Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This psychoanalytic reading of Hamlet places Shakespeare’s play in the theoretical contexts of Loewald on time and Winnicott on space. For Loewald the subject moves from past to present, in a therapeutic fashion, through the intervention of the analyst, a contemporary object. A redemption of time occurs in the internalized action of thought and dialogue. In Winnicott the redemptive movement is from an internal-subjective to an external-objective way of perceiving. The passage occurs in a transitional space where the presence of another allows the discovery of a world. Hamlet suffers from a ghosted self emptied in submission to the father-ghost. In the temporality of thought and the spatiality of action Hamlet moves toward an ancestral self, filled and stable, through the mediation of Horatio, his friend-counselor-analyst.

Keywords

ghosts ancestors father-ghost space time friend as good object ego identification internalization object relations transference transitional space

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bloom

. (1998). Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human. New York: Riverhead.

Cavell

. (1987). Disowning Knowledge in Seven Plays of Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Freud

. (1900). The interpretation of dreams. Standard Edition 4/5.

Freud

. (1915). Mourning and melancholia. Standard Edition 14:243–258.

Freud

. (1924). The dissolution of the Oedipus complex. Standard Edition 19:173–179.

Greenblatt

. (2004). Will in the World: How Shakespeare Became Shakespeare. New York: Norton.

Irwin

J.T

. (1975). Doubling and Incest / Repetition and Return: A Speculative Reading of Faulkner. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Lear

. (2000). Introduction. In The Essential Loewald: Collected Papers and Monographs, ed. N. Quist. Hagerstown, MD: University Publishing Group, pp. ix–xl.

Loewald

H.W

. (1951). Ego and reality. In Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980, pp. 3–20.

10.

Loewald

H.W

. (1960). On the therapeutic action of psychoanalysis. In Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980, pp. 221–256.

11.

Loewald

H.W

. (1962). Internalization, separation, mourning, and the superego. In Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980, pp. 257–276.

12.

Loewald

H.W

. (1973). On internalization. In Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980, pp. 69–86.

13.

Loewald

H.W

. (1979). The waning of the Oedipus complex. In Papers on Psychoanalysis, 1980, pp. 384–404.

14.

Loewald

H.W

. (1988). Sublimation: Inquiries into Theoretical Psychoanalysis. New Haven: Yale University Press.

15.

Ogden

T.H

. (1985). On potential space. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 66:129–141.

16.

Ogden

T.H

. (2012). Freud’s “Mourning and melancholia” and the origins of object relations theory. In Creative Readings: Essays on Seminal Analytic Works. New York: Routledge, pp. 11–33.

17.

Sacks

P.M

. (1985). Where words prevail not: Grief, revenge, and language in Kyd and Shakespeare. In The English Elegy: Studies in the Genre from Spenser to Yeats. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 38–63.

18.

Shakespeare

. (c. 1602). Hamlet, ed. Thompson

Taylor

Rev. ed. London: Bloomsbury Arden, 2016.

19.

Winnicott

D.W

. (1960). Ego distortion in terms of true and false self. In The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment: Studies in the Theory of Emotional Development. London: Hogarth Press, 1965, pp. 140–152.

20.

Winnicott

D.W

. (1971a). The location of cultural experience. In Playing and Reality. London: Tavistock Publications, pp. 128–139.

21.

Winnicott

D.W

. (1971b). Playing: A theoretical statement. In Playing and Reality. London: Tavistock Publications, pp. 51–70.

22.

Winnicott

D.W

. (1971c). The use of an object and relating through identifications. In Playing and Reality. London: Tavistock Publications, pp. 115–127.

23.

Winnicott

D.W

. (1989). Psycho-Analytic Explorations, ed. Winnicott

London: Karnac Books.

Ghosted and Ancestral Selves in Hamlet : Loewald’s “Present Life” and Winnicott’s “Potential Space” in Shakespeare’s Play

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References