BlassR.B.CarmeliZ. (2015). Further evidence for the case against neuropsychoanalysis: How Yovell, Solms, and Fotopoulou’s response to our critique confirms the irrelevance and harmfulness to psychoanalysis of the contemporary neuroscientific trend. International Journal of Psychoanalysis96:1555–1573.
2.
BrennerC. (1982). The Mind in Conflict. New York: International Universities Press.
3.
BrierleyM. (1944). Notes on metapsychology as process theory. International Journal of Psychoanalysis25:97–107.
4.
BrierleyM. (1951). Trends in Psychoanalysis. London: Hogarth Press.
5.
EagleM.N. (2021). Toward a Unified Psychoanalytic Theory: Foundation in a Revised and Expanded Ego Psychology. London: Routledge.
6.
ErreichA. (2003). A modest proposal (re)defining unconscious fantasy. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child72:541–574.
7.
ErreichA. (2015). Unconscious fantasy as a special class of mental representation: A contribution to a model of mind. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association63:247–270.
8.
ErreichA. (2017). Unconscious fantasy and the priming phenomenon. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association65:195–219.
9.
FenichelO. (1945). The Psychoanalytic Theory of Neurosis. New York: Norton.
10.
FisherC.P.KesslerR.J. (2018). Neuropsychoanalysis. In Textbook of Applied Psychoanalysis, ed. AkhtarS.TwemlowS.London: Routledge, pp. 115–128.
11.
FreudS. (1895). Project for a scientific psychology. Standard Edition1: 295–397.
12.
GillM.M. (1967). The primary process. In Motives and Thoughts: Psychoanalytic Essays in Honor of David Rapaport, ed. HoltR.R.New York: International Universities Press, pp. 259–298.
13.
GillM.M. (1976). Metapsychology is not psychology. In Psychology versus Metapsychology: Psychoanalytic Essays in Memory of George S. Klein, ed. GillM.M.HolzmanP.S.New York: International Universities Press, pp. 71–105.
14.
GillM.M.HolzmanP.S., eds. (1976). Psychology versus Metapsychology: Psychoanalytic Essays in Memory of George S. Klein. New York: International Universities Press.
15.
GrossmanW.I.SimonB. (1969). Anthropomorphism: Motive, meaning, and causality in psychoanalytic theory. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child24:78–111.
16.
HartmannH. (1958). Ego Psychology and the Problem of Adaptation. New York: International Universities Press.
17.
HartmannH. (1964). Essays on Ego Psychology: Selected Problems in Psychoanalytic Theory. New York: International Universities Press.
18.
HartmannH.KrisE.LoewensteinR.M. (1964). Papers on Psychoanalytic Psychology. New York: International Universities Press.
19.
HoltR.R. (1965). A review of some of Freud’s biological assumptions and their influence on his theories. In Psychoanalysis and Current Biological Thought, ed. GreenfieldN.S.LewisW.C.Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 93–124.
20.
HoltR.R. (1967). The development of the primary process: A structural view. In Motives and Thoughts: Psychoanalytic Essays in Honor of David Rapaport, ed. HoltR.R.New York: International Universities Press, pp. 344–383.
21.
HoltR.R. (1972). Freud’s mechanistic and humanistic images of man. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Science1:3–24.
22.
HoltR.R. (1976). Drive or wish? A reconsideration of the psychoanalytic theory of motivation. In Psychology versus Metapsychology: Psychoanalytic Essays in Memory of George S. Klein, ed. GillM.M.HolzmanP.S.New York: International Universities Press, pp. 158–197.
23.
KleinG.S. (1967). Peremptory ideation: Structure and force in motivated ideas. In Motives and Thought: Psychoanalytic Essays in Honor of David Rapaport, ed. HoltR.R.New York: International Universities Press, pp. 78–130.
24.
KleinG.S. (1976). Psychoanalytic Theory: An Exploration of Essentials. New York: International Universities Press.
25.
KubieL. (1947). The fallacious use of quantitative concepts in dynamic psychology. Psychoanalytic Quarterly16:507–518.
26.
Leuzinger-BohleberM.KallenbachL.SchoettM.J. (2016). Pluralistic approaches to the study of process and outcome in psychoanalysis: The LAC depression study, a case in point. Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy30:4–22.
27.
Leuzinger-BohleberM.SolmsM.ArnoldS.E., eds. (2020). Outcome Research and the Future of Psychoanalysis: Clinicians and Researchers in Dialogue. London: Routledge.
28.
