For nearly six decades after its publication in 1905, Freud's remarkable case of Dora remained untouched by critical comment. However, beginning in the early 1970's, an abundance of articles began to appear, which focused exclusively on the Dora case. The present paper reviews the literature of this so-called “Dora revival” in order to explain the historical and theoretical reasons leading to this extraordinary burst of research. Above all, two vital developments in the psychoanalytic discipline created the climate that fostered the Dora revival. First, there was a revolutionary change in attitude toward the phenomenon of countertransference: in contrast to the classical view of countertransference as a disruptive interference in treatment, analysts increasingly regarded countertransference as a pervasive and natural process, which could be potentially utilized to enhance understanding of the patient's unconscious conflicts and defenses. Second, there was enormous and rapid growth of a comprehensive psychoanalytic theory of adolescence and its treatment. Thus, based on a more favorable attitude toward countertransference, and a much improved understanding of the unique problems of adolescence, psychoanalysts could reexamine and better understand the decisive events that contributed to Freud's abortive analytic treatment of Dora.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adatto, C. (1958). Ego reintegration observed in analysis of late adolescents. Int. J. Psychoanal., 39:172–177.
2.
Adatto, C. (1966). On the metamorphosis from adolescence into adulthood. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 14:485–509.
3.
Aichhorn, A. (1925). Wayward Youth.New York: Viking Press, 1948.
4.
Begel, D. (1982). Three examples of countertransference in Freud's case of Dora. Amer. J. Psychoanal, 42:163–169.
5.
Bernfeld, S. (1923). A typical form of male puberty. Imago, 9:169–188.
6.
Bernfeld, S. (1938). Types of adolescence. Psychoanal. Q., 7.
7.
Bernstein, I. (1980). Integrative summary: On the re-viewing of the Dora case. In Kanzer & Glenn (1980), pp. 23--47.
8.
Blos, P. (1951). The contribution of psychoanalysis to the treatment of adolescents. In Psychoanalysis and Social Work, ed. M. Heiman, New York: Int. Univ. Press.
9.
Blos, P. (1954). Prolonged adolescence. Amer. J. Orlhopsychial.24:733–742.
10.
Blos, P. (1962). On Adolescence: A Psychoanalytic Interpretation.New York: Free Press.
11.
Blos, P. (1972). The epigenesis of the adult neurosis. Psychoanal. Study Child, 27:106–135.
12.
Blos, P. (1979). The Adolescent Passage.New York: Int. Univ. Press.
13.
Breuer, J. & Freud, S. (1895). Studies on Hysteria. S. E., 2.
14.
Cohen, M. (1952). Countertransference and anxiety. Psychiat., 15:231–243.
15.
David, C. (1974). A discussion of the paper by René Major on “the revolution of hysteria.”Int. J. Psychoanal., 55:393–395.
16.
Decker, H. (1981). Freud and Dora: constraints on medical progress. J. Soc. Hist., 14:445–464.
17.
Decker, H. (1982). The choice of a name: “Dora” and Freud's relationship with Breuer. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 30:113–136.
18.
Deutsch, F. (1957). A footnote to Freud's “Fragment of an analysis of a case of hysteria.”Psychoanal. Q., 26:159–167.
19.
Eissler, K. R. (1958). Notes on the problems of technique in the psychoanalytic treatment of adolescents. Psychoanal. Study Child, 13:223–254.
20.
Ellenberger, H. (1970). The Discovery of the Unconscious.New York: Basic Books.
21.
Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and Society.New York: Norton.
22.
Erikson, E. H. (1962). Reality and actuality. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 10:451–474.
23.
Fenichel, O. (1936). Problems of Psychoanalytic Technique.Albany: Psychoanalytic Quarterly.
24.
Fraiberg, S. (1955). Some considerations in the introduction to therapy in puberty. Psychoanal. Study Child, 10:264–286.
25.
Freud, A. (1936). The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defense. Writings, 2. New York: Int. Univ. Press, 1966.
26.
Freud, A. (1946). The Psycho-Analytical Treatment of Children.New York: Int. Univ. Press, 1959.
27.
Freud, A. (1958). Adolescence. Psychoanal. Study Child, 13:255–278.
28.
Freud, A. (1966). A short history of child analysis. Psychoanal. Study Child, 21:7–14.
29.
Freud, S. (1901). The psychopathology of everyday life. S. E., 6.
30.
Freud, S. (1905a). Fragment of an analysis of a case of hysteria. S. E., 7.
31.
Freud, S. (1905b). Three essays on the theory of sexuality. S. E., 7.
32.
Freud, S. (1910). The future prospects of psychoanalytic therapy. S. E., 11.
33.
Geleerd, E. (1957). Some aspects of psychoanalytic technique in adolescence. Psychoanal. Study Child, 12:263–283.
34.
Geleerd, E. (1961). Some aspects of ego vicissitudes in adolescence. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 9:394–405.
35.
Gitelson, M. (1948). Character synthesis: the psychotherapeutic problems in adolescence. Amer. J. Orthopsychiat., 18:422–431.
36.
Glenn, J. (1980a). Freud's adolescent patients: Katherina, Dora, and “the homosexual woman.” In Kanzer & Glenn (1980), pp. 23--47.
37.
Glenn, J. (1980b). Notes on psychoanalytic concepts and style in Freud's case histories. In Kanzer & Glenn (1980), pp. 3--19.
38.
Greenberg, J. & Mitchell, S. (1983). Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory.Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
39.
