Reconstruction in A Two-Person World May Be More About The Present Than The Past: Freud and The Wolf Man,an Illustration

Abstract

The psychoanalytic process of reconstruction has yet to be examined from the perspective of today’s two-person psychologies. Earlier writers on the subject have implicated the analyst and his emotional involvement as influences that may distort the valid recovery of memories, while others have written that the transference and the reconstructed past are interdependent. By contrast with both views, it is suggested here that the reconstructed product itself may reflect the transference-countertransference engagement of the dyad: in some instances, and to some extent in all instances, the scene or story of the presumed past will be a version of the current analytic relationship. In certain cases consideration of the conscious and unconscious emotional entanglements of the dyad will reveal that the reconstruction says more about the analytic present than about the past. Freud’s Wolf Man case provides a good illustration of this point. While a broad consensus exists that its famous primal scene reconstruction cannot be veridical, it has most often been dismissed as distorted by Freud’s theoretical commitments. A closer examination of the relationship between Freud and Pankejeff reveals that the reconstruction is an accurate rendering of warded-off aspects of the dyad’s way of being together. The potential clinical utility of adopting this perspective is that it encourages the analyst to reflect on his clinical reconstructions, interrogating them for clues to otherwise elusive aspects of the current clinical relationship.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Blum

H.P.

(1999). The reconstruction of reminiscence. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 47:1125–1143.

Blum

H.P.

(2013). Wolf Man: Concluding commentary. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 94:963–966.

Brunswick

R.M.

(1928). A supplement to Freud’s ‘History of an infantile neurosis.’ International Journal of Psychoanalysis 9:439–476.

Faulkner

(1951). Requiem for a Nun. New York: Random House.

Freud

(1899). Letter from Freud to Fliess, September 21. In The Complete Letters of Sigmund Freud to Wilhelm Fliess, 1887–1904, ed. Masson

J.M.

Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1986, pp. 373–374.

Freud

(1909). Letter from Sigmund Freud to C.G. Jung, December 2. In The Freud/Jung Letters: The Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and C.G. Jung, ed. McGuire

, transl. Hull

R.F.C.

Mannheim

Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1974, pp. 270–272.

Freud

(1910a). Letter from Sigmund Freud to Oskar Phister, July 23. In Psychoanalysis and Faith: The Letters of Sigmund Freud and Oskar Phister, ed. Meng

Freud

E.L.

, transl. Mosbacher

London: Hogarth Press, 1963, pp. 42–43.

Freud

(1910b). Letter from Sigmund Freud to Sándor Ferenczi, February 8. In The Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Sándor Ferenczi: Vol. 1, 1908—1914, ed. Brabant

Falzeder

Giampieri-Deutsch

Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993, pp. 133–135.

Freud

(1910c). Letter from Sigmund Freud to Sándor Ferenczi, February 13. In The Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Sándor Ferenczi: Vol. 1, 1908—1914, ed. Brabant

Falzeder

Giampieri-Deutsch

Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993, pp. 136–139.

10.

Freud

(1911a). Letter from Sigmund Freud to C.G. Jung, January 22. In The Freud/Jung Letters: The Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and C.G. Jung, ed. McGuire

, transl. Hull

R.F.C.

Mannheim

Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1974, pp. 386–388.

11.

Freud

(1911b). Letter from Sigmund Freud to C.G. Jung, July 23. In The Freud/Jung Letters: The Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and C.G. Jung, ed. McGuire

, transl. Hull

R.F.C.

Mannheim

Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1974, pp. 402–404.

12.

Freud

(1918). From the history of an infantile neurosis. Standard Edition 17:7–122.

13.

Gardiner

M.M.

(1964). The Wolf Man grows older. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 12:80–92.

14.

Greenacre

(1981). Reconstruction: Its nature and therapeutic value. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 29:27–46.

15.

Jacobs

T.J.

(1973). Posture, gesture, and movement: Cues to interpretation and countertransference. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 21:77–92.

16.

Levenson

E.A.

(1972). The Fallacy of Understanding: An Inquiry into the Changing Structure of Psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books.

17.

Levenson

E.A.

(1983). The Ambiguity of Change. New York: Basic Books.

18.

Obholzer

(1982). The Wolf-Man: Conversations with Freud’s Patient Sixty Years Later, transl. Shaw

New York: Continuum.

19.

Pankejeff

(1926). Letters pertaining to Freud’s ‘History of an infantile neurosis.’ Psychoanalytic Quarterly 26:449–460, 1957.

20.

Racker

(1957). The meanings and uses of countertransference. Psychoanalytic Quarterly 26:303–357.