The Extremes of Contemporary Violence: From a State of Paralysis to the Transformation of Trauma

Abstract

Psychoanalysis is today faced, clinically and conceptually, with extremes of violence and forced exile, creating a need to rethink clinical work with patients whose life has been marked by disaster. In work with foreign patients, difficulty in speaking about trauma is sometimes attributed to a linguistic barrier; however, the experience of terror can in any situation whatever be expressed only with difficulty. Cultural differences must not be ignored, but the clinician must find a way to facilitate speech in a subject experiencing a state of dread. Speaking cannot be forced. Offering a presence in which the analyst accepts being the recipient of what is unbearable and recognizes the subject’s current state of chaos is essential in establishing or mobilizing transference in work with patients subject to unlinking. This can initiate a transformation of the trauma, as is shown in two clinical vignettes of refugee patients in France who were victims of terror in their countries of origin. The approach discussed here differs from the earlier ethnopsychiatric method, which would reduce these others to exotic envelopes of their culture, independent of their subjectivity.

Keywords

Freudian theory trauma Lacanian theory extremism ethnopsychiatry culturalism transformative processes linguistic difference

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aulagnier

(2001). The Violence of Interpretation: From Pictogram to Statement. London: Routledge.

Bion

W.R.

(1962). Learning from Experience. London: Tavistock Publications.

Bion

W.R.

(1967). Second Thoughts. London: Heinemann.

Bohleber

(2007). Remémoration, traumatisme et mémoire collective: Le combat pour la remémoration en psychanalyse. Revue française de psychanalyse 71:803–830.

Bollas

(1979). The transformational object. Inernational Journal of Psychoanalysis 60:97–107.

Botella

(1988). Trauma et topique: Aspects techniques de l’abord du trauma en séance, Revue française de psychanalyse 52:1461–1477.

Champion

(1989). Mémoires en exil. Paris: Fayard.

Danto

E.A.

(2005). Freud’s Free Clinics: Psychoanalysis and Social Justice, 1918–1938. New York: Columbia University Press.

Davoine

Gaudillère

J.-M.

(2004). History beyond Trauma. New York: Other Press.

10.

Devereux

(1956). Normal and abnormal. In Some Uses of Anthropology, ed. Casagrande

Gladwin

Washington, DC: Anthropological Society of Washington, pp. 24–48.

11.

Devereux

(1978). Ethnopsychoanalysis: Psychoanalysis and Anthropology as Complementary Frames of Reference. Berkeley: University of California Press.

12.

Ferenczi

(1930–1932). Notes and fragments. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 30:231–242, 1949.

13.

Ferenczi

(1932a). Repetition in analysis worse than original trauma. In Final Contributions to the Problems and Methods of Psycho-Analysis, ed. Balint

, transl. Mosbacher

London: Karnac Books,1994, p. 268.

14.

Ferenczi

(1932b). On shock (Erschütterung). In Final Contributions to the Problems and Methods of Psycho-Analysis, ed. Balint

, transl. Mosbacher

London: Karnac Books, p. 253.

15.

Freud

(1919). Introduction to Psycho-Analysis and the War Neuroses. Standard Edition 17:207–216.

16.

Freud

(1920). Beyond the pleasure principle. Standard Edition 18:7-64.

17.

Gori

(2017). Un monde sans esprit: La fabrique des terrorismes. Logique des passions. Paris: Les Liens qui Libèrent.

18.

Green

(1999). The Work of the Negative. London: Free Association Books.

19.

Grinberg

(2009). Psychoanalytic Perspectives on Migration and Exile. New Haven: Yale University Press.

20.

Janin

(1996). Figures et destins du traumatisme. Paris: PUF.

21.

Lacan

(1963–1964). The Seminars of Jacques Lacan: Book XI. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis, transl. Sheridan

New York: Norton, 1998.

22.

Lebigot

Gauthier

Morgand

Reges

M.L.

Lassagne

(1997). Le débriefing psychologique collectif. Annales médico-psychologiques 155:370–378.

23.

Lévy

(2010). L’ivresse du pire. Paris: Campagne Première.

24.

Marty

(1976). Les mouvements individuels de vie et de mort: Essai d’économie psychosomatique. Volume 1. Paris: Payot.

25.

McDougall

(1989). Theatres of the Body: A Psychoanalytic Approach to Psychosomatic Illness. London: Free Association Books.

26.

Mitchell

J.T.

(1983). When disaster strikes: The critical incident stress debriefing process. Journal of Emergency Medical Services 8:36–39.

27.

Nathan

(1993). Fier de n’avoir ni pays, ni amis, quelle sottise c’était: Principes d’ethnopsychanalyse. Paris: La Pensée Sauvage.

28.

Nathan

(1994). L’influence qui guérit. Paris: Odile Jacob.

29.

Rosenblum

(2000). Peut-on mourir de dire? Sarah Kofman, Primo Levi. Revue française de psychanalyse 64:113–137.

30.

Sokolowsky

(2013). Freud et les berlinois: Du congrès de Budapest à l’institut de Berlin 1918–1933. Rennes: PUR.

31.

Vinar

M.N.

(2005). The specificity of torture as trauma: The human wilderness when words fail. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 86:311–333.

32.

Volkan

V.D.

(1972). The linking objects of pathological mourners. Archives of General Psychiatry 27:215–221.

33.

Winnicott

D.W.

(1971). Playing and Reality. London: Tavistock Publications.

34.

Zaltzman

(1998). De la guérison psychanalytique. Paris: PUF.