Utilizing the work of philosopher Karen Barad, this paper explores the intraplays between gender, antigender discourse, and the climate crisis. In the midst of a world that is ecologically breaking down, gendered embodiment is a domain in which, for some, the dismay, despair, and reconfigured possibilities of our current world gathers. I use clinical examples to suggest that the disruptive elements constitutive of embodiment, as well as its potential porosity with the more-than-human world, make gender a possible site of resistance and ethical response-ability in the context of the climate crisis. Gender can become a powerful medium for an experience of a circulation between the density of the familiar and an alterity that is inside/outside. At the same time, as our usual coordinates are lost, the immersive panic that ensues also creates attempts to reinforce a threatened heteropatriarchal world, as is seen in Far Right ideologies. Attacks on trans children frequently center on defending “the natural” and protecting these children from “mutilation” and the “contagion” of gender ideology. The paper explores the way these claims project destructiveness and perversely distort several terrors entangled with the climate crisis—about “nature,” violence, and permeability.
AlaimoS. (2010). Bodily natures: Science, environment, and the material self. University of Indiana Press.
2.
BaradK. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
3.
BaradK. (2015). Transmaterialities: Trans/matter/realities and queer political imaginings. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 21(2–3), 387–422.
BodnarS. (2008). Wasted and bombed: Clinical enactments of a changing relationship to the earth. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 18, 484–512.
6.
BodnarS. (2024). The fierce urgency of now: The case for including the environmental field in clinical work. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 34(6), 795–811.
7.
BrickmanC. (2003). Aboriginal populations in the mind: Race and primitivity in psychoanalysis. Columbia University Press.
8.
ButlerJ. (2024). Who’s afraid of gender?Farrar, Straus.
9.
CloughP. (2023). What is the social?Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 33, 140–156.
10.
CloughP. (2024). Psychoanalysis as “studio practice.”Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 34, 190–199.
11.
CruikshankJ. (2005). Do glaciers listen? Local knowledge, colonial encounters, and social imagination. University of British Columbia Press.
12.
DajaniK. (2017). The ego’s habitus: An examination of the role culture plays in structuring the ego. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 14, 273–281.
13.
DanowskiD.Viveiros de CastroE. (2017). The ends of the world. Polity.
DickinsonE. (1976). The complete poems of Emily Dickinson. Little, Brown.
16.
DurbanJ. (2017). Home, homelessness and nowhere-ness in early infancy. Journal of Child Psychotherapy, 43, 175–191.
17.
DurbanJ. (2022). Osmotic-diffuse anxieties and “hard” ideologies: The attack against sanity as a home. Psyche-Zeitschrift für Psychoanalyse, 76, 377– 401.
18.
EliseD. (2017). Moving from within the maternal: The choreography of analytic eroticism. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 65, 33–60.
19.
FiorellaK. (2023). Thinking in a marrow bone: Embodiment in Vajrayana Buddhism and psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 71, 277–309.
20.
FolkJ. (Director). (2022). What is a woman?The Daily Wire.
FreudS. (1955). Totem and taboo. In StracheyJ. (Ed., Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 13 (1913–1914): Totem and taboo and other works (pp. 1–164). Hogarth. (Original work published 1913)
23.
FreudS. (1964). Moses and monotheism. In StracheyJ. (Ed., Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 12 (1937–1939): Moses and monotheism, an outline of psycho-analysis and other works (pp. 7–173). Hogarth. (Original work published 1939)
24.
GentileK. (2021). Kittens in the clinical space: Expanding subjectivity through dense temporalities of interspecies transcorporeal becoming. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 31(2), 160–165.
25.
GentileK. (2024). Destroying the “human” for the survival of the world: A proposal for a temporally dense psychoanalytic subject. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 34(2), 533–541.
26.
GhoshA. (2016). The great derangement: Climate change and the unthinkable. University of Chicago Press.
27.
GhoshA. (2021). The nutmeg’s curse: Parables for a planet in crisis. University of Chicago Press.
28.
GoldbergP. (2012). Active perception and the search for sensory symbiosis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 60, 791–812.
29.
GuralnikO.SimeonD. (2010). Depersonalization: Standing in the spaces between recognition and interpellation. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 20, 400–416.
30.
HarawayD. (1990). Primate visions: Gender, race, and nature in the world of modern science. Routledge.
31.
HickmanC. (2020). We need to (find a way to) talk about . . . Eco-anxiety. Journal of Social Work Practice, 34(4), 411–424.
32.
HickmanC. (2022). Saving the other, saving the self. In VakochD.MickeyS. (Eds.) Eco-anxiety and planetary hope: Experiencing the twin disasters of COVID-19 and climate change. Springer Nature.
33.
KassoufS. (2017). Psychoanalysis and climate change: Revisiting Searles’ The Nonhuman Environment, rediscovering Freud’s Phylogenetic Fantasy, and imagining a future. American Imago, 74, 141–171.
34.
KirbyV. (1997). Telling flesh: The substance of the corporeal. Routledge.
35.
KohnE. (2013). How forests think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. University of California Press.
36.
LaplancheJ. (1999). Essays on otherness. Routledge.
37.
LatourB. (2017). Facing Gaia: Eight lectures on the new climatic regime. Polity.
38.
LatourB. (2022). How to inhabit the earth: Interviews with Nicolas Truong. Polity.
PovinelliE. (2021). Between Gaia and ground: Four axioms of existence and the ancestral catastrophe of late liberalism. Duke University Press.
51.
RizzoloG. S. (2017). The Specter of the Primitive. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 65, 945–977.
52.
RosenfeldH. (1987). Impasse and Interpretation. Routledge.
53.
SaketopoulouA. (2014). Mourning the Body as Bedrock: Developmental Considerations in Treating Transsexual Patients Analytically. Journal of American Psychoanalytic Association, 62, 773–806.
54.
SpivakG. (1987). In other worlds: Essays in cultural politics. Routledge.
55.
Stack-SullivanHarry. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. W. W. Norton.
56.
SteinR. (2005). Why perversion? “False love” and the perverse pact. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 86, 775–799.
57.
StrykerS.McCarthyD. (Eds.). (2024). The transgender studies reader remix. Routledge.
58.
TrungpaC. (1973). Cutting through spiritual materialism. Shambhala.
59.
WeintrobeS. (Ed.). (2014). Engaging with climate change: Psychoanalytic and interdisciplinary perspectives. Routledge.
WinnicottD. W. (1975). Chapter XIX. Mind and its relation to the psyche-soma. Through Pediatrics to Psychoanalysis, 100, 243–254. (Original work published 1949)
62.
ZiarekE. (2001). An ethics of dissensus: Postmodernity, feminism, and the politics of radical democracy. Stanford University Press.
