The author's purpose is threefold: first, to demonstrate the redundancy in the events of the complex life of a patient as told to a psychoanalyst; second, to show two novel ways to represent those events simply; and third, to suggest that the field of psychoanalysis, under assault from philosophers of science and hermeneuticists alike for either not being or for trying to be a science, can in principle be reclaimed for science. It can be done by abandoning a widely held belief that human behavior is simply too complex, too malleable, too rooted in ineffable experience to permit of systematic scientific capture.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bordin, E. (1966), Free association: conceptual and clinical aspects. Int. J. Psychoanal., 42:9–20.
2.
Dahl, H. (1978). A new psychoanalytic model of motivation: emotions as appetites and messages. Psychoanal. Contemp. Thought, 1:373–408.
3.
Dahl, H. (1985). Frames of Mind. Presentation for Panel: Templates of the Mind. Spring Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Division 39.
4.
Edelson, M. (1978). What is the psychoanalyst talking about? In Psychoanalysis and Language, ed. J. Smith.New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, pp. 99–170.
5.
Freud, A. (1936). The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defense. Writings, 2. New York: Int. Univ. Press, 1966.
6.
Freud, S. (1910). Five lectures on psycho-analysis. S. E., 11.
7.
Freud, S. (1913). On beginning the treatment. S. E., 12.
8.
Freud, S. (1914). Remembering, repeating and working-through. S. E., 12.
9.
Freud, S. (1924). A short account of psycho-analysis. S. E., 19.
10.
Freud, S. (1925). An autobiographical study. S. E., 20.
11.
Gedo, J. (1979). Theories of object relations: a metapsychological assessment. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 27:361–373.
12.
Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In The Psychology of Computer Vision, ed. P. Winston.New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 211–277.
13.
Panel (1986). Clinical aspects of language, Martin Weich, reporter. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 34(3).
14.
Pollard-Gott, L., Mccloskey, M. & Todres, A. (1979). Subjective story structure. Discourse Processes, 2:251–281.
15.
Ricoeur, P. (1977). The question of proof in Freud's psychoanalytic writings. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 25:835–871.
16.
Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In Cognition and Categorization, ed. E. Rosch & B. Lloyd. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum Assoc, pp. 27–48.
17.
Rubinstein, B. (1974). On the role of classificatory processes in mental functioning: aspects of a psychoanalytic theoretical model. Psychoanal. Contemp. Sci., 3:101–185.
18.
Rubinstein, B. (1975). On the clinical psychoanalytic theory and its role in the inference and confirmation of particular clinical hypotheses. Psychoanal. Contemp. Set., 4:3–57.
19.
Schafer, R. (1980). Narration in the psychoanalytic dialogue. Critical Inquiry, 7:29–53.
20.
Sherwood, M. (1969). The Logic of Explanation in Psychoanalysis.New York: Academic Press.
21.
Simon, H. A. (1981). The Sciences of the Artificial, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
22.
Spence, D. (1982). Narrative Truth and Historical Truth.New York: Norton.
23.
Teller, V. & Dahl, H. (1981). The framework for a model of psychoanalytic inference. Proc. Seventh Int. Joint Conference Artificial Intelligence, 1:394–400.
