To cope with the obscure, complexly overdetermined, and unstable nature of unconscious meanings, Freud developed a pluralistic methodology that employs a wide variety of interpretive strategies and procedures. Conversely, Kohut proposed a radically abbreviated interpretive approach based on the single, subjective method of empathy. This report reevaluates Kohut's monistic interpretive methodology: (1) The principal features of Kohut's interpretive method are reviewed and evaluated. (2) Case material and interpretations from Kohut's final book are used to compare his unidimensional approach with the pluralistic methodology of traditional interpretation. (3) The epistemologic liabilities of Kohut's interpretive method are delineated and discussed. (4) Methodologically more appropriate strategies for improving clinical interpretation are presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abraham, I. L. (1986). Diagnostic discrepancy and clinical inference: a social-cognitive analysis. Genet., Soc., Gen. Psychol. Monogr., 112:41–102.
2.
Arlow, J. A. (1979). Metaphor and the psychoanalytic situation. Psychoanal. Q., 48:363–385.
3.
Arlow, J. A. (1981). Theories of pathogenesis. Psychoanal. Q., 50:488–514.
4.
Bakan, D. (1967). On Method. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
Barthes, R. (1977). Image, Music, Text. New York: Hill & Wang.
6.
Blum, H. P. (1982). Theories of the self and psychoanalytic concepts: discussion. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 30:959–978.
7.
Buie, D. H. (1981). Empathy: its nature and limitations. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 29:281–308.
8.
Cheshire, N. M. (1975). The Nature of Psychodynamic Interpretation. London: Wylie & Sons.
9.
Davis, W. A. (1978). The Act of Interpretation: A Critique of Literary Reason. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press.
10.
Diesing, P. (1971). Patterns of Discovery in the Social Sciences. Chicago: Aldine.
11.
Dyrud, J. (1983). Narcissus and nemesis. Psychiat., 46:106–112.
12.
Eagle, M. N. (1982). Review of Object and Self: A Developmental Approach, ed. S. Tuttman et al. Rev. Psychoanal. Bks., 1:445–451.
13.
Eagle, M. N. (1984). Recent Developments in Psychoanalysis: A Critical Evaluation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
14.
Eissler, K. R. (1963). Freud and the psychoanalysis of history. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 11:675–703.
15.
Ellis, A. (1950). An introduction to the principles of scientific psychoanalysis. Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 41:147–212.
16.
Fiske, D. W., & Shweder, R. A. (1986). Metatheory in Social Science: Pluralities and Subjectivities. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press.
17.
Feyerabend, P. (1981). Problems of Empiricism: Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2. Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge Univ. Press.
18.
Freedman, N. & Steingart, I. (1975). Kinesic internalization and language construction. Psychoanal, Contemp. Sci., 4:355–404.
19.
Freud, S. (1900). The interpretation of dreams. S. E., 4 & 5.
20.
Freud, S. (1901). The psychopathology of everyday life. S. E., 6.
21.
Freud, S. (1905). Jokes and their relation to the unconscious. S. E., 8.
22.
Freud, S. (1911). The handling of dream-interpretation in psychoanalysis. S. E., 12.
23.
Freud, S. (1912a). The dynamics of transference. S. E., 12.
24.
Freud, S. (1912b). Recommendations to physicians practising psychoanalysis. S. E., 12.
25.
Freud, S. (1913). On beginning the treatment (further recommendations on the technique of psychoanalysis, I). S. E., 12.
26.
Freud, S. (1914). Remembering, repeating and working through (further recommendations on the technique of psychoanalysis, II). S. E., 12.
27.
Freud, S. (1915). Observations on transference love (further recommendations on the technique of psychoanalysis, III). S. E., 12.
28.
Freud, S. (1915–1917). Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. S. E., 15 & 16.
29.
Freud, S. (1923). Remarks on the theory and practice of dream-interpretation. S. E., 19.
30.
Freud, S. (1925). Some additional notes on dream-interpretation as a whole. S. E., 19.
31.
Freud, S. (1933). New introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. S. E., 22.
32.
Freud, S. (1937). Constructions in analysis. S. E., 23.
33.
Gedo, J. E. (1979). Beyond Interpretation. New York: Int. Univ. Press.
34.
Gedo, J. E. (1980). Reflections on some current controversies in psychoanalysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 28:363–383.
35.
Goldberg, A. (1981). Meaning and objects. In Object and Self: A Developmental Approach, ed. S. Tuttman et al. New York: Int. Univ. Press, pp. 129–148.
36.
Goldberg, A. (1983). On the scientific status of empathy. Annual Psychoanal., 11:155–169.
37.
