Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 1967-04
An Experimental Approach to the Study of Dynamic Propositions In Psychoanalysis The Relationship between the Aggressive Drive and Ego Regression—Initial Studies
1. Allers, R., & Teler, J.On the utilization of unnoticed impressions in associations (1924). In: Preconscious Stimulation in Dreams, Associations, and Images: Classical Studies [Psychol. Issues, 7:121–150]. New York: International Universities Press, 1960.
2.
2. Arlow, J. A., & Brenner, C.Psychoanalytic Concepts and the Structural Theory.New York: International Universities Press, 1964.
3.
3. Bak, R. C.The schizophrenic defence against aggression.Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 35:129–134, 1954.
4.
4. Benjamin, J. D.Methodological considerations in the validation and elaboration of psychoanalytical personality theory.Amer. J. Orthopsychiat., 20:139–156, 1950.
5.
5. Brown, F.An exploratory study of dynamic factors in the content of the Rorschach protocol.J. Proj. Tech., 17:251–279, 1953.
6.
6. Dement, W., & Fisher, C.Studies in dream deprivation and satiation. Abstract in: Psychoanal. Quart., 29:671, 1960.
7.
7. Dement, W., & Fisher, C.Studies in dream deprivation and satiation: an experimental demonstration of the necessity for dreaming. Abstract in: Bull. Phila. Assn. Psychoanal, 10:30, 1960.
8.
8. Fisher, C.Dreams and perception.This Journal, 2:389–445, 1954.
9.
9. Fisher, C.Dreams, images, and perception: a study of unconscious-preconscious relationships.This Journal, 4:5–48, 1956.
10.
10. Fisher, C.A study of the preliminary stages of the construction of dreams and images.This Journal, 5:5–60, 1957.
11.
11. Fisher, C.The relationship between experimentally induced dream images and indirect vision (Introduction). In: Preconscious Stimulation in Dreams, Associations, and Images: Classical Studies [Psychol. Issues, 7:1–40]. New York: International Universities Press, 1960.
12.
12. Fisher, C., & Paul, I. H.The effect of subliminal visual stimulation on images and dreams: a validation study.This Journal, 7:35–83, 1959.
13.
13. Freud, S.The neuro-psychoses of defence (1894). Standard Edition, 3:43–68. London: Hogarth Press, 1962.
14.
14. Freud, S.Further remarks on the neuro-psychoses of defence (1896). Standard Edition, 3:159–185. London: Hogarth Press, 1962.
15.
15. Freud, S.Psycho-analytic notes on an autobiographical account of a case of paranoia (1911). Standard Edition, 12:3–82. London: Hogarth Press, 1958.
17. Freud, S.Beyond the pleasure principle (1920). Standard Edition, 18:7–64. London: Hogarth Press, 1955.
18.
18. Freud, S.Neurosis and psychosis (1924). Standard Edition, 19:149–153. London: Hogarth Press, 1961.
19.
19. Freud, S.The loss of reality in neurosis and psychosis (1924). Standard Edition, 19:183–187. London: Hogarth Press, 1961.
20.
20. Frosch, J.In Panel: An examination of nosology according to psychoanalytic concepts, rep. N. Ross.This Journal, 8:544–548, 1960.
21.
21. Gardner, R. W.Cognitive control principles and perceptual behavior.Bull. Menninger Clin., 23:241–248, 1959.
22.
22. Gardner, R. W., Jackson, D. N., & Messick, S. J.Personality Organizations in Cognitive Controls and Intellectual Abilities [Psychol. Issues, Monogr. 8]. New York: International Universities Press, 1960.
23.
23. Gill, M. M.Topography and Systems in Psychoanalytic Theory [Psychol. Issues, Monogr. 10], New York: International Universities Press, 1963.
24.
24. Goldberger, L., & Holt, R. R.Experimental interference with reality contact (perceptual isolation): method and group results.J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 127:99–112, 1958.
25.
25. Goldberger, L., & Holt, R. R.Experimental interference with reality contact (perceptual isolation): individual differences. In: Sensory Deprivation Isolation, ed. P. Solomon. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1961.
26.
26. Hartmann, H.Contribution to the metapsychology of schizophrenia. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 8:177–197. New York: International Universities Press, 1953.
27.
27. Hartmann, H.Comments on the scientific aspects of psychoanalysis. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 13:127–146. New York: International Universities Press, 1958.
28.
28. Hartmann, H.Psychoanalysis as a scientific theory. In: Psychoanalysis: Scientific Method and Philosophy, ed. S. Hook. New York: New York University Press, 1959, pp. 3–37.
29.
29. Hartmann, H., & Kris, E.The genetic approach in psychoanalysis. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 1:11–30. New York: International Universities Press, 1945.
30.
30. Hartmann, H., Kris, E., & Loewenstein, R. M.Notes on the theory of aggression. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 3/4:9–36. New York: International Universities Press, 1949.
