Psychol. Issues, Monogr. 25/26. New York: Int. Univ. Press
100.
PeterfreundE. (1983). The Process of Psychoanalytic Therapy: Models and Strategies.Hillsdale, N.J.: Analytic Press
101.
PlattJ. R. (1964). Strong inference. Science, 146:347–353
102.
PolkinghorneD. (1983). Methodology for the Human Sciences: Systems of Inquiry.Albany: State Univ. New York Press
103.
PolyaG. (1945). How to Solve It.Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press
104.
PopperK. (1963). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge (rev. ed.). New York: Harper
105.
PopperK. (1968). The Logic of Scientific Discovery (3rd rev. ed.) London: Hutchinson
106.
RamzyI. (1974). How the mind of the psychoanalyst works: an essay on psychoanalytic inference. Int. J. Psychoanal., 55:543–550
107.
RamzyI.RamzyI. (1976). The nature of the inference process in psychoanalytic interpretations: a critical review of the literature. Int. J. Psychoanal., 57:151–160
108.
RangellL. (1987). Historical perspectives and current status of the interpretation of dreams in clinical work. In The Interpretation of Dreams in Clinical Work, ed. RothsteinA.. Madison, Conn.: Int. Univ. Press, pp. 3–24
109.
RapaportD. (1967). The scientific methodology of psychoanalysis. In Collected Papers of David Rapaport, ed. GillM. M.. N.Y.: Basic Books, pp. 165–220
110.
ReichenbachH. (1951). The Rise of Scientific Philosophy.Berkeley: Univ. California Press
111.
RicœurP. (1970). Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation.New Haven: Yale Univ. Press
112.
RogersR. (1982). Amazing reader in the labyrinth of literature. Poetics Today, 3:31–46
113.
RosenbaumM.RosenbaumM., Eds. (1984). Anna O.New York: Free Press
114.
RosenbergS.SilberschatzG.CurtisJ. (1986). A method of establishing reliability of statements from psychodynamic case formulations. Amer. J. Psychiat., 143:1454–1456
115.
Rubovits-SeitzP. F. D. (1986). Clinical interpretation, hermeneutics and the problem of validation. Psychoanal. Contemp. Thought, 9:3–42
116.
Rubovits-SeitzP. F. D. (1987). The Validation of Interpretations and Reconstructions: A Pluralistic Investigative Approach.La Jolla, Calif.: Herman M. Serota Foundation, unpublished
117.
Rubovits-SeitzP. F. D. (1988). Kohut's method of interpretation: a critique. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 36:933–959
118.
RunyonW. M. (1981). Why did Van Gogh cut off his ear? The problem of alternative explanations in psychobiography. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol., 40:1070–1077
119.
SassL. A. (1988). Humanism, hermeneutics, and the concept of the human subject. In Hermeneutics and Psychological Theory: Interpretive Perspectives on Personality, Psychotherapy, and Psychopathology, ed. MesserS.SassL.MesserS.SassL.. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers Univ. Press, pp. 222–271
120.
SchimekJ. (1975). The interpretations of the past: childhood trauma, psychical reality, and historical truth. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 23:845–865
121.
SeitzP. F. D. (1966). The consensus problem in psychoanalytic research. In Methods of Research in Psychotherapy, ed. GottschalkL.GottschalkL.. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, pp. 209–225
122.
SeitzP. F. D. (1969). Cycles and subcycles in the analytic process. Abstracted in Bull. Phila. Assn. Psychoanal., 19:97–100
123.
ShakleeH.ShakleeH. (1982). Strategies of information search in causal analysis. Memory & Cognition, 10:520–530
124.
SilberschatzG.CurtisJ. T.FretterP. B.SilberschatzG.CurtisJ. T.FretterP. B. (1988). Testing hypothese of psychotherapeutic change processes. In Psychoanalytic Process Research Strategies, ed. DahlH.KöcheleH.DahlH.KöcheleH.New York: Springer, pp. 129–145
125.
SklanskyM. A.IsaacsK. S.LevitovE. S. (1966). Verbal interaction and levels of meaning in psychotherapy. Arch. Gen. Psychiat., 14:158–170
126.
SnyderM. (1981). Seek, and ye shall find: testing hypotheses about other people. In Social Cognition: The Ontario Symposium, Vol. 1, ed. HigginsE.HermanC.HigginsE.HermanC.. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, pp. 277–303
127.
SnyderM.SnyderM. (1988). Interactions between therapists and clients: hypothesis testing and behavioral confirmation. In Reasoning, Inference, and Judgment in Clinical Psychology, ed. TurkD.TurkD.. New York: Free Press, pp. 124–152
128.
SpenceD. P. (1982). Narrative Truth and Historical Truth: Meaning and Interpretation in Psychoanalysis.New York: Norton
129.
TellerV.TellerV. (1986). The microstructure of free association. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 34:763–798
130.
ThomäH.GrünzigH. J.BöckenfördeH. (1976). Das Konsensus Problem in der Psychoanalyse. Psyche, 30:978–1027
131.
ThomäH.ThomäH. (1987). Psychoanalytic Practice: I. Principles.New York: Springer Verlag
132.
TurkD. C.TurkD. C., Eds. (1988). Reasoning, Inference, and Judgment in Clinical Psychology.New York: Free Press
133.
TverskyA.TverskyA. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science, 185:1124–1131
134.
TweneyR. D.DohertyM. F.TweneyR. D.DohertyM. F., Eds. (1981). On Scientific Thinking.New York: Columbia Univ. Press
135.
WaelderR. (1962). Psychoanalysis, scientific method, and philosophy. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 10:617–637
136.
WeberJ.ElinsonJ.WeberJ.ElinsonJ. (1966). The application of ego strength scales to psychoanalytic clinic records. In Developments in Psychoanalysis at Columbia University, ed. GoldmanG.GoldmanG.. New York: Hafner, pp. 215–281
137.
WermanD. (1979). Methodological problems in the psychoanalytic interpretation of literature: a review of studies on Sophocles' Antigone. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 27:451–478
138.
WilsonM. E. DallasWilsonM. E. Dallas (1985). Do psychotherapists use a confirmatory strategy during interviewing?J. Soc. Clin. Psychol., 3:106–122
139.
WisdomJ. O. (1967). Testing an interpretation within a session. Int. J. Psychoanal., 48:44–52
140.
WolfsonA.WolfsonA. (1976). A comparison of process notes and tape recordings—implications for therapy research. Arch. Gen. Psychiat., 33:558–563
