Burstein, E., Coyne, L., Kernberg, D., Voth, H. (in press). The quantitative study of the psychotherapy research project; psychotherapy outcome. Bull. Menninger Clinic.
2.
Feldman, D. (1968), Results of psychoanalysis in clinic case assignments. This Journal, 16:274–300.
3.
Freud, A., Nagera, H., & Freud, E. (1965), Mctapsychological assessment of the adult personality: the adult profile. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 20:9–41. New York: International Universities Press.
4.
Hamburg, D., Bibring, G.Fisher, D., Stanton, A., Wallerstein, R., Weinstock, H., & Haggard, E. (1967), Report of ad hoc committee of central fact-gathering data of the American Psychoanalytic Association. This Journal, 15:841–861.
5.
Holt, R. R., Luborsky, L., Morrow, W. R., Rapaport, D., & Escalona, S. K. (1958), Personality Patterns of Psychiatrists, Vol. I. New York: Basic Books, p. 356.
6.
Joseph, E., ed. (1967), Indications for Psychoanalysis. [Monograph Series of the Kris Study Group of the New York Psychoanalytic Institute, Monograph II]. New York: International Universities Press.
7.
Klein, H. (1960), A study of changes occurring in patients during and after psychoanalytic treatment. In: Current Approaches to Psychoanalysis, ed. P. Hock & J. Zubin. New York: Grune & Stratton.
8.
Knapp, P., Levin, S., McCarter, R., Wermer, H., & Zetzel, E. (1960), Suitability for psychoanalysis: a review of one hundred supervised analytic cases. Psychoanal. Quart., 29:459–477.
9.
Levin, S. (1960), Problems in the evaluation of patients for psychoanalysis. Bull. Phila. Assn. for Psychoanal., 10:86–95.
10.
Luborsky, L. & Spence, D. (1971), Quantitative research on psychoanalytic therapy. In: Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavioral Change: An Empirical Analysis, ed. A. E. Beigin & S. L. Garfield. New York: John Wiley.