31.
31. Holt, R. R.Manual for the scoring of primary process manifestations in Rorschach responses: Draft 8. New York University, Research Center for Mental Health, 1960 (Dittoed).
32.
32. Jacobson, E.Denial and repression.This Journal, 5:61–92, 1957.
33.
33. Keiser, S.Disturbance of ego functions of speech and abstract thinking.This Journal, 10:50–73, 1962.
34.
34. Klein, G. S.Adaptive properties of sensory functioning: some postulates and hypotheses.Bull. Menninger Clin., 13:16–23, 1949.
35.
35. Klein, G. S.Cognitive control and motivation. In: Assessment of Human Motives, ed. G. Lindzey. New York: Rinehart, 1958.
36.
36. Kris, E.The nature of psychoanalytic propositions and their validation. In: Freedom and Experience, ed. S. Hook and M. R. Konvitz. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1947, pp. 239–259.
37.
37. Kris, E.Problems in clinical research (Round Table).Amer. J. Orthopsychiat., 17:210–214, 1947.
38.
38. Kubie, L. S.Problems in clinical research (Round Table).Amer. J. Orthopsychiat., 17:196–203, 1947.
39.
39. Kubie, L. S.Problems and techniques of psychoanalytic validation and progress. In: Psychoanalysis as Science, ed. E. Pumpian-Mindlin. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1952, pp. 46–124.
40.
40. Malamud, W.Dream analysis: its application in therapy and research in nervous and mental disease.Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 31:356–372, 1934.
41.
41. Malamud, W., & Linder, F. E.Dreams and their relationship to recent impressions.Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 25:1081–1099, 1931.
42.
42. Paul, I. H.Studies in Remembering: The Reproduction of Connected and Extended Verbal Material [Psychol. Issues, Monogr. 2]. New York: International Universities Press, 1959.
43.
43. Pine, F.Incidental versus focal presentation of drive related stimuli.J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol, 62:482–490, 1961.
44.
44. Pine, F.The bearing of psychoanalytic theory on selected issues in research on marginal stimuli.J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 138:205–222, 1964.
45.
45. Pine F. & Holt, R. R.Creativity and primary process: a study of adaptive regression.J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 61:370–379, 1960.
46.
46. Pötzl, O.The relationship between experimentally induced dream images and indirect vision (1917). In: Preconscious Stimulation in Dreams, Associations, and Images: Classical Studies [Psychol. Issues, 7:41–120]. New York: International Universities Press, 1960.
47.
47. Powers, W. T., & Hamlin, R. M.Relationships between diagnostic category and deviant verbalizations on the Rorschach.J. Consult. Psychol., 14:120–124, 1955.
48.
48. Rapaport, D.Diagnostic Psychological Testing, 2 Vols. Chicago: Year Book Publishers, 1946.
49.
49. Rapaport, D.The Structure of Psychoanalytic Theory: A Systematizing Attempt [Psychol. Issues, Monogr. 6]. New York: International Universities Press, 1960.
51. Schwartz, F., & Rouse, R. O.The Activation and Recovery of Associations [Psychol. Issues, Monogr. 9]. New York: International Universities Press, 1961.
52.
52. Silverman, L. H.On the relationship between aggressive imagery and thought disturbance in Rorschach responses.J. Proj. Tech., 27:336–344, 1963.
53.
53. Silverman, L. H.Ego disturbance in T.A.T. stories as a function of aggression-arousing stimulus properties.J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 138:248–254, 1964.
54.
54. Silverman, L. H.Regression in the service of the ego: a case study.J. Proj. Tech., 29:232–244, 1965.
55.
55. Silverman, L. H.A study of the effects of subliminally presented aggressive stimuli on the production of pathological thinking in a non-psychiatric population.J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 141:443–455, 1965.
56.
56. Silverman, L. H.A technique for the study of psychodynamic relationships: the effects of subliminally presented aggressive stimuli on the production of pathological thinking in a schizophrenic population.J. Consult. Psychol., 30:103–111, 1966.
57.
57. Silverman, L. H., & Goldweber, A.A further study of the effects of subliminal aggressive stimulation on thinking. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. (in press).
58.
58. Silverman, L. H., & Silverman, D. K.A clinical-experimental approach to the study of subliminal stimulation: the effects of a drive-related stimulus upon Rorschach responses.J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 69:158–172, 1964.
59.
59. Silverman, L. H., & Silverman, S. E.The effects of subliminally presented drive stimuli on the cognitive functioning of schizophrenics. J. Proj. Tech. (in press).
60.
60. Silverman, S. E.The effects of subliminally induced drive derivatives on ego functioning in schizophrenia. New York University doctoral dissertation, in preparation.
61.
61. Waelder, R.The structure of paranoid ideas.Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 32:167–177, 1951.
62.
62. Watkins, J., & Staffacher, J.An index of pathological thinking.J. Proj. Tech., 16:276–286, 1962.