The Real Person of the Analyst and his Role in the Process of “Psychoanalytic Cure

Abstract

This paper focuses on the real relationship with the analyst in the psychoanalytic situation as an aspect of the therapeutic process that leads to change. The role of free association, clarification, and interpretation of the transference are taken for granted as major activities of the analyst, and the real relationship with him is seen as a complementary but important ingredient for change, In particular, his emotional availability determines the climate of analysis. The concepts of neutrality, anonymity, and abstinence, though of importance as guideposts in the conduct of an analysis, have conceptual limitations that not infrequently bind the analyst in a stance that is not useful for the progress of the analysis. On occasion, confirmation by the analyst of the verily of an experience in the patient's early life facilitates the analytic process. This occurs particularly in situations of early trauma, but at times may include chronically traumatic early life experiences. An important motivating force in analysis is the patient's unconscious wish to find the ideal parent absent in early life experience, a wish that is experienced and ultimately analyzed. This is to be distinguished from a defensive idealized transference. Psychoanalytic developmental psychology contributes to our understanding of how the real person of the analyst, his emotional availability, his responsiveness at particular times, his attitude toward action and progressive change in the patient, affect the therapeutic process that leads to change.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abend, S. & Shane., M. (1988). Psychoanalytic dialogue: Psychoanalysis-to liberate growth or to stimulate growth. Presented at the Fall Meeting of the American Psychoanalytic Association.

Alexander, F. (1958). Unexplored areas in psychoanalytic theory and treatment. In Scope of Psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books, 1961, pp. 319–335.

Arlow., J. A. (1985). The concept of psychic reality and related problems. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 35: 521–536.

Chused. J., F. (1987). Idealization of the analyst by the young adult. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 35: 839–861.

Cooper., A. M. (1987). Changes in psychoanalytic ideas: transference interpretation. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 35: 77–98.

Eissler., K. R. (1953). The effect of the structure of the ego on psychoanalytic technique. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 1: 104–143.

Emde, R. N. (1988). Development terminable and interminable: I. Innate and motivation factors during infancy. Int. J. Psychoanal., 69: 23–42.

Freud, A. (1936). The ego and the mechanisms of defense. Writings, 2. New York: Int. Univ. Press, 1966.

Freud, S. (1909). Notes upon a case of obsessional neurosis. S. E., 10.

10.

Freud, S. (1912). Recommendation to physicians practicing psychoanalysis. S. E., 12.

11.

Freud, S. (1915). Observations on transference love. S. E., 12.

12.

Frosch, J. /a>, (1959). Transference derivatives of the family romance. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 7: 503–522.

13.

Gill, M. M. (1982). Analysis of transference. Vol. I: Theory and Technique. Psychol. Issues, Monogr. 53. New York: Int. Univ. Press.

14.

Greenacre, P. (1975). On reconstruction. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 23: 693–712.

15.

Grunes, M. (1984). The therapeutic object relationship. Psychoanal. Rev., 71: 123–143.

16.

Hoffer, A. (1985). Toward a definition of psychoanalytic neutrality. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 33: 771–795.

17.

Kennan, G. F. (1989). The history of Arnold Toynbee. N.Y. Rev. Books, 36(9)

18.

Laplanche. J. & Pontalis, J. B. (1973). The Language of Psychoanalysis. New York: Norton.

19.

Loewald, H. /a> (1960). On the therapeutic action of psychoanalysis. Int. J. Psychoanal., 41: 16–33.

20.

Meyers, G. E. (1986). William James-His Life and Thought. New Haven, Conn.: Yale Univ. Press.

21.

McLaughlin., J. T. (1988). The analyst's insights. Psychoanal. Q., 57: 370–389.

22.

Michels, R. (1985). Perspectives on the nature of psychic reality. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 35: 515–520.

23.

Modell, A. H. (1976). “The holding environment” and the therapeutic action of psychoanalysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 24: 285–307.

24.

Ornstein, P. Ornstein., A. (1977). On the continuing evolution of psychoanalytic psychotherapy: reflections and predictions. Annual Psychoanal., 5: 329–700.

25.

Panel , (1988). On the nature of psychic reality. R. Roughton, reporter. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 33: 645–659.

26.

Poland, W. S. (1984). On the analyst's neutrality. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 32: 283–299.

27.

Poland, W. S. (1988). Insight and the analytic dyad. Psychoanal. Q., 57: 341–369.

28.

Schafer, R. (1985). The interpretation of psychic reality and related problems. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 33: 537–554.

29.

Shapiro, T. (1984). On neutrality. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 32: 269–282.

30.

Skolnikoff, A. (1988). The silent observer. Presented at the Fall Meeting of the American Psychoanalytic Association.

31.

Stein, M. H. (1981). The unobjectionable part of the transference. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 29: 869–892.

32.

Sterba., R. F. (1944). The formative activity of the analyst. Int. J. Psychoanal, 25: 146–150.

33.

Stone, L. (1961). The Psychoanalytic Situation. New York: Int. Univ. Press.

34.

Thomä, H. & Kächele., H. (1987). Psychoanalytic Practice. New York: Springer Verlag.

35.

Viederman, M. (1976). The influence of the person of the analyst on structural change. Psychoanal. Q., 45: 231–249.

36.

Wallerstein., R. S. (1985). The concept of psychic reality: its meaning and value. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 33: 555–570.

37.

Winnicott, D. W. (1965). The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment. New York: Int. Univ. Press.