Freud used a spatial model of mental organization, derived from his explanation of aphasia, as an organizing framework for psychoanalytic theory. He introduced the ideas of representation and over-determination to describe relations of the contents of systems that were joined to form, first, a hierarchical nervous system, then, mental systems. Freud used his basic model to organize aspects of mental function and phenomena, of interpersonal and social phenomena, and some kinds of biological phenomena. His accounts of metapsychology and clinical psychoanalysis are similar to his description of the basic aphasia/nervous system model. Across the boundaries of mental systems, translation of the contents of one system led to their being represented in another. Repeated editing and translation account for many properties of the systems. The mind pictured is a hierarchical structure of agencies, functions, and fantasy organizations. Complexity results from the combination of relatively simple relations and repetition of the same operations. The mind described by Freud's psychoanalysis is the self-reflecting mind and the mental activity of an analyst and of a patient in analysis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArlowJ. A. (1979). Metaphor and the psychoanalytic situation. Psychoanal. Q., 48:363–385
2.
BoydR. (1979). Metaphor and theory change: what is “metaphor” a metaphor for? In Ortony (1979), pp. 356–408
3.
BreuerJ.BreuerJ. (1895). Studies on hysteria. S. E., 2
4.
CanningJ. W. (1966). A Logical Analysis of Criticisms Directed at Freudian Psychoanalytic Theory.Ann Arbor: U.M.I. Dissertation Information Service
5.
DavidsonD. (1978). What metaphors mean. In Philosophical Perspectives on Metaphor, ed. JohnsonM.. Minneapolis: Univ. Minnesota Press, 1981, pp. 200–220
6.
DerridaJ. (1978). Legs de Freud. Études Freudiennes, nos. 13–14:87–125
7.
EcoU. (1986). Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language.Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press
8.
EdelheitH. (1969). Speech and psychic structure. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 17:381–412
9.
EdelheitH. (1978). On the biology of language: Darwinian/Lamarckian homology in human inheritance (with some thoughts about the Lamarckianism of Freud). Psychiat. & Humanities, 3:45–74
10.
EinsteinA. (1914). Inaugural address to the Prussian Academy of Sciences. In Essays in Science.New York: Philosophical Library, 1934, pp. 6–10
11.
EinsteinA. (1934). On the method of theoretical physics. In Essays in Science.New York: Philosophical Library, p. 15
12.
EinsteinA. (1936). Physics and reality. In Out of My Later Years.Secaucus, N.J.: Citadel Press, 1956, pp. 59–97
13.
ErdelyiM. H. (1985). Psychoanalysis: Freud's Cognitive Psychology.New York: W. H. Freeman
ForresterJ. (1980). Language and the Origins of Psychoanalysis.New York: Columbia Univ. Press
16.
FoucaultM. (1970). The Order of Things.New York: Pantheon
17.
FoucaultM. (1982). This Is Not a Pipe.Berkeley & Los Angeles: Univ. California Press
18.
FreudS. (1891). On Aphasia.New York: Int. Univ. Press, 1953
19.
FreudS. (1893). Some points for a comparative study of organic and hysterical motor paralyses. S. E., 1
20.
FreudS. (1895). Psychology for neurologists. S. E., 1
21.
FreudS. (1896a). The aetiology of hysteria. S. E., 3
22.
FreudS. (1896b). Letter of 6.12. In The Complete Letters of Sigmund Freud to Wilhelm Fliess, 1887–1904, ed. MassonJ. M.. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press, 1985, p. 207
23.
FreudS. (1898). The psychical mechanism of forgetfulness. S. E., 3
24.
FreudS. (1900). The interpretation of dreams. S. E., 4 & 5
25.
FreudS. (1901). The psychopathology of everyday life. S. E., 6
26.
FreudS. (1905a). Fragment of the analysis of a case of hysteria. S. E., 7
27.
FreudS. (1905b). Jokes and their relation to the unconscious. S. E., 8
28.
FreudS. (1909). Notes upon a case of obsessional neurosis. S. E., 10
29.
FreudS. (1910a). Five lectures on psycho-analysis. S. E., 11
30.
FreudS. (1910b). A special type of object choice made by men. S. E., 11
31.
FreudS. (1911). The handling of dream-interpretation in psycho-analysis. S. E., 12
32.
FreudS. (1912). On the universal tendency to debasement in the sphere of love. S. E., 11
33.
FreudS. (1913a). The claims of psycho-analysis to scientific interest. S. E., 13
34.
FreudS. (1913b). The disposition to obsessional neurosis. S. E., 12
35.
FreudS. (1914a). On narcissism: an introduction. S. E., 14
36.
FreudS. (1914b). Remembering, repeating and working through. S. E., 12
37.
FreudS. (1915a). Instincts and their vicissitudes. S. E., 14
38.
FreudS. (1915b). Repression. S. E., 14.
39.
FreudS. (1915c). The unconscious. S. E., 14
40.
FreudS. (1916–1917). Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. S. E., 15 & 16
41.
FreudS. (1917). On transformations of instinct as exemplified in anal erotism. S. E., 17
42.
FreudS. (1920). Beyond the pleasure principle. S. E., 18
43.
FreudS. (1924). The economic problem of masochism. S. E., 19
44.
FreudS. (1923). The ego and the id. S. E., 19
45.
FreudS. (1925). An autobiographical study. S. E., 20
46.