Goldberg, A. (1985). The definition and role of interpretation. In Progress in Self Psychology, Vol. 1, ed. A. Goldberg. New York: Guilford, pp. 62–65.
38.
Gombrich, E. H. (1969). The evidence of images. In Interpretation: Theory and Practice, ed. C. S. Singleton. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, pp. 35–104.
39.
Hirsch, E. D., Jr. (1967). Validity in Interpretation. New Haven, Conn.: Yale Univ. Press.
40.
Jacobs, T. J. (1973). Posture, gesture, and movement in the analyst: cues to interpretation and countertransference. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 21:77–92.
41.
Jaffe, D. S. (1986). Empathy, counteridentification, countertransference: a review with some personal perspectives on the “analytic instrument.”Psychoanal. Q., 55:215–243.
42.
James, W. (1890). Principles of Psychology, vols. 1 & 2. New York: Holt.
43.
Jelalian, E. & Miller, A. G. (1984). The perseverance of beliefs: conceptual perspectives and research developments. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol., 2:25–56.
44.
Jones, E. E. (1986). Interpreting interpersonal behavior: the effects of expectancies. Science, 234:41–46.
45.
Jones, E. E. & Nisbett, R. E. (1971). The Actor and the Observer: Divergent Perceptions of the Causes of Behavior. New York: General Learning Press.
46.
Kaplan, A. (1964). The Conduct of Inquiry. New York: Crowell.
47.
Klauber, J. (1968). On the dual use of historical and scientific method in psychoanalysis. Int. J. Psychoanal., 49:80–88.
48.
Klein, D. B. (1970). A History of Scientific Psychology—Its Origins and Philosophical Backgrounds. New York: Basic Books.
49.
Kohut, H. (1959). Introspection, empathy, and psychoanalysis: an examination of the relationship between mode of observation and theory. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 7:459–483.
50.
Kohut, H. (1968). The psychoanalytic treatment of narcissistic personality disorders: outline of a systematic approach. Psychoanal. Study Child, 23:86–113.
51.
Kohut, H. (1971). The Analysis of the Self. New York: Int. Univ. Press.
52.
Kohut, H. (1977). The Restoration of the Self. New York: Int. Univ. Press.
53.
Kohut, H. (1982). Introspection, empathy, and the semicircle of mental health. Int. J. Psychoanal., 63:395–407.
54.
Kohut, H. (1984). How Does Analysis Cure?Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press.
55.
Leavy, S. A. (1973). Psychoanalytic interpretation. Psychoanal. Study Child, 28:305–330.
56.
Levine, D. N. (1986). The forms and functions of social knowledge. In Metatheory in Social Science: Pluralities and Subjectivities, ed. D. W. Fiske & R. A. Shweder. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, pp. 271–283.
57.
Levine, F. J. (1977). Review of Kohut, H., The Restoration of the Self. J. Phila. Assn. Psychoanal., 4:238–247.
58.
Levine, F. J. (1979). On the clinical application of Kohut's psychology of the self: comments on some recently published case studies. J. Phila. Assn. Psychoanal., 6:1–19.
59.
Levy, S. T. (1985). Empathy and psychoanalytic technique. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 33:353–378.
60.
Loewald, H. (1973). Review of Kohut, H., The Analysis of the Self. Psychoanal. Q., 42:441–451.
61.
London, N. J. (1985). An appraisal of self psychology. Int. J. Psychoanal., 66:95–107.
62.
Maltsberger, J. T. & Buie, D. H. (1974). Countertransference hate in the treatment of suicidal patients. Arch. Gen. Psychiat., 30:625–633.
63.
Maltsberger, J. T. & Buie, D. H. (1980). The devices of suicide: revenge, riddance and rebirth. Int. Rev. Psychoanal., 7:61–72.
64.
Meehl, P. E. (1983). Subjectivity in psychoanalytic inference: the nagging persistence of Wilhelm Fliess's Achensee question. In Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 10, ed. J. Earman. Minneapolis: Univ. Minnesota Press, pp. 349–411.
65.
Meissner, W. W. (1971). Freud's methodology. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 19:265–309.
66.
Moore, B. E. (1981). Review of Goldberg, A., Ed., The Psychology of the Self: A Casebook. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 29:249–252.
67.
Olinick, S. L. (1980). The Psychotherapeutic Instrument. New York: Aronson.
68.
Olinick, S. L.Poland, W. S.Grigg, K. A., et al (1973). The psychoanalytic work ego: process and interpretation. Int. J. Psychoanal., 54:143–151.
69.
Ornstein, P. H. & Ornstein, A. (1980). Formulating interpretations in clinical psychoanalysis. Int. J. Psychoanal., 61:203–211.
70.
