Critical discourse methodology and a Black feminist lens were used to examine the discourse of contemporary psychoanalysis, specifically to investigate the relationship between language, love, and power. Findings of the analysis include the following. The discourse encourages engagement with linguistic shortcuts, wherein concepts such as oppression and bigotry are used as conduits to discuss intrapsychic experiences. The discourse frames whiteness as the center of experience and marginalizes Blackness, Indigenousness, and other nonwhite perspectives. The discourse is vague about what constitutes love and what place love should have in clinical work. Ultimately, the discourse of the texts in this analysis suggests there is more work to do, more areas in the discipline to disrupt, and more love to give.
AckermanS. (2020). Impossible ethics. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association68:561–582.
2.
BhandarB.ZiadahR. (2020). Revolutionary Feminisms: Gail Lewis. London: Verso Books.
3.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2013). Racism without Racists. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
4.
CairoI. (2017). It’s about time: Temporality in analysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association65:317–326.
5.
CaligorE.KernbergO.F.ClarkinJ.F. (2007). Handbook of Dynamic Psychotherapy for Higher Level Personality Pathology. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
6.
CoenS.J. (2018). Between action and inaction: The space for analytic intimacy. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association66:312–336.
7.
Evans-WintersV.E. (2019). Black Feminism in Qualitative Inquiry (Futures of Data Analysis in Qualitative Research). New York: Routledge.
8.
FanonF. (1952). Black Skin, White Masks, transl. PhilcoxR.. New York: Grove Press, 1994.
9.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed, transl. RamosM.B.. New York: Continuum, 2005.
10.
FrizzellL.LindsayS.DuxburyS. (2020). Race of mass shooters influences how the media cover their crimes, new study shows. The Conversation, July31.
11.
GentileJ. (2020). Time may change us: The strange temporalities, novel paradoxes, and democratic imaginaries of a pandemic. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association68:649–669.
12.
Gobodo-MadikizelaP. (2015). Psychological repair: The intersubjective dialogue of remorse and forgiveness in the aftermath of gross human rights violations. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association63:1085–1123.
13.
HallS. (1992). The West and the rest: Discourse and power. In Formations of Modernity, ed. HallS.GiebenB.. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, pp. 275–331.
14.
HarrisA. (2015). “Language is there to bewilder itself and others”: Theoretical and clinical contributions of Sabina Spielrein. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association63:727–767.
15.
hooksb. (1984). Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. Cambridge, MA: South End Press, 2000.
16.
hooksb. (2000). All about Love: New Visions. New York: Harper Perennial, 2001.
17.
KivunjaC.KuyiniA.B. (2017). Understanding and applying research paradigms in educational contexts. International Journal of Higher Education6(5):26–35.
18.
LankfordA.MadfisE. (2017). Don’t name them, don’t show them, but report everything else: A pragmatic proposal for denying mass killers the attention they seek and deterring future offenders. American Behavioral Scientist62:260–279.
19.
LewisG. (2017). Questions of presence. Feminist Review117:1–19.
20.
LordeA. (1984). Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches. New York: Ten Speed Press, 2007.
21.
MarkmanH.C. (2017). Presence, mourning, and beauty: Elements of analytic process. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association65:979–1004.
22.
MorrisonT. (1992). Playing in the Dark. New York: Vintage Books.
23.
MossD. (2016). The insane look of the bewildered half-broken animal. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association64:345–360.
24.
MovahediS. (2015). Contextualized language and transferential aspects of context. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association63:641–670.
25.
PowellD.R. (2018). Race, African Americans, and psychoanalysis: Collective silence in the therapeutic situation. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association66:1021–1049.
26.
RheeJ. (2013). The neoliberal racial project: The tiger mother and governmentality. Educational Theory63:561–580.
27.
RheeJ.SagariaM.A.D. (2004). International students: Constructions of imperialism in the Chronicle of Higher Education. Review of Higher Education28:77–96.
28.
RichommeO. (2012). The post-racial illusion: Racial politics and inequality in the age of Obama. Revue de recherche en civilisation américaine (online).
29.
SelterB. (2015). ‘No Notoriety’ campaign to not name mass murderers sees progress. CNNMoney, October2.
30.
SharpeC. (2016). In the Wake: On Blackness and Being. Durham: Duke University Press.
31.
SmithL.T. (1999). Decolonizing Methodologies:Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zed Books.
32.
SpringerJ.T. (2014). What’s post racial discourse got to do with it? Obama and implications for multiculturalism in college classrooms. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning14(3):1–15.
33.
StephensM. (2018). “Playing out” our “playing in the dark”: Racial enactments and psychoanalytic institutions. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association66:941–950.
34.
TaylorF. (2019). As much space as we can imagine. Therapy Today30/8, October.
35.
TaylorK.Y. (2017). How We Get Free: Black Feminism and the Combahee River Collective. Chicago: Haymarket Books.
36.
van DijkT.A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society4:249–283.
37.
WilkersonI. (2020). Caste: The Origins of Our Discontents. New York: Random House.
