The authors’ basic thesis is that training in critical thinking and inclusion of research findings in psychoanalytic education are essential for the vitality and future viability of psychoanalysis. Despite the calls of significant psychoanalytic voices over many years for such changes, these steps have not been taken to any significant extent in most psychoanalytic institutes. The authors recognize that much research is not directly relevant to clinical work or psychoanalytic theorizing. The authors discuss the kind of research that is likely to be relevant and describe steps that can be taken by psychoanalytic institutes to integrate critical thinking and research findings into psychoanalytic training and education.
AronL.StarrK. (2013). A psychotherapy for the people: Toward a progressive psychoanalysis. Routledge.
2.
BarberJ. P.MuranJ. C.McCarthyK. S.KeefeR. J. (2013). Research on psychodynamic therapies. In LambertM. J. (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th ed., pp. 443–494). Wiley.
3.
BlattS. J. (1992). The differential effect of psychotherapy and psychoanalysis with anaclitic and introjective patients: The Menninger Psychotherapy Research Project revisited. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 40, 691–724. doi:10.1177/000306519204000303
4.
BowlbyJ. (1979). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. Tavistock
5.
BrennerC. (1976). Psychoanalytic technique and psychic conflict. International Universities Press.
6.
ClarkK. B.ClarkM. P. (1947). Racial identification and preference in Negro children. In NewcombT. M.HartleyE. L. (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 169–178). Holt, Rinehart.
7.
BuschF. N.MilrodB. L. (2010). The ongoing struggle for psychoanalytic research: Some steps forward. Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 24(4), 306–314.
8.
CooperA. M. (2008). American psychoanalysis today: A plurality of orthodoxies. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry, 36(2), 235–263.
9.
Crits-ChristophP.GibbonsM.B.C. (2021). Psychotherapy process-outcome research: Advances in understanding causal connections. In BarkhamM.LutzW.CastonguayL. (Eds.), Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (7th ed., pp. 263–295). John Wiley.
10.
Crits-ChristophP.GibbonsM.B.C.MukherjeeD. (2013). Psychotherapy process-outcome research. In LambertM. J. (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th ed., pp. 298–340). John Wiley.
11.
CurtisR. C. (Ed.). (2017). Psychoanalytic case studies from an interpersonal/relational perspective. Routledge.
12.
DajaniK. G. (2017). The ego habitus: An examinationof the role culture plays in structuring the ego. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalsis, 14(4), 273–281.
13.
DajaniK. (2022). The social unconscious: Then and now. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 19(2), 179–186.
14.
DodgeK. A.PriceJ. M.BacharowskiJ. A.NewmanJ. P. (1990). Hostile attributional biases in severely aggressive adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99(4), 385–392.
15.
DodgeK. A.PetitG. S.BatesJ. E.ValenteE. (1995). Social information processing patterns partially mediate the effect of early abuse on later conduct problems. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 632–643.
16.
EagleM. N. (1997). Contributions of Erik Erikson. Psychoanalytic Review, 84(3), 337–347.
17.
EagleM. N. (2018a). Core concepts in clinical psychoanalysis: Clinical, research evidence, and conceptual critiques. Routledge.
18.
EagleM. N (2018b). Core concepts in contemporary psychoanalysis: Clinical, research evidence, and conceptual critiques. Routledge.
19.
EagleM. N. (2021). The role of critical thinking and research in psychoanalytic education. In Leuzinger-BohleberM.SolmsM.ArnoldS. E. (Eds.), Outcome research and the future of psychoanalysis: Clinicians and researchers in dialogue (pp. 249–259). Routledge.
20.
EagleM.N. (2024). Subjective experience: Its fate in psycholoogy, psychoanalysis and philosophy of mind. Routledge
21.
EagleM.N. (2025). Psychoanalytic conceptions of agoraphobia. Psychoanalytic Review, 112(2), 199–222.
22.
EagleM.N.WolitzkyD.L. (2011). Systematic empirical research versus clinical case studies: A valid antagonism?Journal of the american Psychoanalytic Association, 59, 791–818
23.
EdelsonM. (1985). The hermeneutic turn and the case study in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 8, 567–614.
24.
EmmelkampP. M. (2013). Behavior therapy in adults. In LambertM. J. (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th ed., pp. 495–538). Wiley.
25.
EriksonE. H. (1950). Childhood and society. Norton.
26.
FalkenströmF. (2022). Data analytic advances that bridge the scientist-practitioner gap. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 29(3), 585–590.
27.
FalkenströmF.FinkelS.SandellR.RubelJ. A.HolmqvistR. (2017). Dynamic models of individual change in psychotherapy process research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 85(6), 537–549.
28.
FalkenströmF.SolomonovN.RubelJ. (2020). Using time lagged panel data analysis to study mechanisms of change in psychotherapy research: Methodological recommendations. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 20(3), 435–441.
29.
FishmanD. B. (2013). The pragmatic case study method for creating rigorous and systematic practitioner friendly research. Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy, 9(4), 403–425.
30.
FreudS. (1957). The history of the psychoanalytic movement. In StracheyJ. (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 14 (1914–1916): On the history of the psycho-analytic movement, papers on meta-psychology and other works (pp. 3–66). Hogarth. (Original work published 1914)
31.
