How Dreams Are Told: Secondary Revision—The Critic,The Editor,and The Plagiarist

Abstract

Secondary revision is a highly provocative concept arising out of Freud's attempts to explain the construction of dreams, but it remains relatively ill-defined. It includes three related, yet by no means identical aspects of the process by which the dream acquires its more or less final form during the experiencing, the remembering, and the telling. It represents one of the most interesting hypotheses dealing with the fluid world between sleeping and waking, a field which still presents us with a host of unanswered questions.

Secondary revision not only reflects the higher levels of the dreamer's mental functioning superimposed on his biological substructure, but it also operates as a sensitive indicator of the cultural factors which have helped mold his personality. These factors include both the subculture of the analytic situation and the impact of society in the larger sense. I make reference to individual dreamers in analysis and to the world of dreams recorded in the past from our own and other cultures.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arlow, J. A. (1961). Ego psychology and the study of mythology. J. Amer. Psyckoanal. Assn., 9:373–393.

Arlow, J. A. , & Brenner (1964). Psychoanalytic Concepts and the Structural Theory. New York: Int. Univ. Press.

Artemidorus , (2nd C., A. D.). Oneirocritica, ed. R. J. White . Park Ridge, N.J.: Noyes, 1975.

Bunyan, J. (1678). The Pilgrim's Progress, ed. R. Sharrock . New York: Penguin Books, 1965.

Freud, S. (1887-1902). The Origins of Psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books, 1954.

Freud, S. (1900). The interpretation of dreams. S. E., 4 & 5.

Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the id. S. E., 19.

Griffin, J. (1986). Greek myth and Hesiod. In Oxford Dictionary of the Classical World, ed. J. Boardman , J. Griffin , & O. Murray . New York: Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 78–98.

Homer (c. 700 B. C.). The Odyssey of Homer, trans. R. Lattimore . New York: Harper & Row.

10.

Isakower, O. (1954). Spoken words in dreams. Psychoanal. Q., 23: 1–6.

11.

Kris E. (1943). Some problems of war propaganda. In Selected Papers. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1975, pp. 443–450.

12.

O'Flaherty, W. (1984). Dreams, Illusions and Other Realities. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press.

13.

Oxford English Dictionary (1971). New York: Oxford Univ. Press.

14.

Panel (1984). The clinical use of psychoanalysis. O. Renik, reporter. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 32:157–162.

15.

Pepys, S. (1665). The Diary of Samuel Pepys, ed. R. Latham & W. Matthews . London: G. Bell & Sons, 1972.

16.

Plato (c. 400 B. C.). The Republic, trans. A. Bloom . Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1968.

17.

Silber, A. (1973). Secondary revision, secondary elaboration and ego synthesis. Int. J. Psychoanal., 54:161–168.

18.

Sophocles (c. 400 B.C.) Oedipus the King, trans. D. Grene . Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1942

19.

Stein, M. H. (1965). States of consciousness in the psychoanalytic situation, including a note on the traumatic dream. In Drives, Affects, Behavior, ed. M. Schur . New York: Int. Univ. Press.

20.

Stein, M. H. (1977). A psychoanalytic view of mental health: Samuel Pepys and his diary. Psychoanal Q., 46:82–115.

21.

Stein, M. H. (1981). The unobjectionable part of the transference. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 29:968–992.

22.

Stein, M. H. (1984). Rational versus anagogic interpretation: Xenophon's dream and others. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 32:529–556.

23.

Waelder, R. (1930). The principle of multiple function: observations on overdetermination. In Psychoanalysis: Observation, Theory, Application, ed. S. A. Gutman . New York: Int. Univ. Press, 1968, pp. 68–83.