As a literary genre, science fiction has been largely ignored by psychoanalysis. Science fiction lends itself well to analytic interpretations since its structure embraces an attitude of “cognitive estrangement” (a term that defines the genre). Science fiction allows for the exploration of new and different permutations of seemingly ageless conflicts and concerns. One of the conflicts science fiction seems to address revolves about our fears regarding our children. These children become the “aliens” among us, as they seek to usurp parental power and authority. This issue is addressed through a study of two of Ray Bradbury' short stories. By manipulating the reader's experience of the “uncanny,” Bradbury succeeds in tapping what appear to be prevalent and potent fears regarding children and, reflexively, the adults who produce them. Mechanisms involved in this play on “alienness” include projective identification of destructive aspects of the self, a resurgence of archaic superego forerunners constituted around primal scene material, and a reawakening of oedipal struggles.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arlow, J. A. (1978). Pyromania and the primal scene: a psychoanalytic comment on the work of Yukio Mishima. Psychoanal. Q., 47:24–51.
2.
Arlow, J. A. (1980). The revenge motive in the primal scene. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 28:519–541.
3.
Bach, S. (1975). Narcissism continuity and the uncanny. Int. J. Psychoanal., 56:77–86.
4.
Barthes, R. (1975). The Pleasure of the Text. New York: Hill & Wang.
5.
Benedek, T. (1959). Parenthood as a developmental phase. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 7:389–417.
6.
Benedek, T. (1970). Parenthood during the life cycle. In Parenthood, ed. E. J. Anthony & T. BenedekBoston: Little, Brown, pp. 185–206.
7.
Berger, A. (1977). Science fiction fans in socioeconomic perspective: factors in the social consciousness of a genre. Sci. Fi. Stud., 4:232–256.
8.
Bettelheim, B. (1977). The Uses of Enchantment: The Meaning and Importance of Fairy Tales. New York: Vintage.
9.
Bixby, J. (1953). It's a good life. In The Science Fiction Hall of Fame, Vol. 1, ed. R. SilverbergNew York: Avon, 1970, pp. 523–542.
10.
Blomfield, O. (1985). Parasitism, projective identification, and the Faustian Bargain. Int. Rev. Psychoanal., 12:299–310.
11.
Bradbury, R. (1943). The small assassin. In The October Country.New York: Bantam, pp. 126–144.
12.
Bradbury, R. (1951). The veldt. In The Illustrated Man.New York: Bantam, pp. 7–19.
13.
Dixon, W. (1986). The child as demon in films. Film Rev., 37:78–83.
14.
Edelheit, H. (1972). Mythopoesis and the primal scene. Psychoanal. Study of Soc., 5:212–233.
15.
Edelheit, H. (1979). Crucifixion fantasies and their relation to the primal scene. Int. J. Psychoanal., 55:193–199.
16.
Erikson, E. H. (1980). On the generational cycle. Int. J. Psychoanal., 61:213–233.
17.
Esman, A. H. (1973). The primal scene: a review and a reconsideration. Psychoanal. Study Child, 28:49–81.
18.
Freud, S. (1915). Repression. S. E., 14.
19.
Freud, S. (1919a). A child is being beaten: a contribution to the study of the origin of sexual perversions. S. E., 17.
20.
Freud, S. (1919b). The uncanny. S. E., 17.
21.
Gold, S. (1985). Frankenstein and other monsters: an examination of the concepts of destructive narcissism and perverse relationships between parts of the self as seen in the gothic novel. Int. Rev. Psychoanal., 12:101–108.
22.
Hienger, J. (1979). The uncanny and science fiction. Sci. Fi. Stud., 6:144–152.
23.
Magistrale, T. (1985). Inherited haunts: Stephen King's terrible children. Extrapolation, 26(1):43–49.
24.
McDougall, J. (1972). Primal scene and sexual perversion. Int. J. Psychoanal., 53:371–384.
25.
Meissner, W. (1974). Correlative aspects of introjective and projective mechanisms. Amer. J. Psychial., 131(2):176–179.
26.
Meissner, W. (1978). The Paranoid Process. New York: Aronson.
27.
Nodelman, P. (1985). Out there in children' science fiction: forward into the past. Sci. Fi. Stud., 12:285–296.
28.
Noy, P. (1982). A revision of the psychoanalytic theory of affect. Ann. Psychoanal., 10:139–185.
29.
Ogden, T. (1979). On projective identification. Int. J. Psychoanal., 60:357–373.
30.
Parens, H. (1975). Discussion of parenthood as a developmental phase. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 23:154–164.
31.
Peto, A. (1969). Terrifying eyes: a visual superego forerunner. Psychoanal. Study Child, 24:197–212.
32.
Peto, A. (1970). To cast away: a vestibular forerunner of the superego. Psychoanal. Study Child, 25:401–416.
33.
Peto, A. (1973). The olfactory forerunner of the superego: its role in normalcy, neurosis, and fetishism. Int. J. Psychoanal., 54:323–330.
34.
Peto, A. (1975). The etiological significance of the primal scene in perversions. Psychoanal. Q., 44:177–190.
35.
Ross, J. (1982). Oedipus revisited: Laius and the “Laius complex.”Psychoanal. Study Child, 37:169–200.
36.
Ross, J. (1986). The darker side of fatherhood: clinical and developmental ramifications of the “Laius motif.”Int. J. Psychoanal. Psychother., 11:117–144.
37.
Schwartz, D. (1984). Psychoanalytic developmental perspectives on parenthood. In Parenthood: A Psychodynamic Perspective, ed. R. Cohen, B. Cohler, & S. WeissmanNew York: Guilford.
38.
Shelley, M. (1816). Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus, ed. M. JosephLondon: Oxford Univ. Press, 1969.
39.
Smith, S. & Kunjukrishnan, R. (1985). Child abuse: perspectives on treatment and research. Psychiat. Clin., 8(4):665–683.
40.
Suvin, D. (1979). Metamorphoses of Science Fiction: On the Poetics and History of a Literary Genre. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.
41.
Wolf, E. (1980). On the developmental line of selfobject relations. In Advances in Self Psychology, ed. A. GoldbergNew York: Int. Univ. Press.
42.
Wolfenstein, M. (1955). The image of the child in contemporary films. In Childhood in Contemporary Cultures, ed. M. Mead & M. WolfensteinChicago: Univ. Chicago Press, pp. 277–295.
43.
Wyndham, J. (1971). The Midwich Cuckoos. New York: Ballantine.
