Freud (1905, 1917, 1937) throughout his lifetime sought empirical scientific confirmation of the validity of his discoveries. In pursuit of this goal, he persistently emphasized the importance of establishing agreement between analytic reconstructions and the results of naturalistic child observation. The same objective lead Lichtenberg (1983), Emde (1981, 1985), and Stern (1985) to produce detailed evaluations of the impact of infant research findings on analytic developmental propositions. The present paper examines the relation among clinical reconstructions from an analysis developed through transference interpretations, empirical observations originating in the analytic patient' daughter' psychotherapy, and the results of empirical infant research that was being concurrently conducted by two of the authors. The findings from the clinical analysis of the mother, the psychotherapy of the daughter, and empirical infant research all converged on the same larger causative factor for the daughter' psychopathology–a type of maternal deprivation. Such a confluence of different sources of evidence, each identified by a different method of investigation, provides one kind of validation for psychoanalytic reconstructions, making it possible to provide that “satisfactory degree of certainty” which Freud (1937) called for in the attempt to integrate the patient' “psychic truth” with “actual” or historical truth.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ainsworth, M. D. S.; Blehar, M. C.; Waters, E. & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of Attachment: A Psychological Study of the Strange Situation. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
2.
Barglow, P., Vaughn, B. & Molitor, N. (1987). Effects of maternal absence due to employment on the quality of infant-mother attachment in a lowrisk sample. Child Devel., 58:945–954.
3.
Block, J. H. (1965). The Childrearing Practices Report. Berkeley: Institute Human Devel., Univ. Calif.
4.
Bonaparte, M. (1945). Notes on the analytic discovery of a primal scene. Psychoanal. Study Child, 1:119–125.
5.
Bornstein, M. H. & Sigman, M. D. (1986). Continuity in mental development from infancJ. Child Devel., 57(2):251–274.
6.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss, Vol. 1. New York: Basic Books.
7.
Carey, W. B. & McDevitt, S. (1978). Revision of the infant temperament questionnaire. Pediat., 61:735–739.
8.
Cattell, R. B. & Scheier, I. H. (1959). IPAT Anxiety Scale. Champaign, Ill.: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
9.
Cohler, B., Weiss, J. & Grünebaum, H. (1970). Child care attitudes and emotional disturbance among mothers of young children. Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 82:3–47.
10.
Edelson, M. (1988). Psychoanalysis: A Theory in Crisis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Emde, R. N. (1981). Changing models of infancy and the nature of early development: remodeling the foundation. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 29:178–220.
12.
Emde, R. N. (1985). From adolescence to midlife: remodeling the structure of adult development. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 33(Suppl.):59–112.
13.
Farber, E. A. & Egeland, B. (1982). Developmental consequences of out-of-home care for infants in a low income population. In Day Care, ed. E. Zigler & E. Gordon, Boston: Auburn, pp. 102–125.
14.
Fisher, S. & Greenberg, R. P. (1977). The Scientific Credibility of Freud' Theories and Therapies. New York: Basic Books.
15.
Flumerfelt, A. (1962). On reconstruction. Bull. Phila. Assn. Psychoanal., 12:53–68.
16.
Freud, S. (1905). Three essays on the theory of sexualit J. S. E., 7.
17.
Freud, S. (1917). General theory of the neuroses. S. E., 16.
18.
Freud, S. (1937). Constructions in analysis. S. E., 23.
19.
Gough, H. (1975). Manual for the California Psychological Inventory. Palo Alto, Calif: Consulting Psychologists Press.
20.
Greenspan, S. I. & Lieberman, H. F. (1980). Infants, mothers and their interaction: a quantitative clinical approach to developmental assessment. In The Course of Life: Contributions Toward Understanding Personality Development, Vol. I, ed. S. I. Greenspan & G. H. Pollock. Palo Alto, Calif: Consulting Psychologists Press, pp. 780–786.
21.
Grünbaum, A. (1984). The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press.
22.
Harrison, S. I. (1970). Psychoanalysis, our science?J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 18:125–149.
