Hypnosis As A Method for Investigating Unconscious Thought Processes: A Review of Research

1. Bevan, W. Subliminal stimulation: a pervasive problem for psychology. Psychol. Bull., 61:81–99, 1964.

2. Breuer, J. & Freud, S. Studies on hysteria (1893–1895). Standard Edition, 2. London: Hogarth Press, 1955.

3. Brenman, M. Dreams and hypnosis. Psychoanal. Quart., 18:455–465, 1949.

4. Deckert, G. H. & West, L. J. The problem of hypnotizability: a review. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn., 11:205–235, 1963.

5. Gill, M. M. & Brenman, M. Hypnosis and Related States. New York: International Universities Press, 1961.

6. Farber, L. H. & Fisher, C. An experimental approach to dream psychology through the use of hypnosis. Psychoanal Quart., 12:202–216, 1943.

7. Fisher, C. Introduction. In: Preconscious Stimulation in Dreams, Associations, and Images [Psychological Issues, Monogr. 7]. New York: International Universities Press, 1960, pp. 1–40.

8. Freud, S. Charcot (1893). Standard Edition, 3:9–23. London: Hogarth Press, 1962.

9. Freud, S. On the psychical mechanism of hysterical phenomena: a lecture (1893). Standard Edition, 3:27–39. London: Hogarth Press, 1962.

10. Freud, S. The interpretation of dreams (1900). Standard Edition, 4 & 5. London: Hogarth Press, 1963.

11. Freud, S. Notes upon a case Of obsessional neurosis (1909). Standard Edition, 10:153–318. London: Hogarth Press, 1955.

12. Freud, S. The unconscious (1915). Standard Edition, 14:159–215. London: Hogarth Press, 1957.

13. Freud, S. Some elementary lessons in psycho-analysis (1940 [1938]). Standard Edition, 23:279–286. London: Hogarth Press, 1964.

14. Hilgard, E. R. , et al. The distribution of susceptibility to hypnosis in a student population: a study using the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale. Psychol. Monogr. 75, No. 8 (whole no. 512), 1961.

15. Huston, P. E. , Shakow, D. , & Erickson, M. H. A study of hypnotically induced complexes by means of the Luria technique. J. Gen. Psychol. 2:65–97, 1934.

16. Klein, D. B. The experimental production of dreams during hypnosis. Univ. Texas Bull., 3009:1–71, 1930.

17. Luria, A. R. The Nature of Human Conflicts. New York: Liveright, 1932.

18. Nachmansohn, M. Concerning experimentally produced dreams (1925). In: Organization and Pathology of Thought, ed. D. Rapaport . New York: Columbia University Press, 1951, pp. 257–287.

19. Orne, M. T. The nature of hypnosis: artifact and essence. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 58:277–299, 1959.

20. Orne, M. T. On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: with particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. Amer. Psychol., 17:776–783, 1962.

21. Pötzl, O. The relationships between experimentally induced dream images and indirect vision (1917). In: Preconscious Stimulation in Dreams, Associations, and Images [Psychological Issues, Monogr. 7]. New York: International Universities Press, 1980, pp. 41–120.

22. Rapaport, D. , ed. Organization and Pathology of Thought. New York: Columbia University Press, 1951.

23. Roffenstein, G. Experiments on symbolization in dreams (1924). In: Organization and Pathology of Thought, ed. D. Rapaport . New York: Columbia University Press, 1951, pp. 249–256.

24. Rosenthal, R. On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: the experimenter's hypothesis as unintended determinant of experimental results. Amer. Scientist, 51:268–283, 1963.

25. Schrötter, K. Experimental dreams (1911). In: Organization and Pathology of Thought, ed. D. Rapaport , New York: Columbia University Press, 1951, pp. 234–248.

26. Shevrin, H. & Luborsky, L. The rebus technique: a method for studying primary-process transformations of briefly exposed pictures. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 133:479–488, 1961.

27. Shor, R. E. Three dimensions of hypnotic depth. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn., 10:23–38, 1962.

28. Stross, L. & Shevrin, H. Thought organization in hypnosis and the waking state: the effects of subliminal stimulation in different states of consciousness. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 147:272–288, 1968.