BaudryF. (2009). Winnicott’s 1968 visit to the New York Psychoanalytic Society and Institute: A contextual view. Psychoanalytic Quarterly78:1059–1090.
2.
BloomH. (1973). The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
3.
BowlbyJ. (1969). Attachment and Loss: Vol.1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
4.
EntzG.R. (2005). Religion in Kansas. Kansas History: A Journal of the Central Plains28:120–145.
5.
EriksonE.H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle. Psychological Issues1:18–171.
6.
FreudA. (1936). The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defense. New York: International Universities Press, 1966.
7.
FreudS. (1937). Constructions in analysis. Standard Edition23:255–270.
8.
FriedmanL.J. (1990). Menninger: The Family and the Clinic. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
9.
GoldmanD. (1993). In Search of the Real: The Origins and Originality of D.W. Winnicott. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
10.
GreenbergJ.MitchellS. (1983). Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
11.
GrolnickS.A.BarkinL.MuensterbergerW.eds. (1978). Between Reality and Fantasy: Transitional Objects and Phenomena. New York: Aronson.
12.
HartmannH. (1958). Ego Psychology and the Problem of Adaptation. New York: International Universities Press.
13.
HerzogD. (2016). Cold War Freud: Psychoanalysis in an Age of Catastrophe. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14.
HoffmanM. (2004). From enemy combatant to strange bedfellow: The role of religious narratives in the work of D.W. Winnicott. Psychoanalytic Dialogues14:769–804.
15.
KingP.SteinerR.eds. (1991). The Freud-Klein Controversies, 1941–45. London: Tavistock Publications.
KleinM. (1940). Mourning and its relation to manic-depressive states. International Journal of Psychoanalysis21:125–153.
18.
LacanJ. (1953). Some reflections on the ego. International Journal of Psychoanalysis34:11–17.
19.
MelikianK. (in press). Winniott’s reach: The expanding holding environment and the quest for creative elaboration. In Winnicott in America, ed. AguayoJ.New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
MenningerK. (1938). Man against Himself. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
21.
MenningerK. (1942). Love against Hate. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
22.
RapaportD. (1959). A historical survey of psychoanalytic ego psychology. Psychological Issues1:5–17.
23.
RodmanF.R. (2003). Winnicott: Life and Work. Cambridge, MA: DaCapo Press.
24.
SeligmanS. (2018a). Illusion as a basic psychic principle: Winnicott, Freud, Oedipus, and Trump. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association66:263–288.
25.
SeligmanS. (2018b). Relationships in Development: Infancy, Intersubjectivity, and Attachment. New York: Routledge.
26.
SeligmanS. (2021). Winnicott’s baby. Presentation at the meetings of the International Psychoanalytical Association, July, Vancouver.
27.
SeligmanS. (in press). Winnicott in Topeka: Ego psychology, American culture, and object relations: Style and substance in the “Stage of Concern.” In Winnicott in America, ed. AguayoJ.New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
van der WaalsH.G. (1962). Discussion of Dr. Winnicott’s paper. Original manuscript retrieved from the Kansas State Historical Society, Topeka.
29.
WallersteinR.S. (1962). Summary of my discussion of Winnicott’s paper “The Origin of the Capacity for Concern” at the Topeka Psychoanalytic Society, October12, 1962. Original manuscript retrieved from the Kansas State Historical Society, Topeka.
30.
WallersteinR.S. (1986). Forty-two Lives in Treatment: A Study of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy. New York: Guilford Press.
31.
WallersteinR.S. (1990). Psychoanalysis: The common ground. International Journal of Psychoanalysis71:3–20.
32.
WallersteinR.S. (2015). Psychoanalysis as I have known it: 1949–2013. Psychoanalytic Dialogues25:536–556.
33.
WinnicottD.W. (1959–1964). Classification: Is there a psycho-analytic contribution to psychiatric classification? In The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment. New York: International Universities Press, 1965, pp. 124–139.
34.
WinnicottD.W. (1960). The theory of the parent-infant relationship. In The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment. New York: International Universities Press, 1965, pp. 37–55.
35.
WinnicottD.W. (1962a). A personal view of the Kleinian contribution. In The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment. New York: International Universities Press, 1965, pp. 171–178.
36.
WinnicottD.W. (1962b). The psychoanalyst and child psychiatry: A matter of economics. Presentation at a forum of the Menninger School of Psychiatry, October, Topeka. Original manuscript retrieved from the Kansas State Historical Society, Topeka.
37.
WinnicottD.W. (1963a). Communicating and not communicating leading to a study of certain opposites. In The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment. New York: International Universities Press, 1965, pp. 179–192.
38.
WinnicottD.W. (1963b). Dependence in infant-care, in child-care, and in the psycho-analytic setting. In The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment. New York: International Universities Press, 1965, pp. 249–260.
39.
WinnicottD.W. (1963c). The development of the capacity for concern. In The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment. New York: International Universities Press, 1965, pp. 73–82.
40.
WinnicottD.W. (1967). Letter to Wilfred R. Bion. In The Collected Works of D.W. Winnicott: Vol. 8. 1967–1968, ed. CaldwellL.RobinsonH.T.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, p. 157