LoewaldH.W. (1976). Perspectives on memory. In Psychology versus Metapsychology: Psychoanalytic Essays in Memory of George S. Klein, ed. GillM.M.HolzmanP.S.New York: International Universities Press, pp. 298–325.
29.
LoewensteinR.M.NewmanL.M.SchurM.SolnitA.J., eds. (1966). Psychoanalysis—A General Psychology: Essays in Honor of Heinz Hartmann. New York: International Universities Press.
30.
MaymanM. (1976). Psychoanalytic theory in retrospect and prospect. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic40:199–210.
31.
PaulI.H. (1967). The concept of schema in memory theory. In Motives and Thought: Psychoanalytic Essays in Honor of David Rapaport, ed. HoltR.R.New York: International Universities Press, pp. 218–258.
32.
PulverS.E. (2003). On the astonishing clinical irrelevance of neuroscience. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association51:755–772.
33.
RapaportD. (1951). Organization and Pathology of Thought: Selected Sources. New York: Columbia University Press.
34.
RapaportD. (1960). The Structure of Psychoanalytic Theory: A Systematizing Attempt. New York: International Universities Press.
35.
RosenblattA.D.ThickstunJ.T. (1970). A study of the concept of psychic energy. International Journal of Psychoanalysis51:265–278.
36.
RosenblattA.D.ThickstunJ.T. (1977). Modern Psychoanalytic Concepts in a General Psychology. New York: International Universities Press.
37.
RubensteinB.B. (1965). Psychoanalytic theory and the mind–body problem. In Psychoanalysis and Current Biological Thought, ed. GreenfieldN.S.LewisW.C.Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 35–56.
38.
RubensteinB.B. (1967). Explanation and mere description: A metascientific examination of certain aspects of the psychoanalytic theory of motivation. In Motives and Thoughts: Psychoanalytic Essays in Honor of David Rapaport, ed. HoltR.R.New York: International Universities Press, pp. 18–77.
39.
RycroftC. (1968). A Critical Dictionary of Psychoanalysis. London: Thomas Nelson.
40.
SchaferR. (1973). Action: Its place in psychoanalytic theory. Annual of Psychoanalysis1:159–196.
41.
SchaferR. (1976a). Emotion in the language of action. In Psychology versus Metapsychology: Psychoanalytic Essays in Memory of George S. Klein, ed. GillM.M.HolzmanP.S.New York: International Universities Press, pp. 106–133.
42.
SchaferR. (1976b). A New Language for Psychoanalysis. New Haven: Yale University Press.
43.
SchaferR. (1983). The Analytic Attitude. New York: Basic Books.
44.
ShapiroD. (1970). Motivation and action in psychoanalytic psychiatry. Psychiatry33:329–343.
45.
SolmsM. (2000). Preliminaries for an integration of psychoanalysis and neuroscience. Annual of Psychoanalysis28:179–200.
46.
SolmsM. (2014). The primary concern of psychoanalysis. Neuro-psychoanalysis16:49–51.
47.
SolmsM. (2020). The scientific basis of psychoanalysis: Introductory remarks. In Outcome Research and the Future of Psychoanalysis: Clinicians and Researchers in Dialogue, ed. Leuzinger-BohleberM.SolmsM.ArnoldS.E.London: Routledge, pp. 26–34.
48.
SolmsM. (2021). Revision of drive theory. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association69:1033–1091.
49.
SugarmanA. (1977). Object-relations theory: A reconciliation of phenomenology and ego psychology. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic41:113–130.
50.
SugarmanA. (2019). The importance of considering development when analyzing patients with adult ADHD: Commentary on Whiteside. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child72:118–130.
51.
SugarmanA. (2021). Lee Jaffe’s unifying approach to psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association69:595–606.
52.
SugarmanA. (in press). Why is psychoanalytic education so conflictual? In Psychoanalysis at the Crossroads, ed. BuschF.London: Routledge.
53.
SugarmanA.JaffeL.S. (1990). Toward a developmental understanding of the self schema. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought13:117–138.
54.
WolffP.H. (1967). Cognitive considerations for a psychoanalytic theory of language acquisition. In Motives and Thoughts: Psychoanalytic Essays in Honor of David Rapaport, ed. HoltR.R.New York: International Universities Press, pp. 299–343.
55.
YankelovichD.BarrettW. (1970). Ego and Instinct. New York: Random House.
56.
YovellY.SolmsM.FotopoulouA. (2015). The case for neuroscience: Why a dialogue with neuroscience is necessary but not sufficient for psychoanalysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis96:1515–1553.