FreudS. (1930). Civilization and its discontents. S. E., 21
47.
FreudS. (1933). New introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. S. E., 22
48.
FreudS. (1935). Freud and female sexuality: a previously unpublished letter. Psychiat., 34:328–329, 1971
49.
FreudS. (1939). Moses and monotheism. S. E., 23
50.
FreudS. (1940). An outline of psycho-analysis. S. E., 23
51.
FreudS. (1941). Findings, ideas, problems. S. E., 23
52.
GrossmanW. I. (1986). Freud and Horney: a study of psychoanalytic models via the analysis of a controversy. In Psychoanalysis: The Science of Mental Conflict, ed. RichardsA. D.RichardsA. D.. Hillsdale, N.J.: Analytic Press, pp. 65–87
53.
GrossmanW. I.GrossmanW. I. (1969). Anthropomorphism: motive, meaning, and causality in psychoanalytic theory. Psychoanal. Study Child, 24:78–111
54.
HartmannH.KrisE.HartmannH.KrisE. (1946). Comments on the formation of psychic structure. Psychoanal. Study Child, 2:11–38
55.
HoltR. R. (1964). A review of some of Freud's biological assumptions and their influence on his theories. In Psychoanalysis and Current Biological Thought, ed. GreenfieldN. S.GreenfieldN. S.. Madison & Milwaukee: Univ. Wisconsin Press, pp. 93–124
56.
HoltR. R. (1972). Freud's mechanistic and humanistic images of man. Psychoanal. Contemp. Sci., 1:3–24
57.
JakobsonR.JakobsonR. (1983). Dialogues.Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
58.
JohnsonM. (1981). Philosophical Perspectives on Metaphor.Minneapolis: Univ. Minnesota Press
59.
KanzerM. (1973). Two prevalent misconceptions about Freud's “Project” (1895). Ann. Psychoanal., 1:88–103
60.
KaplanD. M. (1988). The psychoanalysis of art: some ends, some means. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 36:258–293
61.
KaplanD. M. (1990). Some theoretical and technical aspects of gender and social reality in clinical psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Study Child, 45:3–24
62.
KittayE. F. (1987). Metaphor: Its Cognitive Force and Linguistic Structure.Oxford, Eng.: Oxford Univ. Press
63.
KosslynS. M. (1988). Aspects of a cognitive neuroscience of mental imagery. Science, 240:1621–1626
64.
LaddG. T. (1895). Philosophy of Mind: An Essay in the Metaphysics of Psychology.New York: AMS Press, 1983, pp. 294–295
65.
LevinK. (1978). Freud's Early Psychology of the Neuroses: A Historical Perspective.Pittsburgh, Pa.: Univ. Pittsburgh Press
66.
MahonyP. J. (1986). Freud and the Rat Man.New Haven: Yale Univ. Press
67.
MahonyP. J. (1987). Freud as a Writer.New Haven: Yale Univ. Press
68.
ManciaM. (1983). Archaeology of Freudian thought and the history of neurophysiology. Int. Rev. Psychoanal., 10(2): 185–192
69.
MarshallJ. C. (1974). Freud's psychology of language. In Philosophers on Freud: New Evaluations, ed. WollheimR.. New York: Aronson, pp. 349–365
70.
MarxO. M. (1967). Freud and aphasia: an historical analysis. Amer. J. Psychiat., 124:815–825
71.
MillerG. A. (1979). Images and models, similes and metaphors. In Ortony (1979), pp. 202–250
72.
OrtonyA. (1979). Metaphor and Thought.Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge Univ. Press
73.
RizzutoA.-M. (1989). A hypothesis about Freud's motive for writing the monograph “On Aphasia.”Int. Rev. Psychoanal., 16:111–118
74.
RizzutoA.-M. (1990). The origins of Freud's concept of object representation (Objektvorstellung) in his monograph “On Aphasia”: its theoretical and technical importance. Int. J. Psychoanal., 71:241–248
75.
RubinsteinB. B. (1972). On metaphor and related phenomena. Psychoanal. Contemp. Sci., 1:70–108
76.
SchaferR. (1968). Aspects of Internalization.New York: Int. Univ. Press
77.
SchaferR. (1976). A New Language for Psychoanalysis.New Haven: Yale Univ. Press
78.
SchaferR. (1980). Narration in the psychoanalytic dialogue. Critical Inq., 7(1):21–53
79.
SolmsM.SolmsM. (1986). On psychoanalysis and neuroscience: Freud's attitude to the localizationist tradition. Int. J. Psychoanal., 67(4):397–416
80.
SolomonR. C. (1974). Freud's neurological theory of mind. In Philosophers on Freud: New Evaluations, ed. WollheimR.. New York: Aronson, pp. 25–52
81.
StengelE. (1954). A re-evaluation of Freud's book “On Aphasia.” Its significance for psycho-analysis. Int. J. Psychoanal., 35(2):85–89
82.
StoppardT. (1989). Double agents: espionage and the uncertainty principle. The Sciences, Sept./Oct., pp. 36–37
83.
WurmserL. (1977). A defense of the use of metaphor in psychoanalytic theory construction. Psychoanal. Q., 46:466–498
84.
YoungR. M. (1970). Mind, Brain and Adaptation in the Nineteenth Century: Cerebral Localization and Its Biological Context from Gall to Ferrier.Oxford, Eng.: Clarendon