23.
Herzog, J. (1980). Sleep disturbance and father hunger in 18- to 28-month-old boys: the Erlkönig syndrome. Psychoanal. Study Child, 35:219–236.
24.
Hock, E. (1984). The transition to day care: effects of maternal separation anxiety on infant adjustment. In Quality Variation in Day Care: Implications for Child Development, New York: Prager, pp. 183–205.
25.
Ireton, H. R. & Thwing, E. G. (1972). The MCDI in the psychiatric-developmental evaluation of the preschool child. Child Psychiat. & Human Devel., 3:102–114.
26.
Joffe, L. S.; Vaughn, B. E.; Barglow, P. & Benveniste, R. (1985). Bio-behavioral antecedents in the development of infant-mother attachment. In Psychobiology of Infant Attachment, ed. M. Reite & T. Field. Orlando, Fla.: Academic Press, pp. 323–349.
27.
Kris, E. (1950). Notes on the development and on some current, problems of psychoanalytic child psychologJ. Psychoanal. Study Child, 5:24–46.
28.
Levy, K. (1960). Simultaneous analysis of a mother and her adolescent daughter. Psychoanal. Study Child, 15:378–394.
29.
Lichtenberg, J. D. (1983). Psychoanalysis and Infant Research. Hillsdale, N.J.: Analytic Press.
30.
Mahler, M. S. (1981). Aggression in the service of separation-individuation: case study of a mother-daughter relationship. Psychoanal. Q., 50:625–638.
31.
Main, M. & Goldwyn, R. (in press). Predicting rejection of her infant from mother's representation of her own experiences. Int. J. Child Abuse & Neglect.
32.
Main, M. & Weston, D. R. (1982). Avoidance of the attachment figure in infancy: descriptions and interpretations. In The Place of Attachment in Human Behavior, ed. C. M. Parkes & J. Stevenson-Hinde. New York: Basic Books, pp. 31–59.
33.
Main, M. & Stadtman. J. (1981). Infant response to rejection of physical contact by the mother. J. Amer. Acad. Child Psychial., 20:292–307.
34.
Tomasini, L. & Tolan, W. (1979). Differences among mothers of infants judged to differ in securitJ. Devel. Psychol., 15:472–473.
35.
Scuwaber, E. A. (1986). Reconstruction and perceptual experience: further thoughts on psychoanalytic listening. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 34:911–932.
36.
Serota, H. (1964). Movies of early childhood: correlative developmental data in the psychoanalysis of adults. Science, 143:1195.
37.
Shapiro, T. & Stern, D. (1980). Psychoanalytic perspectives on the first year of life–the establishment of the object in an affective field. In The Course of Life: Contributions Toward Understanding Personality Development, Vol. I, ed S. I. Greenspan & G. H. Pollock. Palo Alto, Calif.: Consulting Psychologists Press, pp. 113–128.
38.
Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L. & Lushene, R. (1969). Stale-trail Anxiety Inventory (STAI) Test Manual Form X. Palo Alto, Calif.: Consulting Psychologists Press.
39.
Spitz, R. A. (1950). Relevancy of direct infant observation. Psychoanal. Study Child, 5:66–73.
40.
Sroufe, L. A. (1983). Infant-caregiver attachment and patterns of adaption in preschool: the roots of maladaption and competence. Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology, ed. M. Perlmutter. 16:41–83. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
41.
Stern, D. (1985). The Interpersonal World of the Infant. New York: Basic Books.
42.
Vaughn, B., Deane. K. E. & Waters. E. (1985). The impact of out-of-home care on child-mother attachment quality: another look at some enduring questions. In Growing Points of Attachment Theoty, ed. I. Bretherton & E. Waters. Monogr. SRCD, 50(209): 110–135.
43.
Winnicott, D. W. (1956). Primary maternal preoccupation. In Collected Papers.New York: Basic Books, 1958.
44.
Winnicott, D. W. (1962). The theory of the parent-infant relationship. Int. J. Psychoanal., 43:238–239.