Ornstein, P. H. & Ornstein, A. (1985). Clinical understanding and explaining: the empathic vantage point. In Progress in Self Psychology, vol. 1, ed. A. Goldberg. New York: Guilford, pp. 43–61.
71.
Panel (1983). Metapsychology: its cultural and scientific roots. L. Chattah, reporter. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 31:689–698.
72.
Paniagua, C. (1985). A methodological approach to surface material. Int. Rev. Psychoanal., 12:311–325.
73.
Pelikan, J. J. (1968). Exegesis and hermeneutics, biblical. Encyc. Britannica, 8:949–954.
74.
Peterfreund, E. (1983). The Process of Psychoanalytic Therapy: Models and Strategies. Hillsdale, N.J.: Analytic Press.
75.
Post, S. L. (1980). Origins, elements, and functions of therapeutic empathy. Int. J. Psychoanal., 61:227–293.
76.
Rapaport, D. (1944). The scientific methodology of psychoanalysis. In The Collected Papers of David Rapaport, ed. M. M. Gill. New York: Basic Books, 1967, pp. 165–220.
77.
Reed, G. S. (1987). Rules of clinical understanding in classical psychoanalysis and in self-psychology: a comparison. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 35:421–446.
78.
Ricoeur, P. (1970). Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation. New Haven, Conn.: Yale Univ. Press.
79.
Rothstein, A. (1980). Toward a critique of the psychology of the self. Psychoanal. Q., 49:423–455.
80.
Rubinstein, B. B. (1983). Person, organism and self: their worlds and their psychoanalytically relevant relationships. Psychoanal. Q., 52:158–160.
81.
Rubovits-Seitz, P. F. D. (1979). Review of Goldberg, A., Ed., The Psychology of the Self: A Casebook. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 167:454–456.
82.
Rubovits-Seitz, P. F. D. (1986a). Clinical interpretation, hermeneutics, and the problem of validation. Psychoanal. Contemp. Thought, 9:3–42.
83.
Rubovits-Seitz, P. F. D. (1986b). Review of Kohut, H., How Does Analysis Cure?J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 174:432.
84.
Schwaber, E. A. (1987). Review of P. Stepansky and A. Goldberg, Eds., Kohut's Legacy: Contributions of Self Psychology. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 35:743–750.
85.
Schwartz, L. (1978). Review of H. Kohut, The Restoration of the Self Psychoanal. Q., 47:436–443.
86.
Seitz, P. F. D. (1966). The consensus problem in psychoanalytic research. In Methods of Research in Psychotherapy, ed. L. Gottschalk & A. Auerbach. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, pp. 209–225.
87.
Shapiro, T. (1974). The development and distortions of empathy. Psychoanal. Q., 43:4–25.
88.
Shapiro, T. (1981). Empathy: A critical reevaluation. Psychoanal. Inq., 1:423–448.
89.
Shengold, L. (1981). Insight as metaphor. Psychoanal. Study Child, 36:289–306.
90.
Slap, J. W. & Levine, F. J. (1978). On hybrid concepts in psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Q., 67:499–523.
91.
Snyder, C. R., Shenkel, R.J. & Schmidt, A. (1976). Effects of role perspective and client psychiatric history on locus of problems. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol., 44:467–472.
92.
Spence, D. P. (1981). Review of A. Goldberg, Ed., The Psychology of the Self: A Casebook. Contemp. Psychol., 26:57–58.
93.
Spence, D. P. (1982). Narrative Truth and Historical Truth: Meaning and Interpretation in Psychoanalysis. New York: Norton.
94.
Spence, D. P. (1984). Perils and pitfalls of free-floating attention. Contemp. Psychoanal., 20:37–59.
95.
Stein, M. H. (1979). Review of H. Kohut, Restoration of the Self. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 27:665–680.
96.
Stoller, R. J. (1979). Sexual Excitement: Dynamics of Erotic Life. New York: Pantheon.
97.
Teller, V. & Dahl, H. (1986). The microstructure of free association. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 34:763–798.
98.
Treurniet, N. (1980). On the relation between the concepts of self and ego in Kohut's psychology of the self. Int. J. Psychoanal., 61:325–333.
99.
Treurniet, N. (1983). Psychoanalysis and self-psychology: a metapsychological essay with a clinical illustration. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 31:59–100.
100.
Voth, H. M. (1970). The analysis of metaphor. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 18:599–621.
101.
Wallerstein, R. S. (1985). How does self psychology differ in practice?Int. J. Psychoanal., 66:391–404.
102.
Wallerstein, R. S. (1986). Psychoanalysis as a science: a response to the new challenges. Psychoanal. Q., 55:414–451.