FrieR. (2014). Cultural psychoanalysis: Psychoanalytic anthropology and the interpersonal tradition. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 50, 371–394. doi:10.1080/00107530.2014.895929
32.
GedoJ. (1989). Letter to the editor. Review of Psychoanalytic Books, 41(3), 511–515.
33.
GerberA.Knopf (2015). An empirically based psychoanalytic curriculum. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 35, 115–123.
34.
GilmanS.L. (2009). Psychoanalysis in the university: The clinical dimension. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 90(5), 1103–1105.
35.
GloverE. (1952). Research methods in psychoanalysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 33, 403–409.
36.
GreenbergJ. R.MitchellS. A. (1983). Object relations in psychoanalytic theory. Harvard University Press.
37.
HoffmanI. Z. (2009). Doublethinking our way to “scientific” legitimacy: The desiccation of human experience. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 57, 1043–1069.
38.
HoglendP.AmloS.BogwaldA.SorbyeK. P.JaastedO.HyerdahlG. (2006). Analysis of the patient-therapist relationship in dynamic psychotherapy: An experimental study of transference interpretations. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164(10), 97–120.
39.
HopperE. (1996). The social unconscious in clinical work. Group, 20(1), 7–42.
40.
HorneyK. (1939). New ways in psychoanalysis. Norton.
41.
KardinerA.OveseyL. (1951). The mark of oppression: A psychological study of the American Negro. Norton.
42.
KarenR. (1994). Becoming attached: First relationships and how they shape our capacity to love. Oxford University Press
43.
KazdinA. E. (2007). Mediators and mechanisms of change in psychotherapy research. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3, 1–27.
44.
KazdinA. (2016). Methodological issues and strategies in clinical research (4th ed.). American Psychological Association.
45.
KazdinA.E. (2021). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
46.
KernbergO. (2016). A proposal for innovation in psychoanalytic education. Division/Review, 15, 13–16.
47.
KernbergO. F. (2000). A concerned critique of psychoanalytic education. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 81(1), 97–120.
48.
KernbergO. F. (2012). Suicide prevention in psychoanalytic institutes and societies. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 60, 709–719.
49.
KlumpnerG.H.FrankA. (1991). On methods of reporting clinical material. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 39(2), 537–551.
LeichsenringF.SteinerC.RabungS.IoannidisJ. P. (2022). The efficacy of psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies for mental disorders in adults: An umbrella review and meta-analytic evaluation of recent meta-analyses. World Psychiatry, 21, 133–145.
52.
McManusR.RoulstonK.ZomerenM.FiedlerK. (2023). Psychology is a property of persons, not averages or distributions: Confronting the group-to-person generalizability problem in experimental psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 6(3)
53.
MidgelyM. (2006). The “inseparable bond between cure and research”: Clinical case study as a method of psychoanalytic inquiry. Journal of Child Psychotherapy, 32(2), 122–147.
54.
PhilipsB.FalkenströmF. (2021). What research evidence is valid for psychotherapy research?Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, Article 625380.
55.
PretskyJ. (2021). Teaching empirical research in psychodynamic psychotherapy: How to make research really matter. In Leuzinger-BohleberM.SolmsS.ArnoldS. E. (Eds.), Outcome research and the future of psychoanalysis: Clinicians and researchers in dialogue (pp. 238–248). Routledge.
56.
ReichenbachH. (1938). Experience and prediction: An analysis of the foundation and the structure of knowledge. University of Chicago Press.
57.
RiviereJ. (1927). Symposium on child-analysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 8, 370–377.
58.
RosenzweigS. (1997). Letters by Freud on experimental psychodynamics. American Psychologist, 52(5), 571.
59.
ShedlerJ. (2010). The efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 65(2), 93–109.
SolmsM. (2013). The conscious id. Neuropsychoanalysis, 15(1), 5–19.
62.
SpenceD. P. (1994). The rhetorical voice of psychoanalysis: Displacement of evidence by theory. Harvard University Press.
63.
WachtelP. L. (1994). Cyclical processes in psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 51–54.
64.
WachtelP. L. (2003). Making room for the disavowed: Reclaiming the self in psychotherapy. Guilford.
65.
WachtelP. L. (2008). Relational theory and the practice of psychotherapy. Guilford.
66.
WachtelP. L. (2014). Cyclical psychodynamics and the contextual self: The inner world, the intimate world, and the world of culture and society. Routledge.
67.
WachtelP.L. (2023). Making room for the disavowed: Reclaiming the self in psychotherapy. Guilford
68.
WampoldB. E. (2015). How important are the common factors in psychotherapy? An update. World Psychiatry, 14(3), 270–277.
69.
WampoldB. E.ImelZ. E. (2015). The great psychotherapy debate: The evidence for what makes psychotherapy work. Routledge.
70.
WampoldB. E.UlvenesP. G. (2019). Integration of common factors and specific ingredients. In NorcrossJ. C.GoldfriedM. R. (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy integration (pp. 69–87). Oxford University Press.
71.
WestenD.NovotnyC. M.Thompson-BrennerH. (2004). The empirical status of empirically supported psychotherapies: Assumptions, findings, and reporting in controlled clinical trials. Psychological Bulletin, 130(4), 631–663.
