Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Dynamic conflict among feelings of entitlement, defectiveness, and deprivation is discussed from the perspective of superego defense against dangerously aggressive (and sexual) wishes. These negative feelings and negative self-images are exploited so as to appease the superego in the face of oneapos;s hostile aggression: that one is justified, that there are extenuating circumstances for oneapos;s hatred and de-structiveness. The “oral” clamor of deprivation and entitlement, together with dependency, submissiveness, and defensive uncertainty, serve a screening function for hostile aggressive wishes, from any developmental level. Typically, attitudes of entitlement are contradictory, unclear, and wavering, because of conflict between differing ego ideal images, and conflict between superego, and ego and id, about the sadistic extractiveness in these altitudes. Altitudes of entitlement are contributed to by past trauma, deprivation, abuse, leasing overstimulation coupled with neglect, or alternating indulgence and deprivation, as well as identification with certain parental attitudes-exploitation and extractiveness-and denial of the need for the superego to assess reality accurately.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Coen, S. J. (1985). Perversion as a solution to intrapsychic conflict. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 33(Suppl.): 17–57.

Coen, S. J. (1986). The sense of defect. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 34:47–67.

Freud, S. (1914). On narcissism: an introduction. S. E., 14.

Freud, S. (1915). Observations on transference love (further recommendations on the technique of psycho-analysis, III). S. E., 12.

Freud, S. (1916). Some character-types met with in psycho-analytic work. S. E., 14.

Furer, M. (1972). The history of the superego concept: a review of the literature. In Moral Values and the Superego Concept in Psychoanalysis, ed. S. C. Post New York: Int. Univ. Press, pp. 11–62.

Glover, E. (1964). Aggression and sado-masochism. In: Pathology and Treatment of Sexual Deviation, ed. I. Rosen. London: Oxford, pp. 146--162.

Jacobson, E. (1959). The “exceptions”: an elaboration of Freudapos;s character study. Psychoanal. Study Child, 14:135–154.

Kernberg, O. F. (1984). Clinical aspects of severe superego pathology. In Severe Personality Disorders: Psychotherapeutic Strategies. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, pp. 275–289.

10.

Lax, R. (1975). Some comments on the narcissistic aspects of self-righteousness: defensive and structural considerations. Int. I. Psychoanal., 56:283–292.

11.

Levin, S. (1970). On the psychoanalysis of attitudes of entitlement. Bull. Phila. Assn. Psychoanal., 20:1–10.

12.

Murray, J. (1964). Narcissism and the ego ideal. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 12:477–511.

13.

Nunberg, H. (1932). Principles of Psychoanalysis. New York: Int. Univ. Press, 1955.

14.

Rapaport, D. (1957). A theoretical analysis of the superego concept. In The Collected Papers of David Rapaport, ed. M. M. Gill New York: Basic Books, 1967, pp. 685–709.

15.

Rothstein, A. (1977). The ego attitude of entitlement. Int. J. Psychoanal., 4:409–417.

16.

Sandler, J. (1960). On the concept of superego. Psychoanal. Study Child, 15:128–162.

17.

Sandler, J. Holder, A. & Meers, D. (1963). The ego ideal and the ideal self. Psychoanal. Study Child, 18:139–158.

18.

Schafer, R. (1960). The loving and beloved superego in Freudapos;s structural theory. Psychoanal. Study Child, 15:163–188.

19.

Segel, N. F. (1969). Repetition compulsion, acting out, and identification with the doer. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 17:474–488.

20.

Shapiro, D. (1981). Autonomy and Rigid Character. New York: Basic Books.

Superego Aspects of Entitlement (In Rigid Characters)

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References