This paper applies the concept of the negative transitional object to a classic story of alcoholism and recovery, Caroline Knapp’s acclaimed 1996 memoir, Drinking: A Love Story. Knapp’s reflections on her history with drinking and its developmental precursors reinforce the notion of the negative transitional object as a problematic, if creative, adaptation to a flawed relational surround (part internalized structure, part ritual practice and belief system) beginning very early in life. Recovery is seen as mourning the lived practices and unconscious beliefs that shape the negative transitional object and its addictive rituals, restoring the connection between bodily need, relational connection and symbolic thought. This is in contrast to the good-enough transitional object which according to Winnicott is neither internalized nor mourned but “gradually decathected . . . diffused over the whole of the cultural field.”
Alcoholics Anonymous World Services. (2001). Alcoholics Anonymous (4th ed.). Alcoholics Anonymous World Services.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2019). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
3.
BradyM. (2016). Substance abuse in adolescence: Waking the object. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 52(2), 201–223.
4.
BowlbyJ. (1969). Attachment and loss, Vol. 1: Attachment. Basic Books.
5.
CaldwellL. (2018). Commentary on “The negative transitional object: Theoretical elaboration and clinical illustration.”Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 28(2), 144–150.
6.
CarrD. (2009). The night of the gun. Simon & Schuster.
7.
CheeverS. (1999). Home before dark. Washington Square Press.
8.
DodesL. M. (1995). Psychic helplessness and the psychology of addiction. In DowlingS. (Ed.), The psychology and treatment of addictive behavior (pp. 133–145). International Universities Press.
9.
DodesL. M. (2003). Addiction and psychoanalysis. Canadian Journal of Psychoanalysis, 11(1), 123–134.
10.
DodesL. M. (2010). Review of E. Khantzian & M. Albanese, Understanding addiction as self-medication: Finding hope behind the pain. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 79(2), 582–585.
11.
GreenA. (1986). The dead mother. In On private madness. International Universities Press.
12.
GreenA. (1997). The intimation of the negative in playing and reality. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 78, 1071–1082.
13.
GreeneD. (2021). Revisiting 12-step approaches: An evidence-based perspective. In MeilW. M.MellsJ. A. (Eds.), Addictions: Diagnosis and treatment. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/75130#
14.
HorneyK. (1937). The neurotic personality of our time. W. W. Norton.
15.
JellinekE. M. (1960). The disease concept of alcoholism. Hillhouse.
16.
JonesD. B. (2009). Addiction and pathological accommodation: An intersubjective look at impediments to the utilization of alcoholics anonymous. International Journal of Psychoanalytic Self Psychology, 4(2), 212–234
17.
KarenR. (1998). Becoming attached. Oxford University Press.
18.
KhantzianE.AlbaneseM. (2008). Understanding addiction as self-medication: Finding hope behind the pain. Rowman & Littlefield.
19.
KhantzianE. J. (1997). The self-medication hypothesis of substance use disorders: A reconsideration and recent application. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 4(5), 231–244.
20.
KnappC. (1996). Drinking: A love story. Dial Press.
21.
KopakA.ProctorL.HoffmannN. (2014). The elimination of abuse and dependence in DSM-5 substance use disorders: What does this mean for treatment?Current Addiction Reports, 1, 166–171.
22.
MillerW.RollnickS. (2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change (2nd ed.). Guilford.
23.
OgdenT. (1985). On potential space. International Journal of Psychoanalysis. 66, 129–141.
24.
OgdenT. H. (1989). On the concept of an autistic-contiguous position. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 70, 127–140.
25.
OgdenT. (2016). Destruction reconceived: On Winnicott’s “The use of an object and relating through identifications.”International Journal of Psychoanalysis, (97)(5):1243-1262
26.
OgdenT. (2021). What alive means: On Winnicott’s “transitional objects and transitional phenomena.”International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 102(5), 837–856.
27.
PauleyD. (2018a). The negative transitional object: Theoretical elaboration and clinical illustration. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 28(2), 131–143.
28.
PauleyD. (2018b). Response to discussants Lesley Caldwell & Van Dyke DeGolia. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 28(2), 157–163.
29.
ProchaskaJ. O.DiClementeC. C.NorcrossJ. C. (1992). In search of how people change: Applications to the addictive behaviors. American Psychologist, 47, 1102–1114.
30.
SheffN. (2009). Tweaked: Growing up on methamphetamines. Atheneum.
31.
SontagS. (1990). Illness as metaphor and AIDS and its metaphors. Picador.
32.
SpitzR.(Producer/Director). (1952). Psychogenetic diseases in infancy: An attempt at their classification. [Film]. United States: Psychoanalytic Project on Problems in Infancy.
33.
TatarskyA. (2003). Harm reduction psychotherapy: Extending the reach of traditional substance abuse treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 25, 249–256.
34.
WinnicottD. (1953). Transitional objects and transitional phenomena: A study of the first “not-me” possession. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 34, 89–97.
35.
WinnicottD. (1965). The capacity to be alone. In D. W. Winnicott, The maturational processes and the facilitating environment: Studies in the theory of emotional development. International Psychoanalytic Library. (Original work published 1958)
36.
WinnicottD. W. (1960). The theory of the parent-infant relationship. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 41, 585–595.
37.
WinnicottD. W. (1969). The use of an object and relating through identifications. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 50, 711–716.
38.
WinnicottD. W. (1972). Playing and reality. Routledge.
