The philosopher Adolf Grünbaum has repeatedly criticized Freud’s reasoning, claiming that much of it is overtly fallacious. One such criticism that has gone without reply concerns Freud’s controversial response to the counterwish objection to his theory of dreams, that the reason some dreams appear to represent the frustration of a wish rather than the fulfillment of one is that they actually represent the dreamer’s wish to prove Freud wrong. Grünbaum contends that in giving such a response Freud commits several glaring fallacies. But Grünbaum’s analysis is mistaken and misrepresents Freud’s thought. Contrary to Grünbaum’s interpretation of Freud’s reasoning as deductive, this reasoning is best construed as a form of “inference to the best explanation.”
BirdA. (1998). Philosophy of Science. London: UCL Press.
2.
BlassR. (2001). The limitations of critical studies of the epistemology of Freud’s dream theory and their clinical implications: Response to Spence and Grünbaum. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought24:115–151.
3.
BoagS.BrakelL.A.W.TalvitieV., eds. (2015). Philosophy, Science, and Psychoanalysis: A Critical Meeting. London: Karnac Books.
4.
BreuerJ.FreudS. (1895). Studies on hysteria. Standard Edition2.
5.
BrookA. (1992). Psychoanalysis and commonsense psychology. Annual of Psychoanalysis20:273–303.
6.
CioffiF. (1998). Freud and the Question of Pseudoscience. Chicago: Open Court Publishing.
7.
DarwinC. (1859). The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, ed. BurrowJ.W.London: Penguin Classics, 1985.
8.
DolnickE. (1998). Madness on the Couch: Blaming the Victim in the Heyday of Psychoanalysis. New York: Simon & Schuster.
9.
DouvenI. (2017). Abduction. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. ZaltaE.N. Online.
10.
FreudS. (1900). The interpretation of dreams. Standard Edition4/5.
11.
GrünbaumA. (1993). Validation in the Clinical Theory of Psychoanalysis: A Study in the Philosophy of Psychoanalysis. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
12.
HarmanG.H. (1965). The inference to the best explanation. Philosophical Review74:88–95.
13.
HempelC.G. (1966). Philosophy of Natural Science. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
14.
HinshelwoodR.D. (2010). Psychoanalytic research: Is clinical material any use?Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy24:362–379.
15.
HopkinsJ. (1988). Epistemology and depth psychology: Critical notes onThe Foundations of Psychoanalysis. In Mind, Psychoanalysis and Science, ed. ClarkP.WrightC.Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 33–60.
16.
HopkinsJ. (1991). The interpretation of dreams. In The Cambridge Companion to Freud, ed. NeuJ.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 86–135.
17.
LacewingM. (2012). Inferring motives in psychology and psychoanalysis. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology19:197–212.
18.
LiptonP. (1993). Is the best good enough?Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society93:89–104.
19.
LiptonP. (2004). Inference to the Best Explanation. London: Routledge.
20.
LothaneZ. (2007). Response to Professor Adolf Grünbaum. Psychoanalytic Psychology24:577–585.
21.
MackonisA. (2013). Inference to the best explanation, coherence and other explanatory virtues. Synthese190:975–995.
22.
MansonN.C. (2003). Freud’s own blend: Functional analysis, idiographic explanation, and the extension of ordinary psychology. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society103:179–195.
23.
MichaelM.T. (2015). Freud’s Theory of Dreams: A Philosophico-Scientific Perspective. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
24.
MichaelM.T. (2019). The case for the Freud-Breuer theory of hysteria: A response to Grünbaum’s foundational objection to psychoanalysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis100:32–52.
25.
MillsJ. (2007). A response to Grünbaum’s refutation of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Psychology24:539–544.
26.
SachsD. (1989). In fairness to Freud: A critical notice of The Foundations of Psychoanalysis, by Adolf Grünbaum. Philosophical Review90:349–378.
27.
SalmonW.C. (1989). Four Decades of Scientific Explanation. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2006.
28.
van FraassenB.C. (1980). The Scientific Image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
WebsterR. (1995). Why Freud Was Wrong: Sin, Science, and Psychoanalysis. London: Fontana.
30.
WollheimR. (1991). Freud. London: Fontana.
31.
WollheimR. (1993). The Mind and Its Depths. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
