Current controversies about the centrality of the Oedipus complex in psychoanalysis are difficult to resolve unless we address three obstacles in the way of rational examination. The first is that the Oedipus complex, Freud's “shibboleth” of psychoanalysis, is politically controversial. Second is the great difficulty in agreeing upon the definition and boundaries of the Oedipus complex, especially the necessary complexities introduced with the negative Oedipus complex, female sexuality, the nature of the preoedipal, and counteroedipal fantasies and actions. The third obstacle involves basic questions of psychoanalytic epistemology: our criteria for evidence to prove or disprove any particular proposition. I conclude that the awareness of these difficulties signifies a certain maturation in our thinking and that the complexity introduced by these obstacles can in time provide the groundwork for a set of formulations that is richer and closer to the complexities and ambiguities of the clinical situation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abraham, K. (1965). Selected Papers of Karl Abraham, trans. D. Bryan & A. Strachey. London: Hogarth Press.
2.
Abrams, S. (1984). Fantasy and reality in the oedipal phase.Psychoanal. Study Child, 39: 83–100.
3.
Blos, P. (1985). Son and Father: Before and Beyond the Oedipus Complex.New York: Free Press.
4.
Blum, H. P. (1977). The Prototype of preoedipal reconstruction.J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 25: 757–786.
5.
Blum, G. S. (1953). Psychoanalytic Theories of Personality.New York: McGraw-Hill.
6.
Cavell, M. A. (1988). Interpretation, psychoanalysis, and the philosophy of mind.J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 36: 859–880.
7.
Dahl, H. (1983). On the definition and measurement of wishes. In Empirical Studies of Psychoanalytic Theories, Vol. 1, ed. J. Masling. Hillsdale, N. J.: Analytic Press, pp. 39–67.
8.
Devereux, G. (1953). Why Oedipus killed Laius: a note on the complementary Oedipus complex.Int. J. Psychoanal, 34: 132–141.
9.
Edmunds, L. (1985a). Freud and the father: Oedipus complex and Oedipus myth.Psychoanal. Contemp. Thought, 8: 87–102.
10.
Edmunds, L. (1985b). Oedipus: The Ancient Legend and Its Later Analogs.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
11.
Edmunds, L. (1988), The body of oedipus.Psychoanal. Rev., 75: 51–66.
12.
Edmunds, L. & Ingber, R. (1977). Psychoanalytical writings on the Oedipus legend: a bibliography.Amer. Imago, 34: 374–386.
13.
Edgcumbe, R. et al. (1976). Some comments on the concept of the negative oedipal phase in girls.Psychoanal. Study Child, 31: 35–61.
14.
Fast, I. (1984). Gender Identity: A differentiation Model.Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.
15.
Fenichel, O. (1945). The Psychoanalytic Theory of the Neuroses.New York: Norton.
16.
Freud, S. (1900). The interpretation of dreams.S. E.4 & 5.
17.
Freud, S. (1905). Three essays on the theory of sexuality.S. E., 7.
18.
Freud, S. (1913). Totem and taboo.S. E., 13.
19.
Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the id.S. E., 19.
20.
Freud, S. (1924). The dissolution of the oedipus complex.S. E., 19.
21.
Freud, S. (1925). Some psychical consequences of the anatomical distinction between the sexes.S. E., 19.
22.
Freud, S. (1931). Female Sexuality,S. E., 21.
23.
Grünbaum, A. (1984). The Foundations of Psychoanalysis.Berkeley, Calif.: Univ. California Press.
24.
Jung, C. G. (1912). “On the Psychology of the Unconscious.” In Collected Works, 7. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton Univ. Press,1953, pp. 3–119.
25.
Hartmann, H., Kris, E. & Loewenstein, R. M. (1964). Some psychoanalytic comments on “culture and personality.” In Papers on Psychoanalytic Psychology. Psychol. Issues, Monogr. 14. New York: Int. Univ. Press, pp. 86–116.
26.
Herdt, G. (1981). Guardians of the Flute: Idioms of Masculinity.New York: McGraw-Hill.
27.
Herdt, G. (1987). The Sambia: Ritual and Gender in New Guinea.New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.
28.
Herdt, G. (1989). Father presence: the case of paternal deprivation and ritual homosexuality reconsidered.Ethos, 18: 326–370.
29.
Herman, J. (1981). Father-Daughter Incest.Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.
30.
Herskovits, M. & Herskovits, F. (1958). Sibling rivalry, the Oedipus complex, and myth.J. Amer. Folklore, 71: 1–15.
31.
Kaufman, I., Peck, A. & Tagiuri, C. (1954). The family constellation and overt incestuous relations between father and daughter.Amer. J. Orthopsychiat., 24: 266–279.
32.
Kohut, H. (1976). Creativeness, charisma, group psychology: reflections on the self-analysis of Freud. In Freud: The Fusion of Science and Humanism. The Intellectual History of Psychoanalysis, ed. J. E. Gedo & G.H. Pollock. Psychol. Issues, Monogr. 34/35. New York: Int. Univ. Press, pp. 379–425.
33.
Kohut, H. (1977). The Restoration of the Self.New York: Int. Univ. Press.
34.
Kohut, H. (1982). Introspection, empathy, and the semi-circle of mental health.Int. J. Psychoanal., 63: 395–408.
35.
Laplanche, J. & Pontalis, J.-B. (1973). The Language of Psychoanalysis.New York: Norton, pp. 282–287.
36.
Lessa, W. A. (1956). Oedipus-type tales in Oceania.J. Amer. Folklore, 69: 63–73.
37.
Lidz, T. & Lidz, R. (1984). Oedipus in the stone age.J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 32: 507–528.
38.
Mandler, G. (1963). Parent and child in the development of the Oedipus complex.J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 136: 227–235.
39.
Mcguire, W., Ed. (1974). The Correspondence between Sigmund Freud and C. G. Jung.Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Univ. Press.
Parens, H., Pollock, L., Stern, J., & Kramer, S. (1976). On the girl's entry into the Oedipus complex.J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 24 (Suppl.):79–107.
42.
Parsons, A. (1964). Is the Oedipus complex universal? The Jones-Malinowski debate revisited and a south Italian 'Nuclear Complex.' In Psychoanal. Study Society, Vol. 3, ed. W. Muensterberger & S. Axelrad. New York: Int. Univ. Press, pp. 278–328.
43.
Pine, F. (1985). Developmental Theory and Clinical Process.New Haven, Conn.: Yale Univ. Press.
44.
Reiss, D. (1981). The Family's Construction of Reality.Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.
45.
Russell, D. E. H. (1986). The Secret Trauma: Incest in the Lives of Girls and Women.New York: Basic Books.
46.
Scharff, D. E. & Scharff, J. S. (1987). Object Relations Family Therapy.Northvale, N.J.: Aronson.
47.
Sears, R. R. (1943). Survey of Objective Studies of Psychoanalytic Concepts. Bulletin 51, Social Science Research Council, New York.
48.
Shapiro, T. (1977). Oedipal distortions in severe character pathologies: developmental and theoretical considerations.Psychoanal. Q., 46: 559–579.
49.
Shapiro, T. (1981). On the quest for the origins of conflict.Psychoanal. Q., 50: 1–21.
50.
Spiro, M. E. (1982). Oedipus in the Trobriands.Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press.
51.
Symposium (1952). Re-evaluation of the role of the Oedipus complex,Int. J. Psychoanal., 33: 335–354.
52.
Weiner, A. B. (1985). Oedipus and ancestors. Review of Oedipus in the Trobriands by M. E. Spiro. Amer. Ethnol, 758–761.