Hare-Mustin, R. (1983). An appraisal of the relationship between women and psychotherapy: 80 years after the case of Dora. Amer. Psychol., 38:593–601.
40.
Hartmann, H., Kris, E. & Lowenstein, R. (1946). Comments on the formation of psychic structure. Psychoanal. Study Child, 2:11–38.
41.
Hug-Hellmuth, H. von (1919). A Young Girl's Diary.New York: Seltzer, 1921.
42.
Jacoby, R. (1983). The Repression of Psychoanalysis.New York: Basic Books.
43.
Jones, E. (1922). Some problems of adolescence. In Papers on Psychoanalysis.Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1948.
44.
Jones, E. (1953). The Life and Work of Sigmund Freud.New York: Basic Books.
45.
Kanzer, M. (1980). Dora's imagery: the flight from a burning house. In Kanzer & Glenn (1980), pp. 72--82.
46.
Kanzer, M. & Glenn, J., Eds. (1980). Freud and His Patients.New York: Aronson.
47.
Klein, M. (1932). The technique of analysis in puberty. In The Psychoanalysis of Children.New York: Norton, pp. 122–141.
48.
Krohn, A. & Krohn, J. (1982). The nature of the Oedipus complex in the Dora case. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 30:555–578.
49.
Lampl-de Groot, J. (1960). On adolescence. Psychoanal. Study Child, 15:95–103.
50.
Langs, R. (1976). The misalliance dimension in Freud's case histories: I. The case of Dora. Int. J. Psychoanal. Psychother.5:301–317; also in Kanzer & Glenn (1980), pp. 58--71.
51.
Lewin, K. (1973). Dora revisited. Psychoanal. Rev.60:519–532.
52.
Lindon, J. (1969). A psychoanalytic view of the family: a study of family member interactions. Psychoanal. Forum, 3:11–65.
53.
Lorand, S. (1964). Treatment of adolescents. In Adolescents: Psychoanalytic Approach to Problems and Therapy, ed. S. Lorand & H. Schneer. New York: Harper & Row.
54.
Major, R. (1974). The revolution of hysteria. Int. J. Psychoanal, 55:385–392.
55.
Marty, P., Fain, M., de M'Uzan, M., & David, C. (1968). Dora's case and the psychosomatic point of view. Rev. Franc. Psychanal., 22:679–714.
56.
Marcus, S. (1974). Freud and Dora: story, history, case history. Partisan Rev., 41:89–108; also in Representations: Essays on Literature and Society. New York: Random House, 1975, pp. 247--310.
57.
Menninger, K. (1958). Theory of Psychoanalytic Technique.New York: Basic Books.
58.
Moscovitz, J. (1973). Aspects of homosexuality in “Dora.”Rev. Franç. Psy chanal, 27:359–372.
59.
Muslin, N. & Gill, M. (1978). Transference in the Dora case. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 26:311–328.
60.
Noshpitz, J. (1957). Opening phase in the psychotherapy of adolescents with character disorders. Bull. Menninger Clin., 21:153–164.
61.
Orr, D. (1954). Transference and countertransference: a historical review. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 2:621–670.
62.
Possick, S. (1984). Termination in the Dora case. J. Amer. Acad. Psychoanal., 12:1–11.
63.
Reich, A. (1951). On countertransference. Int. J. Psychoanal., 32:25–31.
64.
Rieff, P. (1971). Introduction. In Dora: an Analysis of a Case of Hysteria, S. Freud. New York: Collier, pp. 7–20.
65.
Rogow, A. (1978). A further footnote to Freud's “Fragment of an Analysis of a Case of Hysteria.”J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 26:331–356.
66.
Sand, R. (1983). Confirmation in the Dora case. Int. Rev. Psychoanal., 10:333–358.
67.
Scharfman, M. (1980). Further reflections on Dora. In Kanzer & Glenn (1980), pp. 48–57.
68.
Schimmel, I. (1973). Dream and transference in “Dora.”Rev. Franç. Psychanal.27:313–321.
69.
Seidenberg, R. & Papathosmopoulos, E. (1962). Daughters who tend their fathers. Psychoanal. Study Society, 2:135–160.
70.
Slipp, S. (1977). Interpersonal factors in hysteria: Freud's seduction theory and the case of Dora,J. Amer. Acad. Psychoanal., 5:359–376.
71.
Solnit, A. (1959). The vicissitudes of ego development in adolescence. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 7:523–536.
72.
Spence, D. (1986). When interpretation masquerades as explanation. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 34 (1).
73.
Spiegel, L. (1951). A review of contributions to a psychoanalytic theory of adolescence. Psychoanal. Study Child, 6:375–393.
74.
Spiegel, L. (1957). Comments on the psychoanalytic psychology of adolescents. Psychoanal. Study Child, 13:296–308.
75.
Spiegel, R. (1977). Freud and the women in his world. J. Amer. Acad. Psychoanal., 5:377–402.
76.
Spitz, R. (1956). Countertransference: comments on its varying role in the analytic situation. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 4:256–265.
77.
Sullivan, H. S. (1940). Conceptions of modern psychiatry. Psychiat., 3:1–117.
78.
Sullivan, H. S. (1949). The theory of anxiety and the nature of psychotherapy. Psychiat., 12:3–12.
79.
Tower, L. (1956). Countertransference. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 4:224–255.
80.
Viderman, S. (1974). Interpretation in the analytic space. Int. Rev. Psychoanal., 1:467–480.
