1. Ackerman, N.Selected problems in supervised analysis. Psychiatry, 16:283–290, 1953.
2.
2. Balint, M.On the psycho-analytic training system. Int. J. Psychoanal, 29:163–173, 1948.
3.
3. Balint, M.Analytic training and training analysis. Int. J. Psychoanal., 35:157–162, 1954.
4.
4. Benedek, T.Countertransference in the training analyst. Bull. Menninger Clin., 18:12–16, 1954.
5.
5. Bernfeld, S. Unpublished paper. See Ekstein (8).
6.
6. Blitzsten, L. & Fleming, J.What is supervisory analysis?Bull. Menninger Clin., 17:117–129, 1953.
7.
7. Ekstein, R.Panel report: The teaching of psychoanalytic technique. This Journal, 8:167–174, 1960.
8.
8. Ekstein, R.A historical survey of the teaching of psychoanalytic technique. This Journal, 8:500–516, 1960.
9.
9. Ekstein, R. & Wallerstein, R.The Teaching and Learning of Psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books, 1958.
10.
10. Emch, M.The social context of supervision. Int. J. Psychoanal., 36:298–306, 1955.
11.
11. Fleming, J.The role of supervision in psychiatric training. Bull. Menninger Clin., 17:157, 1953.
12.
12. Gitelson, M.Problems of psychoanalytic training. Psychoanal. Quart., 17:198–211, 1948.
13.
13. Greenson, R.Empathy and its vicissitudes. Int. J. Psychoanal., 41:418–424, 1960.
14.
14. Grotjahn, M.Present trends in psychoanalytic training. In Twenty Years of Psychoanalysis, ed. F. Alexander & H. Ross. New York: Norton, 1953.
15.
15. Grotjahn, M.Problems and techniques of supervision. Psychiatry, 18:9–15, 1955.
16.
16. Hartmann, H.From the section: Events in the psychoanalytic world. Bull. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 7:203, 1951.
17.
17. Hora, T.Contribution to the phenomenology of the supervisory process. Amer. J. Psychother., 11:769–773, 1957.
18.
18. Reiser, S.Panel report: The technique of supervised analysis. This Journal, 4:539–549, 1956.
19.
19. Knapp, P. H., Levin, S., McCarter, R., Wermer, H., & Zetzel, E.Suitability for psychoanalysis: a review of 100 supervised analytic cases. Psychoanal. Quart., 29:459–477, 1960.
20.
20. Kovacs, V.Training and control analysis. Int. J. Psychoanal., 17:346–354, 1936.
21.
21. Kubie, L.Research into the process of supervision in psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Quart., 27:226–236, 1958.
22.
22. Lampl-de Groot, J.Problems of psycho-analytic training. Int. J. Psychoanal., 35:184–187, 1954.
23.
23. Lewin, B. D. & Ross, H.Psychoanalytic Education in the United States. New York: Norton, 1960.
24.
24. Levin, S.A study of fees for control analysis. Bull. Phila. Assn. Psychoanal., 8:69–82, 1958.
25.
25. Meerloo, J.Some psychological problems in supervision of therapists. Amer. J. Psychother., 6:467–470, 1952.
26.
26. Peltz, W.Transference in psychoanalytic case supervision. Bull. Phila. Assn. Psychoanal, 6:49, 1956.
27.
27. Rainbow Report (Report of the Survey Steering Committee to the Board on Professional Standards). American Psychoanalytic Association, 1955.
28.
28. Report of the International Training Commission: The Four Countries Conference. Int. J. Psychoanal, 18:364–372, 1937.
29.
29. Rosen, V.Review of: The Initial Psychiatric Interview and the Principles of Psychotherapy: Some Recent Contributions. This Journal, 6:154–167, 1958.
30.
30. Sachs, H.Observations of a training analyst. Psychoanal. Quart., 16:157–168, 1947.
31.
31. Searles, H.The informational value of the supervisor's emotional experiences. Psychiatry, 18:135, 1955.
32.
32. Sloane, P.Panel report: The technique of supervised analysis. This Journal, 5:539–547, 1957.
33.
33. Wagner, F.Supervision of psychotherapy. Amer. J. Psychother., 11:759–768, 1957.
