BlegerJ. (1967). Psycho-analysis of the psycho-analytic frame. International Journal of Psychoanalysis48:511–519.
2.
BlegerJ. (2012). Symbiosis and Ambiguity: A Psychoanalytic Study, transl. RogersS.BlegerL.ChurcherJ.New York: Routledge.
3.
BionW.R. (1970). Attention and Interpretation. New York: Basic Books.
4.
GoldbergP. (2021). “Not final, not complete”: Winnicott’s remarkable presentation on communication, San Francisco, October 8, 1962. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association69:451–468.
5.
GreenA. (1975). The analyst, symbolization and absence in the analytic setting (on changes in analytic practice and analytic experience)—in memory of D.W. Winnicott. International Journal of Psychoanalysis56:1–22.
6.
LaschC. (1979). The Culture of Narcissism. New York: Norton.
7.
Merleau-PontyM. (1945). Phenomenology of Perception, transl. LandesD.A.New York: Routledge, 2012.
8.
OgdenT.H. (1989). On the concept of an autistic-contiguous position. International Journal of Psychoanalysis70:127–140.
9.
OgdenT.H. (2014). Fear of breakdown and the unlived life. International Journal of Psychoanalysis95:205–223.
10.
OgdenT.H. (2018). The feeling of real: On Winnicott’s “Communicating and not communicating leading to a study of certain opposites.”International Journal of Psychoanalysis99:1288–1304.
11.
SlochowerJ. (2020). On behalf of the child: Winnicott’s work during the war years (Review of Collected Works, Vol. 2). Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association68:969–977.
