At a time when many questions are arising about the nexus between psychoanalysis and social justice, the writings of Hans Loewald open an avenue for broadened conceptualizations of psychoanalytic activity and the role of interpretation within it. The pursuit of social justice, it is argued, is integral to psychoanalytic ethics, and the relation between activists and society can be formulated in Loewaldian terms. Using Loewald, and considering case examples from social justice informed advocacy, direct action, and protest speech in AIDS activism, social justice activism can be understood as a spontaneously emergent psychoanalytic interpretation delivered by activists to their social surround, effectively accomplishing multiple forms of therapeutic action. The therapeutic action includes a working through in two phases of the negative social transference, a concept proposed here to elaborate a mechanism for the transformation, through the interpretive aspects of activism, of psychic material directed toward marginalized subjects and those expressing marginalized subjective positions. Resistance to social justice activism is examined using the forms of resistance identified by Freud.
AckermanS. (2020). Impossible ethics. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association68:561–582.
2.
BenjaminJ. (2021). Acknowledgment, harming, and political trauma: Reflections after the plague year. Psychoanalytic Perspectives18:401–412.
3.
BotticelliS. (2023). The “ethical turn” in psychoanalysis: A skeptical view. Studies in Gender & Sexuality23:233–242.
4.
BoulangerG. (2012). Psychoanalytic witnessing: Professional obligation or moral imperative?Psychoanalytic Psychology29:318–324.
5.
BronskiM. (2011). A Queer History of the United States. Boston: Beacon Press.
6.
ButlerJ. (2003). Violence, mourning, politics. Studies in Gender & Sexuality4:9–37.
7.
ButlerJ. (2020). The Force of Nonviolence: The Ethical in the Political. London: Verso.
8.
Chetrit-VatineV. (2014). The Ethical Seduction of the Analytic Situation: The Feminine-Maternal Origins of Responsibility for the Other. London: Karnac Books.
9.
CorptE. (2017). Maternal ethics and the therapeutic work of protecting open futures. Psychoanalytic Inquiry37:412–418.
10.
CorptE. (2018). The ethics of listening in psychoanalytic conversations. Psychoanalysis, Self, & Context13:220–228.
11.
CrimpD. (2011). Before Occupy: How AIDS activists seized control of the FDA in 1988. The Atlantic, December 6.
12.
DrozekR. (2019). Psychoanalysis as an Ethical Process. New York: Routledge.
13.
FraserN. (2009). Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World. New York: Columbia University Press.
14.
FreudS. (1926). Inhibitions, symptoms and anxiety. Standard Edition20:87–174.
15.
FriedmanL. (2007). Who needs theory of therapeutic action?Psychoanalytic Quarterly76:1635–1662.
16.
FriedmanL. (2008). Loewald. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association56:1105–1115.
17.
GonzálezF.J. (2020a). First World problems and gated communities of the mind: An ethics of place in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Quarterly89:741–770.
18.
GonzálezF.J. (2020b). Trump cards and Klein bottles: On the collective of the individual. Psychoanalytic Dialogues30:383–398.
19.
GoodmanD.SeversonE.R., eds. (2016). The Ethical Turn: Otherness and Subjectivity in Contemporary Psychoanalysis. New York: Routledge.
20.
JaffeL. (2021). Freud and therapeutic action reconsidered: Current applications. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association69:572–593.
21.
KiteJ.V. (2016). The fundamental ethical ambiguity of the analyst as person. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association64:1153–1171.
22.
LaytonL. (2009). Who’s responsible? Our mutual implication in each other’s suffering. Psychoanalytic Dialogues19:105–120.
23.
LaytonL. (2019). Transgenerational hauntings: Toward a social psychoanalysis and an ethic of disillusionment. Psychoanalytic Dialogues29:105–121.
24.
LearJ. (1996). The introduction of Eros: Reflections on the work of Hans Loewald. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association44:673–698.
25.
LearJ. (2012). The thought of Hans W. Loewald. International Journal of Psychoanalysis93:167–179.
26.
LoewaldH.W. (1951). Ego and reality. In Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980, pp. 3–20.
27.
LoewaldH.W. (1960). On the therapeutic action of psycho-analysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis41:16–33.
28.
LoewaldH.W. (1970). Psychoanalytic theory and the psychoanalytic process. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child25:45–68.
29.
LoewaldH.W. (1971). On motivation and instinct theory. In Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980. pp. 102–137.
30.
LoewaldH.W. (1972). The experience of time. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child27:401–410.
31.
LoewaldH.W. (1975). Psychoanalysis as an art and the fantasy character of the psychoanalytic situation. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association23:277–299.
32.
LoewaldH.W. (1978). Psychoanalysis and the History of the Individual: The Freud Lectures at Yale. New Haven: Yale University Press.
33.
LoewaldH.W. (1979). Reflections on the psychoanalytic process and its therapeutic potential. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child34:155–167.
34.
LoewaldH.W. (1981). Regression: Some general considerations. Psychoanalytic Quarterly50:22–43.
35.
LoewaldH.W. (1984). Review of The Selected Papers of Margaret S. Mahler. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association32:165–175.
36.
LoewaldH.W. (1988). Psychoanalysis in search of n:ature: Thoughts on metapsychology, “metaphysics,” projection. Annual of Psychoanalysis16:49–54.
37.
MarguliesA. (2020). Falling out of the world—and the longing for home. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association68:1127–1136.
38.
MoglenS. (2005). On mourning social injury. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society10:151–167.
39.
MoglenS. (2006). Mourning and progressive politics after 9/11. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies3:118–125.
40.
MoglenS. (2007). Mourning Modernity: Literary Modernism and the Injuries of American Capitalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
OgdenT.H. (1994). The concept of interpretive action. Psychoanalytic Quarterly63:219–245.
43.
OrangeD.M. (2014). What kind of ethics? Loewald on responsibility and atonement. Psychoanalytic Psychology31:560–569.
44.
OrangeD.M. (2021a). Caste and ungrievable lives: A conversation ethical and clinical. Psychoanalytic Inquiry41:426–430.
45.
OrangeD.M. (2021b). To be of use and service. Psychoanalysis, Self, & Context16:287–288.
46.
OrangeD.M. (2022a). Climate justice and radical ethics. Psychoanalytic Dialogues32:339–340.
47.
OrangeD.M. (2022b). Radical ethics in time of plague. Psychoanalytic Inquiry42:113–123.
48.
RaoJ.M. (2021). Observations on use of the n-word in psychoanalytic conferences. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association69:315–341.
49.
RaoJ.M. (2022). The insistence on exclusion: The anti-integrative impulse and thwarted mourning in large groups. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies19:217–229.
SaketopoulouA. (2022). Anti-racist racism: Trauma, traumatism, traumatophilia. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association70:1071–1109.
52.
ScarfoneD. (2017). On “That is not psychoanalysis”: Ethics as the main tool for psychoanalytic knowledge and discussion. Psychoanalytic Dialogues27:392–400.
53.
SchulmanS. (2021). Let the Record Show: A Political History of ACT UP New York, 1987–1993. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
54.
ThriftE.SugarmanJ. (2018). What is social justice? Implications for psychology. Journal of Theoretical & Philosophical Psychology39:1–17.
55.
WilsonM. (2020). The Analyst’s Desire: The Ethical Foundation of Clinical Practice. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
56.
Young-BruehlE. (1996). The Anatomy of Prejudices. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
